"Already had Conavid..."

[Medjock]

Medjock, as the original poster here I just want to say that I didn't mean to attack you personally, much less stir up a storm. Your ad struck me as "first to market" and I commented on that as a novel approach, actually giving you kind of lame compliment for being opportunistic. I'm a consultant who markets myself opportunistically too, so please know i mean this as a compliment too, not a criticism.

 

Do admit, however, that you were vague about your credentials in healthcare on a platform where there is a lot of spin in the pitches. The vagueness made me suspicious when I could have given you the benefit of the doubt. I see your point, own that and apologize for the comment about your ad copy being bullshitty. You've done a very good job of clearing up the vagueness. I do admire your professional ambitions as well as your willingness to engage here and stick up for yourself. And I wish you the best.

 

The vagueness is because i'm very discreet. I don't like advertising to the world all of my business. If a client asks, I will tell them. You can message any of the clients that left reviews. Most of them know I was in pharmacy school. But i do understand where you're coming from and i apologize for the confusion. Anyone is free to message me and ask in the future though.

[Monarchy79]

Well thankfully it's not my life career.”

 

Contradiction Alert ? :

 

One minute, you’re bragging about how escorting has paid for your “education”.

 

The next minute, you’re thanking God that escorting isn’t your life career.

 

You can’t swing like a pendulum for the convenience or making a point. Not. Very good look for a “Doctor”.

[MrMattBig]

The direction of this thread highlights the limitations of a platform like RM, as well as the difference between career escorting versus not and proactive measures as opposed to reactive measures. In the defense of Medjock, RM's character limit and censoring make it impossible to expand upon his status as recovered, the liklihood of reinfection, and the overall risks involved. Let alone the instances where in a general sense, more times then not someone will not even read the text in the ad. However, this is where personal websites come in, where you can expand on more things, as well as one of the many things that distinguish who treats escorting as a career, or one of their careers if they have multiple. Additionally, this would be a proactive measure, as opposed to reactive, which more times than not will come off as overly defensive.

His first message yesterday was in my opinion perfectly fine; every message after that has been a shot in the foot over and over and over. If you really want to clap back, you have to learn how to do it in one motion. Anything else will start to have the opposite effect.

 

Maybe this is the intended result, to foster a obnoxious, masculine jock image. If it is, more power to you @Medjock

If it's not, then be mindful of the obnoxious perception that is brewing by your responses.

[former lurker]

The direction of this thread highlights the limitations of a platform like RM, as well as the difference between career escorting versus not and proactive measures as opposed to reactive measures. In the defense of Medjock, RM's character limit and censoring make it impossible to expand upon his status as recovered, the liklihood of reinfection, and the overall risks involved. Let alone the instances where in a general sense, more times then not someone will not even read the text in the ad. However, this is where personal websites come in, where you can expand on more things, as well as one of the many things that distinguish who treats escorting as a career, or one of their careers if they have multiple. Additionally, this would be a proactive measure, as opposed to reactive, which more times than not will come off as overly defensive.

His first message yesterday was in my opinion perfectly fine; every message after that has been a shot in the foot over and over and over. If you really want to clap back, you have to learn how to do it in one motion. Anything else will start to have the opposite effect.

 

Maybe this is the intended result, to foster a obnoxious, masculine jock image. If it is, more power to you @Medjock

If it's not, then be mindful of the obnoxious perception that is brewing by your responses.

 

You make perfect sense. As I read the posts attacking him, and those by him, my impression is that there is room for criticism on both sides of the debate. However, he is the provider and the focus, so it doesn't serve him well to get into spats with other posters regardless of whether those posters are excessive in their criticisms. If he felt the need to clarify, he should leave it at that and not engage the personality of an opposing poster.

 

I agree about the limits of RM as a venue for clear expression. More broadly, communicating online, even through posts on forums such as this one, have their limits. Tone, personality, openness or rigidity, etc, are all less clear in print than live/in person/on the phone. That said, to avoid painting oneself in an unfavorable light, the limits of the media have to be taken into account. More measured language that is less susceptible to negative interpretations is warranted.

[Medjock]

Contradiction Alert ? :

 

One minute, you’re bragging about how escorting has paid for your “education”.

