Thoughts on 4-hands?

[jclimcaco]

Thinking of trying it out but wanted to hear from guys who have done it.

 

What’s the expectation and did you leave happy? Would you rather spend that money on longer time with one person? What were the dynamics during the session?

 

Any recommendation for NYC-based masseurs would also be appreciated!

 

Please PM me if you have *details* you wanna share.

[stop]

I have had a few. The hands down best one was a hot couple that used to do one session Friday and one Saturday and they only did 90 minute sessions. It was both a fantastic massage and great fun. I think I was there for about 4 hours. There were lots of erotic elements during the actual massage and these guys were really in tune with each other and only worked as a pair. There was also a clear ending to the massage and non massage related activities. They alas are no longer doing massage.

 

Others I have had have varied based on if they had worked together a lot before and had actual massage experience. Once it was a masseur and his boyfriend and the BF did not know what he was doing and it was very distracting.

 

There is really something amazing about having two folks in synch massaging you. But not something I could or would do regularly

[SamMiller213]

I had one 4-hands in San Diego a while back with two guys that don’t look like they’re advertising anymore. I had high hopes but was disappointed. The massage itself was decent but it’s kind of interesting having different parts worked on at once - almost like sensory overload and for me I wasn’t able to enjoy it as much as there was too much going on.

 

It’s also an unusual dynamic especially if both of the masseurs are clothed and you’re not (as was the case). For me there was much less of a connection than a 1:1. I wouldn’t repeat.

[EastbayMike]

I've had a few (3?) and was always disappointed with the dynamics. I much prefer the fraternity I feel with a one on one.

[LoveAGoodMassage]

I have a few, loved them. If the two are a couple, I have found they are more likely to be playful with me and each other, making it a quick road to a threesome. I have had one where the lead was highly dominated over the second making it uncomfortable for both of us. It isn’t a training session.

 

Try being blindfolded, a suggestion from one 4 hand couple. It made it more erotic, didn’t know where the hands, body and/or parts were. It was a totally “hard” 90 minutes, for all of us. Didn’t know who was cumming or going, lol

[Trick]

Just like with one on one meetings with providers, the experience with 4-hands depends on the dynamics of the people involved. For me, it’s a hit or miss. I can remember about 3-4 encounters that were good and about the same number that I would never book again.

Edited August 27, 2020 by Trick

[northend_stv]

I’ve had one - it was choreographed and mechanical. They were a couple and while it was nice to have two people working on me, I felt like it was extra money that was not worth it. I’ll stick to singles.

[dfwmassagelover]

they can be ok, but I agree sensory overload. I prefer a longer session with one person I enjoy.

[+ sam.fitzpatrick]

I have had several four-handed massages. For several years I saw a couple for tandem massages about every six weeks. The massages were very good. One was licensed and many times, the massages were at least partially choreographed. There's something wonderful about getting you scalp massaged by one guy to relax you while the other is applying deep pressure to get a knot out our your calf.

 

I have found that while I prefer a 90-minute massage when with one provider, I prefer an hour session with the tandem massage.

[BigNoiseDallas]

I've had several 4-handed sessions and they varied in quality. The best were from two therapists who were also a couple -- one full-time and licensed, the other had a lot of training (no license) and had a full-time job, but coordinating schedules wasn't an issue. Not only were they highly skilled, they were two hot men who incorporated the technical, sensual, and erotic aspects really well into a great overall experience. Sadly, they relocated and are now out of the massage business entirely -- the one who had the full-time job here went into business for himself in their new location, and the full-time guy retired earlier this year to help with the business.

[Muscleking]

For me Really depends both masseurs need to be equally good at what they’re doing because if one is better than the other than it’s just not a pleasurable experience I’ve had it a few times where both of the masseurs were really great but I also had it were one was great and the other was pretty shitty so I wish I was with the one that was great. All in all I prefer 1 really good masseur at a time.

[MxB]

I'll chime in with another "sensory overload" comment.

 

I haven't had many 4-handed massages. Still, the few times I've done it, I discovered that I prefer just one masseur so I can focus on enjoying what's happening. For me, I didn't like having to split my attention to two areas.

