Multiple Personalities

[marc anthony]

Just in the escort travel section

[+ deej]

>I do agree that some posters do use several screen names.

>There is someone who posted in the Street Hustlers forum a

>new thread then went on to respond to himself, now that is

>strange }>

 

No, the *really* strange cases are the ones we catch in the queue. When you post a response to (with quotes from) a message that isn't yet publicly visible, you're trying too hard. :o

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

>The fact is I did have another screen name when I first

>found this website but changed to this one for the simple

>reason that I let the old one lie dormant for so long it no

>longer worked.

>

 

Pick,

 

Seems to me a little insensitive to your old friends to not connect the old and newer screename identities. In the past, many on these boards have asked: "what ever happened to..."

[HooBoy]

>>>IM Wrote: There is someone who posted in the Street Hustlers forum a new thread then went on to respond to himself, now that is strange <<<

 

There have been several instances where certain individuals posted hateful remarks and then responded to them under different names. I used to delete their access but now I let them play with themselves because they eventually flame out.

 

Funny thing is, Daddy knows who they are and we watch with amusement.

[Guest pickwick]

>Pick,

>

>Seems to me a little insensitive to your old friends to not

>connect the old and newer screename identities. In the

>past, many on these boards have asked: "what ever happened

>to..."

 

 

My old friends already know about the change in my screen name. I emailed them about it at the time.

[Guest DickHo]

RE: Multiple Personalities (3 handles of Eve)

 

Will you all get a room?

[Guest TruthTeller]

RE: Multiple Personalities (3 handles of Eve)

 

>ears?

>yer good

>but never premature

>Say it ain't so. I've heard otherwise ;-)

 

These are really great contributions - just fascinating, insightful, novel commentary. What's even more amazing and impressive is that it took you only 4 posts to amass this brilliance.

 

As long as you're around to spit out such gems, hooboy doesn't have to worry about low attendence. Who would miss this?

 

The giggly one-word responsive dribble from deej is almost just as good.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Multiple Evils

 

Truth Teller (sic) should tell us all of the different screen names he posts under.

[Guest TruthTeller]

RE: Multiple Evils

 

>Truth Teller (sic) should tell us all of the different

>screen names he posts under.

 

Dear "Lucky,"

 

I wish you weren't so stupid, and therefore so impoverished, so that I could bet you money that I don't post here under a single fucking other name.

 

What's amusing is that you keep insisting that I post here under different screen names, while this ExFartBoy thing speculates in your ratings that "Lucky" is my other screen name.

 

It's pathetic enough that you actually care about who is posting here under which screen names; it makes it so much more pitiful that you're also so wrong.

 

Please go slit your own throat. Thank you.

[Guest Konga]

RE: Single Hateful Personality

 

>These are really great contributions...<

 

Thanks. Glad a numbskull like you could appreciate my Hemingway impersonation. You're just sore cuz I called your number with such eloquence in my comments when I bothered to rate your sorry ass.

 

Speaking of great contributions, here's a random sampling of the good cheer dispensed with such verve by the enigmatic TT:

 

>You're fucking delusional

>you - like a good obedient dog

>Crawl over here

>You are VERY cutthroat

>is best friends with his mom (whose hole is also dirty)

>a pointless twat

>in the vast expanse of your head

>I *do* think you're silly and dumb

>I don't know for certain that your hole, and your mother's hole, are dirty

 

And the topper:

 

>Please go slit your own throat<

 

This dude is a fucking menace. A festering boil on the already cratered butt of this site. He should be lanced, or at least heavily opiated at once.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Multiple Evils

 

If my throat gets slit, it will be by a big dick, not your warm invitation.

[Guest WetDream]

RE: A Suggestion

 

"Truth Teller (sic) should tell us all of the different screen names he posts under."

 

Maybe TT should change is name to Miss Nomer.

:*

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Multiple Evils

 

>If my throat gets slit, it will be by a big dick

 

Hey, can I get a piece of that action?

[BewareofNick]

You mean like TFNH and his alter ego? That little situation was a trip....