 

The next minute, you’re thanking God that escorting isn’t your life career.

 

You can’t swing like a pendulum for the convenience or making a point. Not. Very good look for a “Doctor”.

 

I know you're baiting me because i said i wasn't going to respond to you again and i know you're going to use that against me when i reply because you have zero intelligence. let's logically look at this.

 

Point one: I used escorting to pay for school. no where did I say it was a passion of mine or say I wanted to be an escort for the rest of my life. It was a tool i used to avoid financial debt in the future.

 

Point two: Someone said i don't have people skills, to which i sarcastically stated, thank God it's not my life career. Meaning I have a career in place that will support me if/when i stop escorting.

 

Those two points are not mutually exclusive. They can both be true. Yes escorting paid for school and I'm thankful for that. And yes thank God i have a career to fall back on if my people skills are not up to par with being an escort.

 

You are making a fool out of yourself. I know you're just trying to find holes in my story/posts to make me look bad and its honestly backfiring. Stop while you're ahead.

 

And now ill wait for the next post about me answering you after i said i wouldn't because again, you have zero intelligence and nothing of substance to add.

Edited April 27, 2020 by Medjock

[Medjock]

The direction of this thread highlights the limitations of a platform like RM, as well as the difference between career escorting versus not and proactive measures as opposed to reactive measures. In the defense of Medjock, RM's character limit and censoring make it impossible to expand upon his status as recovered, the liklihood of reinfection, and the overall risks involved. Let alone the instances where in a general sense, more times then not someone will not even read the text in the ad. However, this is where personal websites come in, where you can expand on more things, as well as one of the many things that distinguish who treats escorting as a career, or one of their careers if they have multiple. Additionally, this would be a proactive measure, as opposed to reactive, which more times than not will come off as overly defensive.

His first message yesterday was in my opinion perfectly fine; every message after that has been a shot in the foot over and over and over. If you really want to clap back, you have to learn how to do it in one motion. Anything else will start to have the opposite effect.

 

Maybe this is the intended result, to foster a obnoxious, masculine jock image. If it is, more power to you @Medjock

If it's not, then be mindful of the obnoxious perception that is brewing by your responses.

 

Yes i guess i got caught up in my emotions when i first read the thread. It was late at night and I was PISSED. Not one person who posted took the time to message me to clarify what i meant in my ad. And you are 100% right about the limitations. As you can tell from most of my posts, I type a lot. Trying to fit everything into 1200 characters is not my forte. So i had to make it short and to the point. As far as a website, i have zero idea how to do that. I suppose I could look into it. It's never crossed my mind that so many of you were thinking this but never said anything. I've had numerous people message me about it and thought everyone would do that if they had questions. That is definitely my mistake. Thank you for pointing this out to me

[sutherland]

I see a psychiatrist once a month.

[Monarchy79]

I know you're baiting me because i said i wasn't going to respond to you again and i know you're going to use that against me when i reply because you have zero intelligence. But i just want to point out that you said you taught logic which I'm finding very hard to believe.... let's logically look at this.

 

Point one: I used escorting to pay for school. no where did I say it was a passion of mine or say I wanted to be an escort for the rest of my life. It was a tool i used to avoid financial debt in the future.

 

Point two: Someone said i don't have people skills, to which i sarcastically stated, thank God it's not my life career. Meaning I have a career in place that will support me if/when i stop escorting.

 

Those two points are not mutually exclusive. They can both be true. Yes escorting paid for school and I'm thankful for that. And yes thank God i have a career to fall back on if my people skills are not up to par with being an escort.

 

You are making a fool out of yourself. I know you're just trying to find holes in my story/posts to make me look bad and its honestly backfiring. Stop while you're ahead.

 

And now ill wait for the next post about me answering you after i said i wouldn't because again, you have zero intelligence and nothing of substance to add.

 

I’m not trying to make you look bad....

you’re doing an excellent job of that, all on your own ?

