Onlyfans Models

[+ Pensant]

Too fem

You think? I think he’s pretty cute and hot. Would love to spend a night with him!

[big-n-tall]

I’m scared of booking providers with Onlyfans accounts. What’s to keep them from secretly filming the session?

 

Not that it's an impossible occurrence, I do think it's a wee bit paranoid.

 

If that's really a concern of yours, then have them come to you at a hotel (or your home if you're comfortable). It'll reduce the chances of them having something set up. And if you're worried they have some type of mini-cam on their person, strip them and inspect everywhere... if you know what I mean. LOL!! Make sure you put their clothes somewhere were it's impossible to see you. Just in case they have some type of recording device attached to their clothing.

 

Problem solved.

[Trick]

 

Not that it's an impossible occurrence, I do think it's a wee bit paranoid.

 

 

Years ago I booked an overnight in Miami. He had an elaborate media setup in his room. There were about 4-5 computer monitors playing different porn videos. About an hour into the session, just as I was beginning to enjoy the action on his sling, a hunch came to my mind. I noticed one of the video “windows” over another window on the screen. I asked for a break and approached the said screen. I was shocked to find that behind the porn video, there was a window of his camera view. He was filming the session. I called him out on it and he assured me he wasn’t posting it anywhere. I left the session in the middle of the night. Up to now, I’m couldn’t help but think there might be a sex video of me floating around in cyberspace.

[lonely_john]

You think? I think he’s pretty cute and hot. Would love to spend a night with him!

Just the fact that he finds Dr. Phil attractive is a HUGE disqualifier. Now, jokes aside, he’s a little fem twink clearly more bottom than anything with an annoying voice that he tries to fake into manly. I’m only into masculine (macho even better) muscular (big plus) men. This kid is the prototype of the ABUNDANT typical queen that anyone can find any given day on Grindr or any other mobile app, no value for me. Only what is scarce has value for me, which is a Top Masculine muscular man. If the facts offend some, to each his own.

[MrMattBig]

Just the fact that he finds Dr. Phil attractive is a HUGE disqualifier. Now, jokes aside, he’s a little fem twink clearly more bottom than anything with an annoying voice that he tries to fake into manly. I’m only into masculine (macho even better) muscular (big plus) men. This kid is the prototype of the ABUNDANT typical queen that anyone can find any given day on Grindr or any other mobile app, no value for me. Only what is scarce has value for me, which is a Top Masculine muscular man. If the facts offend some, to each his own.

This has been an eye opener.

I view him as normal acting, and pretty boy ish...but not fem. His voice is not unlike mine, blend of bass and tenor with a weird tone to it. Really more like a white boy version of myself. I can fuck the shit out of both guys and girls (fast, slow, soft, hard etc), but I wonder now how some view that ability when they come across my profile, if the guy mentioned here is already too fem for some

[lonely_john]

This has been an eye opener.

I view him as normal acting, and pretty boy ish...but not fem. His voice is not unlike mine, blend of bass and tenor with a weird tone to it. Really more like a white boy version of myself. I can fuck the shit out of both guys and girls (fast, slow, soft, hard etc), but I wonder now how some view that ability when they come across my profile, if the guy mentioned here is already too fem for some

In the real world the market is open for everyone to choose from a vast menu. I’m very aware that I’m very OLD old school guy and that’s my reality. In the same way I acknowledge I have a very niche specific taste for what I like that is definitely not the mainstream norm in our society.

[MrMattBig]

In the real world the market is open for everyone to choose from a vast menu. I’m very aware that I’m very OLD old school guy and that’s my reality. In the same way I acknowledge I have a very niche specific taste for what I like that is definitely not the mainstream norm in our society.

I have no problem with you being an older school guy lol. To each is own. Just find it both fascinating and frustrating on how we as a society seem to draw conclusions based off conflating the absence of one thing to be the confirmation of the other.

(Not being a macho top means that person is a fem bottom queen)

I am just basing my comments off the YouTube video, of there is other vids or pics that portray him as a fem queen then I'll stand corrected.

But by the YouTube video alone, I think the fem characterization is a reach, why can't he just simply be not macho enough for your tastes.

Sorry, particularly annoyed at the ineptitude of the world today for person reasons.

Back to regularly scheduled programming

[lonely_john]

I have no problem with you being an older school guy lol. To each is own. Just find it both fascinating and frustrating on how we as a society seem to draw conclusions based off conflating the absence of one thing to be the confirmation of the other.

