Whom Would You Fuck? (1/12/2012)

[JackTwist]

Which one of these studs is most sexually appealing to you? And Why?

 

http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/1366/39511031008042235628117.jpg

#1 or #2?

[Diverdan]

I think #1... probably because he has that "look" about him! Can you tell us who he is? Is he an escort? Do you have more photos of him?

Thanks, Jack... it was a difficult choice.

[jjkrkwood]

#2 - love the miltary hair cut, the target nipples, and the deep-cut abs you can lick for hours. Also his shoulder development is a bit more evolved.

[Bosguy]

Definitely # 2. He has that military/jock look that is SO HOT. Would love to find out about his military "maneuvers" and jock "exercises"

 

Boston Bill

[adriano46]

Had to look 4 or 5 times. Nice looks on both of them but...

 

# 2 -- better nips, better defined abs and his belly button is an out one which I LIKE, and looking at the hips he seems to offer a meatier butt.

[Pegasus]

I agree w/ adriano that #2 undoubtedly has the beefier derrière, so he's my guy!

[shadowcatzxxx]

no problem for me -- either one ... or both. YUM!

[ChiTown]

#1 does it for me. Sculpted body, not overly muscled . . . great eyes and mouth.

[hornytwells]

I prefer #1-beautiful eyes, nice hair! I prefer closer together eyes, rather than wide apart, just a particular idiosyncrasy of mine! (for example much prefer Ryan Reynolds to Brendan Fraser)

[Guest]

#2 (lighter-colored jeans) has much more handsome and expressive eyes, and he's certainly better-built. #1 is just thin.

[joethomas]

Number 2 - stunner! The nips and belly button totally do it. Wonder what his pits look like!! Any more of him?

[justaguy]

Tough choice, this one! I'm going with number two because of the pecs and the shorter hair.

[Samai139]

Had no difficulty selecting #1 as my preference, but explaining is much harder. One has a familiarity that attracted me---maybe it's the fact that he looks like a few men that I have lusted after in person? Like the face---he seems vulnerable and gentle and approachable. Body is not as developed as two but hey, there is plenty of man there to explore and caress. Thanks for posting. Final thought? Something tells me number one has a lot going for him under these jeans )

[dapurplebear]

#2 - the arms - the pecs and the clear moaning potential...

[+ WilliamM]

#1 is my chose. #2 has spent too much time in the gym, just not my type.

[+ purplekow]

Which one of these studs is most sexually appealing to you? And Why?[/size][/b]

 

http://img546.imageshack.us/img546/1366/39511031008042235628117.jpg

#1 or #2?

For me, #1 has the more handsome face though both are good looking men. #2 has the better body type, thicker, nicer pecs and shoulders. Since I prefer doggy style and biting on a thickly developed neck, I would not see either one's face so the answer is a resounding #2.

 

"Now get on your knees and get your ass in the air and don't beg for mercy, it won't help you."

[happyguy2]

I would really like both, each one has qualities I really like!

[+ Axiom2001]

For me, #1 has the more handsome face though both are good looking men. #2 has the better body type, thicker, nicer pecs and shoulders. Since I prefer doggy style and biting on a thickly developed neck, I would not see either one's face so the answer is a resounding #2.

 

"Now get on your knees and get your ass in the air and don't beg for mercy, it won't help you."

 

 

Number two for me, please! He's more defined, and the reasons of others here are mine, too!!! YUM! YUM! YUM!

[RockCreekRunr]

#1 - his face looks like an angel; i love his less conventional, longer hair in back; betting he's a bottom!

[Bosguy]

I have to revise my choice. I really would fuck either # 1 or # 2 while the other was fucking me. Hate to take sides!

 

Boston Bill

[Phil_musc]

Bill, you are such a compromiser - but in this case, I think you've made the ultimate best choice!

[MscleLovr]

To answer a few comments:

"Number 1" is American, moved to London some years ago, and claims to be a model (and has done work for AAG) but also advertises on Gaydar as a "sexual therapist". He describes himself online as versatile but was ready to bottom until....

Yes, the bad news is that he's very selective - "Sorry, no guys over 40" - so my big thick wallet went unused

[hornytwells]

To answer a few comments:

"Number 1" is American, moved to London some years ago, and claims to be a model (and has done work for AAG) but also advertises on Gaydar as a "sexual therapist". He describes himself online as versatile but was ready to bottom until....

Yes, the bad news is that he's very selective - "Sorry, no guys over 40" - so my big thick wallet went unused

 

You vejust killed it for me.....would have considered hiring him, but that last comment has now put me off him! Damn! lol (you got a link to his ad?)

[jjkrkwood]

To answer a few comments:

"Number 1" is American, moved to London some years ago, and claims to be a model (and has done work for AAG) but also advertises on Gaydar as a "sexual therapist". He describes himself online as versatile but was ready to bottom until....

Yes, the bad news is that he's very selective - "Sorry, no guys over 40" - so my big thick wallet went unused

 

Well thats good to know since I am over his age limit, and dont like mullet haircuts anyway...

[Diverdan]

Sorry to get that info, MSCLELOVR, as I too am "over the hill" for him. Your reference to him being in London struck a chord with me, as the last time I was in London I was with someone who was almost identical to this guy.... although I was over 40 at the time, so it would not have been him. I guess I will go to Gaydar just to check out his listing, or do you have a link/name? Thanks...