[MrMattBig]

Yes i guess i got caught up in my emotions when i first read the thread. It was late at night and I was PISSED. Not one person who posted took the time to message me to clarify what i meant in my ad. And you are 100% right about the limitations. As you can tell from most of my posts, I type a lot. Trying to fit everything into 1200 characters is not my forte. So i had to make it short and to the point. As far as a website, i have zero idea how to do that. I suppose I could look into it. It's never crossed my mind that so many of you were thinking this but never said anything. I've had numerous people message me about it and thought everyone would do that if they had questions. That is definitely my mistake. Thank you for pointing this out to me

Things to consider when having any presence online: People will always talk about you 'behind your back'. I wouldn't call this thread behind your back really though, because you can view these discussions. People may be talking more negatively about you in private messages to each other, who knows. But people will always talk about you rather then ask directly. Nature of the internet, even more so than death and taxes. Nothing personal, the tone you use to expect someone ask you directly, and get even more so offended at perceiving this as talk behind your back, and the tone of your defenses, sounds like you still need some life experience on human interaction. Nothing wrong with that, but use that as a humbling reality of the perception of your communication, the differing demands of escorting versus your medical schooling/career track, and the differences between a front facing versus back facing career in relation to interaction with people/patients.

[Medjock]

 

yes for adderall. glad you were paying attention. as per your first post. I don't appreciate you trying to make my statement into something it clearly wasn't. My statement had nothing to do with gender identity or stereotypes and it certainly was not homophobic. Why don't you chastise the person who thought it was ok to say i wasn't a man but a woman (aka you)? If defending myself and saying I'm a man is wrong, then I'm wrong.

[Monarchy79]

IAnd now ill wait for the next post about me answering you after i said i wouldn't because again, you have zero intelligence and nothing of substance to add.

 

Let me get this right,

You have two Doctorates, and that’s your best attempt of “reverse psychology”?

 

You’re giving me a belly ache over here... ?????

Edited April 27, 2020 by Monarchy79

[Medjock]

I’m not trying to make you look bad....

you’re doing an excellent job of that, all on your own ?

 

another useless/ substance-less response. congrats. and no i have a PharmD and I'm going for a MD next. reading is not your forte. Anyway, now you're just saying anything that pops into your head without thinking and it's not worth my time to respond anymore. I'm getting private messages about how dumb you sound and that i shouldn't engage anymore because it's borderline cringe-worthy at this point. Now this will be my last response to you. I don't know who hurt you but I honestly hope you find peace. take care

[coriolis888]

 

 

Let me get this right,

 

You have two PhD’s, and that’s your best attempt of “reverse psychology”?

 

You’re giving me a belly ache over here... ?????

 

 

In reading through his posts, he did not say he has " two PhD’s", as you wrote.

 

He said he earned a doctorate in pharmacology and will be attending medical school to earn a medical degree.

[+ nycman]

It is infuriating to see so many people talk negatively about me as if they know me.

No doubt.

Reading other people’s unvarnished, and often ill informed options about one’s self can be hurtful.

But remember they are just that...opinions.

This misinformed thread is damaging to my brand

Mostly because of your responses.

Not because of the initial debate.

You need to try and understand that and learn from it.

and ill be damned if i don't defend myself.

One short post explaining yourself and the logic behind your RM ad would have done that nicely.

The rest?....is like a child playing with a loaded gun. It’s very dangerous....especially to your “ brand”.

[Monarchy79]

In reading through his posts, he did not say he has " two PhD’s", as you wrote.

 

He said he earned a doctorate in pharmacology and will be attending medical school to earn a medical degree.

 

I stand corrected.

[Monarchy79]

I'm getting private messages about how dumb you sound and that i shouldn't engage anymore because it's borderline cringe-worthy at this point.

 

Unlike you, I don’t concern myself with the opinions of others. Enjoy those private messages, they could possibly result in being potential clients. ☺️

 

You do understand that your concern with others’ opinions, and your dogmatic determination to “prove your point”, is what got your pressure all up and your feelings in a tizzy, right?

[Monarchy79]

Now this will be my last response to you.

 

Didn’t you say the same thing around 5 responses ago? ?

[Gymowner]

My god.... give this guy a fuckin break already! How many of you sing the praises of douche bag escorts that are scum bags just because their arms are over 18" or their dicks are over 8"? They can do no wrong in some of your eyes.