(Not being a macho top means that person is a fem bottom queen)

I am just basing my comments off the YouTube video, of there is other vids or pics that portray him as a fem queen then I'll stand corrected.

But by the YouTube video alone, I think the fem characterization is a reach, why can't he just simply be not macho enough for your tastes.

Sorry, particularly annoyed at the ineptitude of the world today for person reasons.

Back to regularly scheduled programming

Dear, the absence of one thing is by definition the confirmation of its opposite. « Not being a macho top means that person is a fem bottom queen » Your words, not mine, and I mostly agree ? « he just simply be not macho enough for your (my) tastes » I agree with that too! ? Don’t feel sorry or annoyed by the stupid ideas of inept people that you don’t know, NO NEED. More likely those people couldn’t care less and don’t give a flying f*ck. The world goes on.

[MrMattBig]

Dear, the absence of one thing is by definition the confirmation of its opposite. « Not being a macho top means that person is a fem bottom queen » Your words, not mine, and I mostly agree ? « he just simply be not macho enough for your (my) tastes » I agree with that too! ? Don’t feel sorry or annoyed by the stupid ideas of inept people that you don’t know, NO NEED. More likely those people couldn’t care less and don’t give a flying f*ck. The world goes on.

The quote I said was meant to frame your point of view, not my opinion in terms of words.Absense/confirmation of opposites actually only works when both states are ....finite for lack of better wording . For example Dark/light. There lies a problem though, when its dark/bright. Dark still represents the absence/opposite of light, but bright no longer singularly represents the absence/opposite of dark. The opposite of bright can be dim, small inadequate amount of light, not dark. It still can represent dark however, but that then relies on how a small amount of light is interpreted, becoming a glass half empty/full problem. As long as something is up for interpretation (as sexuality so often is by at least someone) it becomes potentially erroneous to say not macho=fem. Or at the very least different from opinion to opinion, but unlike the glass half full/empty problem, the glass in this situation ( escort/ person being commented on) has its own opinion on what they are as well.

Edited February 5, 2020 by MrMattBig

[KeepItReal]

I have no problem with you being an older school guy lol. To each is own. Just find it both fascinating and frustrating on how we as a society seem to draw conclusions based off conflating the absence of one thing to be the confirmation of the other.

(Not being a macho top means that person is a fem bottom queen)

I am just basing my comments off the YouTube video, of there is other vids or pics that portray him as a fem queen then I'll stand corrected.

But by the YouTube video alone, I think the fem characterization is a reach, why can't he just simply be not macho enough for your tastes.

Sorry, particularly annoyed at the ineptitude of the world today for person reasons.

Back to regularly scheduled programming

There will always be those that make snap judgments based on how they perceive others from just a moment's observation. ?

 

For every one of those, you will find two who are more open minded, usually those tempered by reality, life and experience. Don't let it change how you live your life. You do you! ☺

[lonely_john]

The quote I said was meant to frame your point of view, not my opinion in terms of words.Absense/confirmation of opposites actually only works when both states are ....finite for lack of better wording . For example Dark/light. There lies a problem though, when its dark/bright. Dark still represents the absence/opposite of light, but bright no longer singularly represents the absence/opposite of dark. The opposite of bright can be dim, small inadequate amount of light, not dark. It still can represent dark however, but that then relies on how a small amount of light is interpreted, becoming a glass half empty/full problem. As long as something is up for interpretation (as sexuality so often is by at least someone) it becomes potentially erroneous to say not macho=fem. Or at the very least different from opinion to opinion, but unlike the glass half full/empty problem, the glass in this situation ( escort/ person being commented on) has its own opinion on what they are as well.

Yup! You are right kiddo! It’s all good!

[former lurker]

The quote I said was meant to frame your point of view, not my opinion in terms of words.Absense/confirmation of opposites actually only works when both states are ....finite for lack of better wording . For example Dark/light. There lies a problem though, when its dark/bright. Dark still represents the absence/opposite of light, but bright no longer singularly represents the absence/opposite of dark. The opposite of bright can be dim, small inadequate amount of light, not dark. It still can represent dark however, but that then relies on how a small amount of light is interpreted, becoming a glass half empty/full problem. As long as something is up for interpretation (as sexuality so often is by at least someone) it becomes potentially erroneous to say not macho=fem. Or at the very least different from opinion to opinion, but unlike the glass half full/empty problem, the glass in this situation ( escort/ person being commented on) has its own opinion on what they are as well.

