Rentmen.eu vs rent.men

[rustyrex]

Welp, the eu site has taken away the free naughty pics too…ugh….

[NJF]

4 hours ago, rustyrex said:

Welp, the eu site has taken away the free naughty pics too…ugh….

Yeah we tipped RM off by talking it too much here 😂.

[Simon Suraci]

Did a little experiment today uploading a naughty photo to my public gallery. It shows on my end when I am signed in that the photo is in my public gallery and visible. When I log out and view my ad, the naughty photo is blurred and when I click on it, the site prompts me to upgrade to view it. RM is deliberately showing advertisers one thing and clients another. I’m boycotting by not posting nudes until RM changes their policy.

[Nightowl]

40 minutes ago, Simon Suraci said:

Did a little experiment today uploading a naughty photo to my public gallery. It shows on my end when I am signed in that the photo is in my public gallery and visible. When I log out and view my ad, the naughty photo is blurred and when I click on it, the site prompts me to upgrade to view it. RM is deliberately showing advertisers one thing and clients another. I’m boycotting by not posting nudes until RM changes their policy.

If they’ve put your nude pics behind a paywall you should get a cut of the profits.

[DMonDude]

1 hour ago, Simon Suraci said:

Did a little experiment today uploading a naughty photo to my public gallery. It shows on my end when I am signed in that the photo is in my public gallery and visible. When I log out and view my ad, the naughty photo is blurred and when I click on it, the site prompts me to upgrade to view it. RM is deliberately showing advertisers one thing and clients another. I’m boycotting by not posting nudes until RM changes their policy.

I think that's because you were viewing while not signed into any account. A client account should still be able to see that public nude. I can see public nudes still, but if i log out of my free client account entirely, then that's when i see what you saw with the nudes all being blurred and i get a prompt to login/subscribe. But if you go in to create an account, you still have the option to just setup a free account. They're basically trying to get a new user to go right to make a paid account, but at least as of right now, if they make a free account they still can see the public nudes, but the new user doesn't know that of course. It's a sneaky tactic to point a new user to the paid tier on initial sign up by making them think nudes all require a Premium account even though they actually don't at the moment.

Not to say you shouldn't boycott or do whatever you're going to do, just sharing what i found is happening.

Edited yesterday at 12:19 AM by DMonDude

[+ mds1]

2 hours ago, Simon Suraci said:

Did a little experiment today uploading a naughty photo to my public gallery. It shows on my end when I am signed in that the photo is in my public gallery and visible. When I log out and view my ad, the naughty photo is blurred and when I click on it, the site prompts me to upgrade to view it. RM is deliberately showing advertisers one thing and clients another. I’m boycotting by not posting nudes until RM changes their policy.

I know one escort that put all of his pictures on a Twitter account (that he doesn’t use normally, he only created it for naughty pictures) and then he linked that Twitter to his ad. This might be a way around the issue, maybe? Not ideal, but it gets pictures to us clients for free.

[Simon Suraci]

5 hours ago, DMonDude said:

I think that's because you were viewing while not signed into any account. A client account should still be able to see that public nude. I can see public nudes still, but if i log out of my free client account entirely, then that's when i see what you saw with the nudes all being blurred and i get a prompt to login/subscribe. But if you go in to create an account, you still have the option to just setup a free account. They're basically trying to get a new user to go right to make a paid account, but at least as of right now, if they make a free account they still can see the public nudes, but the new user doesn't know that of course. It's a sneaky tactic to point a new user to the paid tier on initial sign up by making them think nudes all require a Premium account even though they actually don't at the moment.

Not to say you shouldn't boycott or do whatever you're going to do, just sharing what i found is happening.

Got it. RM uses sneaky language; they make it seem like you have to be a logged-in member AND pay the premium subscription fee to view provider nudes. Many would be clients won’t know this and either give up on viewing providers’ nudes (probably most) or go ahead and pay the small unnecessary premium. RM wins gravy money while providers lose out on prospective business.

4 hours ago, mds1 said:

I know one escort that put all of his pictures on a Twitter account (that he doesn’t use normally, he only created it for naughty pictures) and then he linked that Twitter to his ad. This might be a way around the issue, maybe? Not ideal, but it gets pictures to us clients for free.

Great idea. This is one way to work around it, just like linking to the provider’s business website. Unfortunately only a fraction of viewers will click through to visit a twitter or other social page or a business website. 

Given the number of clients who only look at pictures and don’t read the ad copy before contacting, it might be reaching for the stars to ask someone to go to a social platform or website.

[+ jimbosf]

8 hours ago, Simon Suraci said:

Unfortunately only a fraction of viewers will click through to visit a twitter or other social page or a business website. 

I am probably the odd person out...but I actually read the text on ads in addition to viewing the photos.  I always check the contact info of someone I am interested in to see if they have provided a twitter link in addition to their number.  

[Simon Suraci]

6 hours ago, jimbosf said:

I am probably the odd person out...but I actually read the text on ads in addition to viewing the photos.  I always check the contact info of someone I am interested in to see if they have provided a twitter link in addition to their number.  

CoM members represent an odd man out contingency. Most of the clients here are thoughtful and respectful, and many of you take time to review ads more carefully. The average client doesn’t, and certainly not the least common denominator. 

It also depends on how interested a client is in someone based solely on the photos whether they will take the next step to read the whole ad or visit any links to learn more. 

The more info we can include directly on the ad, the more likely the average viewer is to view or take note of it. Clicking through a link is easy, but it does present a psychological barrier that will stop some from proceeding.

[sydneyboy]

On 9/7/2025 at 10:57 PM, Pensant said:

I’m not a fan of sites and businesses that changed things when things didn’t need changing, especially when the replacement is sub-par.

How true! The classic example is Planet Romeo. The “new” site is years old but for the life of me I have never been able to navigate it.