 

If you dont like the dude it's simple. Dont hire him and move on!

[jjkrkwood]

This is my last response to you since you have nothing intelligent to say. I have made several attempts to educate and defend my reasoning using the scientific knowledge we have today and you still continue with your baseless accusations and insults. You clearly are a miserable person and I genuinely hope that changes for you. Be safe and God bless you.

 

[+ harey]

Hey guys, it's hotmedpro. I'm reading all of your posts and I'm kind of laughing. I will go over all of your concerns since you guys think you know it all. One, yes I did just finish my doctorate in Pharmacy. My graduation ceremony was supposed to be in May but it's cancelled (yes I'm annoyed by that but I'm interviewing for MD programs so I'm finding solace in the fact that ill have that graduation ceremony when i finish med school) Two, the WHO says there's no evidence that antibodies provide immunity from reinfection but it doesn't say that there's evidence showing it doesn't. Many countries are contemplating providing immunity cards, and the WHO is being overly cautious. At this point right now, the virus is mutating slower than the seasonal flu which is great especially for vaccines and for antibody immunity. Antibodies are made specifically for a virus, like a lock and key. But when a virus mutates, the key (antibody) doesn't fit in the lock (virus) anymore. That is one of the reasons why creating a vaccine for HIV has been impossible to do; It mutates too rapidly but that's a different story. As far as the stories of reinfection occurring in other countries, many things could have caused that, one of them (and most likely) is human error. Earlier testing kits (and even some now) were shown to be extremely unreliable. That can be explained by the sensitivity of the tests and/or classic mix ups in the labs (it happens). There are several different tests available and each of them looked for specific genetic material from the virus, so if the sample collected from the patient didn't have enough genetic material (someone who recently became infected) or if it was collected wrong, the test would read negative. Also some of the earlier testing kits only had two sets of probes to detect the virus and now have three. Probes are used to detect coronavirus RNA sequences in RT-PCR tests and show up fluorescent if positive. These probes influence the sensitivity of the tests. There were also some kits that gave positive readings with just water in a negative control experiment. The test manufactured by Roche has a sensitivity of 95% meaning that 5% of infected people could be missed by their test. I know first hand that patients from my hospital were coming up negative according to in-house labs, but were actually positive when sent out to the CDC for testing. So what that means is, someone could have been negative but showed up "positive" on the test, then "recovered", went home and became "reinfected" but in reality, it was their first infection. Or the patient could have truly been positive, came up "negative" when retested on a faulty test but was actually still positive, went home and got worse, and came back "reinfected" but in reality, they were positive the entire time. Another reason for possible positive results after recovering is that the tests are picking up traces of virus that are dead which happened to be the case with some patients in South Korea after a doctor tried to incubate the virus but wasn't able to. Is there a chance that people can became reinfected? Sure there is. Everyone's immune system is different. Some people might not produce a heavy antibody response to the infection. That's fair to say. But I'm happy to provide anyone with my antibody test results. I will be getting that done soon. Again, the WHO is being super overly cautious about this and i totally understand that. Lives are at stake. But everything I have read so far points to a stable, slowly mutating virus. And as someone pointed out already, you don't have to hire me. It doesn't bother me one bit. I just wanted you guys to understand why I put that in my ad. It has nothing to do with wanting to make money, and it certainly isn't because I don't care about people's lives. Anyway, be safe out there.

Specious reasoning.

[hypothetically]

This pitch caught my eye this morning. Service provider whose ad now leads with "fact" that he's had the virus, and is past it.

 

https://rentmen.eu/HotMedPro/#platinum

 

First thoughts:

1) Admire his entreprenurial spirit. Think he's identifying a new market, i.e. people who haven't had sex or otherwise been touched for weeks eager to hook up with someone who is allegedly safe/safer.

2) We'll see more of this, the shape of things to come.

3) Ad would be more effective if he posted when he had it.

 

..even if he is indeed being “honest,” and has a health declaration to back up his claim, an antibodies test (if that’s what he’s even insinuating) doesn’t guarantee immunity and he could potentially contract Covid again...if he “had” it.

[Rodrigo Suarez]

[MEDIA=giphy]9frZVeNtxhQ8o[/MEDIA]