[Scorpio]

I don't really understand the need for multiple screen names in a forum like this. After all it's already anonymous, just say what you have to say and be done with it. Why create multiple characters just to agree with yourself? Is the validation that important? However, that being said, as I stated in another post many moons ago just because two or more people seem to be of a like mind on a particular subject (while the rest of us are in disagreement) doesn't mean that those posters in the minority are necessarily the same person.

 

However, I recently became aware of what I'm certain is an escort's alter-ego (i.e., posing as his own client) in order to do a little self-promotion. And if I'm correct in my assumptions I must admit that I'm disappointed in this person, because that means the escort has also written at least one of his own reviews. I don't mind the self-promotion by escorts (I like it when it's done out the open and we all know what's going on), but I don't think posing as your own client to promote yourself is appropriate...it lacks a certain objectivity. I suppose if you live up to the self-promotion it's somewhat justified, but can't say that I really like.:-(

 

By the way, my suspicions are only circumstantial so I'm not going to try and "out" anyone. But I'll be watching to see if this gets too out hand and in the meantime I'll try to confirm or disprove my suspicions.

[Guest jeffOH]

I don't understand the need for multiple names either. Regulation,

Pickwick, TruthTeller, delhi, lambchop, creosote, cassius, clemencee

and any others I may have left out. And no, the idea of multiple personalities doesn't just come up when someone disagrees with your

opinions. All someone has to do is look at all the ratings of other

posters by these names and you see a pattern. We're not that stupid.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[HooBoy]

>You mean like TFNH and his alter ego? That little situation

>was a trip....

 

I really do not know what you mean about TTNH and I do not want to know. I believe STONGLY that unless one has FIRM evidence, he should not post allegations as fact. I appreciate your dilgence in routing out frauds, however I cringe at the thought of everyone coming under suspicion for one thing or another by the "thought police".

 

Know what I mean? :-)

[Guest pickwick]

>We're not that

>stupid.

>

 

I think you are stupid, Jeff. Based on your posts here and on the emails you have sent me, you think FFF is some other prostitute with whom you have some sort of feud going. This feud seems very important to you. Although I have said some complimentary things about you and to you on the board and in emails in the past, when I ventured to disagree with some of your negative remarks about FFF you began trashing me as well. I don't care to be involved in something as trivial and distasteful as a cat fight between two hookers, so leave me out of it. I'll check back later to see who won.

[Traveller]

HooBoy,

 

You are my idol. Thanks for keeping my identity a secret. Jennifer was getting a bit worried.

 

All the best,

 

Brad.

[Guest jeffOH]

>>We're not that

>>stupid.

>>

>

>I think you are stupid, Jeff. Based on your posts here and

>on the emails you have sent me, you think FFF is some other

>prostitute with whom you have some sort of feud going. This

>feud seems very important to you. Although I have said some

>complimentary things about you and to you on the board and

>in emails in the past, when I ventured to disagree with some

>of your negative remarks about FFF you began trashing me as

>well. I don't care to be involved in something as trivial

>and distasteful as a cat fight between two hookers, so leave

>me out of it. I'll check back later to see who won.

 

Too late, Picky. You and your multiples have trashed me enough.

There is no fight, cat or otherwise here. Just a quest for the TRUTH.

Hide behind as many names as you want, but your transparency is obvious to many. Pickwick, TruthTeller, Regulation, delhi, spendlove,

cassius, clemencee, lambchop, creosote and all the others you cower

behind and spew your own brand of negativity. Of course you would disagree with my remarks re: FFF, you two share so many traits.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[+ Lucky]

Jeff, I agree with you on this one! Are you a Yankees fan, though?

[Guest pickwick]

>

>Too late, Picky. You and your multiples have trashed me

>enough.

>There is no fight, cat or otherwise here. Just a quest for

>the TRUTH.

 

And what TRUTH is that? You emailed me with a number of accusations about FFF, such as that he is really an escort and is also a meth addict (is "meth" the correct word?). So now that I know that, what do I do? Ignore everything he says on those grounds? But you are an escort too. And you have said on this board that you are also an addict or alcoholic. So must I ignore you as well? Okay.