[dutchal]

I've had several 4-handed sessions and they varied in quality.

Same experience here. All the more reason to check with this board to see how things go with the pair you're considering.

[BeefyDude]

I'm really mixed on this question which is why ive not chimed in yet.

 

I have only had a few. Mostly I don't due to cost.

 

It really depends on who is doing it. I would also say 4hand on a table way better than on a bed.

 

ONE couple was great IMO (it was heaven - they were in total sync. My brain was in overload as one part of my body was getting worked on and wow another part is at the same time). If it is done properly and the 2 are in sync, then I think it is a great experience!!

 

Rest were not. The Ezra/Mason combo was on the NOT side (but I hear they broke up now so...)

[jeezifonly]

I have done 2 four-handers. One had that sensory overload thing- not symetrical in any way re body location, nor similar in the approach and pressure. I usually participate with breathing to use the exhale that helps relax muscles but when the hands are not of the one mind, all that gets wasted. Where they did sync up was on the sensual play and release.

The other 2-man service was in a spa setting, and the hands were exactly symmetrical in location and touch throughout - definitely the better option for theraputic, which is all they offered.

If I did hire another 2 man team it will be for sensual, less focus on the technical, which really only works from a team that works together often enough where they can read MY mind as well as each other’s. Harder to find I think!!

IMHO, Id rather spend the money on two separate providers one at a time.

[+ nycman]

Not worth it.

[PaulM]

I've had two and determined that it was too much sensory overload. Hard to say focused with so many distractions. I prefer a straight up threesome so I don't have to concentrate on the massage

[toddoles]

I've had multiple 4 hand massages and thoroughly enjoyed them. Some were more on the therapeutic end with play at the very end, while others were more play then therapeutic. For me it all depends on what I'm looking for and ensuring I'm communicating that to the masseurs beforehand.

 

I'd do more of the if the cost wasn't so high.

[dbar123]

I've had about 4 different 4-handed massage providers over the past 2 years. It is more like performance art mixed with massage. A very different experience than with a single provider. They were all extremely entertaining for different reasons. Highly recommended.

 

In one case, the two guys screwed each other while one layed over me and massaged me. It was like having live performance porn.

 

Another set of guys had a whole ritual which ended in a very funky climax where one guy had a small drum that he hit while I got jerked off in time with the drum beats which got increasingly faster.

 

Go for it.

[BigNoiseDallas]

Same experience here. All the more reason to check with this board to see how things go with the pair you're considering.

 

I do, but there aren't a lot of 4-hand options here in Dallas these days. There was another couple I saw years ago both in 4-hand sessions and separately, which they seemed to be fine with. But then one flaked on me for a 2-hand, then the partner did the same thing a year later (and they're no longer in the business, either). The ones who are here have mixed reviews, IIRC -- either they're both hit and miss, or one is good while the other is mediocre.

[Love2GetMassaged]

I love 4-handed massages, particularly if there is good chemistry between the 2 masseurs

[Trueblue]

I had a 4 handed massage a long time ago before I joined this site.

They seemed like a couple, and one was a little more flirtatious then the other which was a little uncomfortable..but all ended up being okay.

They no longer advertise.

Would be curious to hear about NY recommendations too.

[rustyrex]

This is an interesting thread, I’ve never done 4 handed but I assumed it would be better. But if it’s more like sensory overload then what’s the point. Massage is supposed to be relaxing, if I wanted sensory overload I’d do a manwich with me in the middle, on poppers, blindfolded, while spinning.

[elsalvador92]

any four hand recommendations in san francisco?

[sycbrooklyn]

I have experienced a couple of 4 handed massages. It is a wonderful experience if the two masseurs are coordinated and in synch. One might take the top half and the other, the lower half, then switch to left and right halves. The pressure needs to be consistent and when done in parallel, it can be incredible. On the other hand, when the two masseurs are not in synch, it can be confusing and distracting. I have only experienced this type of massage in Hong Kong, so I cannot recommend anyone in the US.