 

 

>Hide behind as many names as you want, but your transparency

>is obvious to many. Pickwick, TruthTeller, Regulation,

>delhi, spendlove,

>cassius, clemencee, lambchop, creosote and all the others

>you cower

>behind and spew your own brand of negativity. Of course you

>would disagree with my remarks re: FFF, you two share so

>many traits.

>

 

As I said in a previous post, Jeff, there are precious few regular posters on this board who can claim they have not made negative remarks about other posters, and the members of that very small group do not include me or YOU either. That is true, is it not?

 

So what is really going on here is that you are yelling at FFF, TT, me and others for doing pretty much the same thing you have done on other occasions when it suited you. I really don't see how that allows you to cast yourself as a crusader for righteousness. If righteousness is what you seek, reform your own behavior first and maybe then you can start in on others. You certainly are in no position to do it now.

[Guest jeffOH]

Mr. Copy Paste and Dissect,(Pickwick)

 

I quit drinking 13 years ago. What's your point in bringing that up?

 

Whether you pay attention to or ignore another poster is irrelevant.

Nor am I on some "righteous crusade". Every word you and your

various names utter drip with condescension. You're not even clever enough to make your multiples sound like different people. They are

all incredibly one-dimensional and predictable. They come out of the woodwork like cockroaches to provide a backup chorus for your cowardly comments. I am sick of it. I have never attacked or maligned anyone on this site without provocation. You on the other hand seem

to thrive in a cesspool of negativity.

 

Really, at this point what you have to say on ANYTHING is complete and utter crap to me. I, for one, am not in the least intimidated by

you and your many "personalities". I don't post on here to win some

kind of popularity contest. So, I'll say whatever I damned well please as you do. And if I think you're posting under different names

I'll say so. If you don't like it, take the advice of "Regulation"..

DON'T READ IT !! That's my plan as long as I am not attacked or maligned without reason. But, if you want to play games...bring it on.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[Guest jeffOH]

>As I said in a previous post, Jeff, there are precious few

>regular posters on this board who can claim they have not

>made negative remarks about other posters, and the members

>of that very small group do not include me or YOU either.

>That is true, is it not?

>

>So what is really going on here is that you are yelling at

>FFF, TT, me and others for doing pretty much the same thing

>you have done on other occasions when it suited you. I

>really don't see how that allows you to cast yourself as a

>crusader for righteousness. If righteousness is what you

>seek, reform your own behavior first and maybe then you can

>start in on others. You certainly are in no position to do

>it now.

 

This is your same BULLSHIT argument that you trot out anytime some

responds to a personal attack. I have NEVER attacked someone without

provocation. You(and All your personalities)and FFF gleefully instigate and provoke. So, I am NOT doing the same thing you and FFF

do. There is a difference. It's no wonder you don't know what TRUTH I am talking about. When you live in a world of LIES you begin to believe the illusion you've created is real. Sad!

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[Guest pickwick]

>This is your same BULLSHIT argument that you trot out

>anytime some

>responds to a personal attack. I have NEVER attacked someone

>without

>provocation. You(and All your personalities)and FFF

>gleefully instigate and provoke. So, I am NOT doing the same

>thing you and FFF

>do. There is a difference. It's no wonder you don't know

>what TRUTH I am talking about. When you live in a world of

>LIES you begin to believe the illusion you've created is

>real. Sad!

>

 

No, Jeff, there is no difference except in your imagination. No one can force you to engage in personal attacks on others. It is a choice you make. And you need to take responsibility for it rather than try to weasel out by blaming someone else. I thought that was one of the things the twelve-step programs teach people: take responsibility for your own actions. Apparently you missed that meeting. As I said, you have chosen to attack others whenever it suited you, and you also malign others for doing the same thing. You are no better than anyone else here, and your attempt to pretend that you are is indeed sad.

 

Again, I really don't know what is behind the feud between you and FFF or whoever you claim he is. He called you some names, no doubt. You did the same to him. You seem to think that makes you better than him. It doesn't. Someone who is pushing 40 should certainly be able to understand that. It's been said by many people here. If you object to name calling, don't do it. If you do it, don't criticize others for doing the same thing you do.