 

Matt, I have to say I respect you for stating your opinion, and explaining it, rather than coddling a contrarion. Some escorts have sought to avoid any conflict on the boards over the years. That's understandable because stating an opinion can put a target on your back, and this is their business. But you should never have to check your mind at the door simply because you escort. Kudos.

[Trick]

Any legit JFF or OF guy will have you sign a model release and provide a government issued ID for age verification. If a video of you surfaces that you did not approve, send a note to either stating it was filmed without your permission. The platform will then take the video down until the model produces the previously mentioned documentation. After a couple of strikes they're normally banned off a platform.

 

Thanks buddy

[former lurker]

Any legit JFF or OF guy will have you sign a model release and provide a government issued ID for age verification. If a video of you surfaces that you did not approve, send a note to either stating it was filmed without your permission. The platform will then take the video down until the model produces the previously mentioned documentation. After a couple of strikes they're normally banned off a platform.

 

Exactly right. If the person is "legit", he will also understand that filming and publishing without the required documents could result in civil claims or criminal charges as well as loss of the platform.

[massageformuscle]

Reno gold is gay and used to escort. Don’t know how permanent his decision is to stop seeing clients. IMHO they don’t come any hotter/sexier than him.

At $500/hr?

[lonely_john]

At $500/hr?

Is this his rate?

[artifact11]

Just reading through this thread- is it true that you cannot message a provider you subscribe to on OF and ask them directly if they are available to escort?

[crushme99]

Just reading through this thread- is it true that you cannot message a provider you subscribe to on OF and ask them directly if they are available to escort?

 

To go a step farther, I take it you must pay and subscribe to the person's OF account before being able to message them at all??

And does OF have some search capabillity?? I've seen none so far.

[massageformuscle]

Is this his rate?

I was quoted that last year, not sure what it is now

[lonely_john]

I was quoted that last year, not sure what it is now

Good lord, there must be people willing to pay for sure, but with that budget I could get 2 real masculine tops. I’m not even sure if this is really a pro or just a kid full of himself who just want to be famous and won’t deliver when facing a real life client who is not young and muscular like all the guys in his videos.[MEDIA=twitter]1208053430528417797[/MEDIA]

Edited February 15, 2020 by lonely_john

[former lurker]

Good lord, there must be people willing to pay for sure, but with that budget I could get 2 real masculine tops. I’m not even sure if this is really a pro or just a kid full of himself who just want to be famous and won’t deliver when facing a real life client who is not young and muscular like all the guys in his videos.[MEDIA=twitter]1208053430528417797[/MEDIA]

 

He has a large following on the web, is "instafamous" and therefore commands a premium. I find your comment about "real masculine tops" offensive. If Reno isn't your type, fine, but this whole bit about whether he's masculine or not is unecessarily judgemental.

[lonely_john]

He has a large following on the web, is "instafamous" and therefore commands a premium. I find your comment about "real masculine tops" offensive. If Reno isn't your type, fine, but this whole bit about whether he's masculine or not is unecessarily judgemental.

Hey @former lurker thanks for your remarks. I promise I will try to keep myself on check in the future. I regret that you feel offended for someone that IS NOT YOU? See, I was actually modifying my original comment but then I said: « What? Stop! F*ck it! Thank God the Internet is (still) a free speech world. Imagine if everyone had to change a comment every single time that someone that is NOT THE ADDRESSED feels offended. Millions of supposedly offensive comments about public figures would have to be taken down. Well, that doesn’t happen. If someone becomes a public figure, must be able to take all kinds of criticism from all corners of the world. I’m all for reasonable political correctness but have a very hard time dealing with unreasonable whining. The words in my comment stay as they are. Again, I will try to be less critical but I truly lost track in time... When did it become a sin to have an opinion about public figures?

Edited February 15, 2020 by lonely_john

[quaero]

I was quoted that last year, not sure what it is now

 

I asked him a few months ago and he quoted me $1000 an hour. He's quite loaded with cash now (he owns property in Miami) so he can choose to charge whatever he wants. And from the number of people he has on his onlyfans page, he must be raking in quite a bit.

[KeepItReal]

Hey @former lurker thanks for your remarks. I promise I will try to keep myself on check in the future. I regret that you feel offended for someone that IS NOT YOU?

Wow! Fake sincerity, followed by a broken promise, topped off with sarcasm. Quite a talent you have there! ?

 

Hey @former lurkerI regret that you feel offended for someone that IS NOT YOU? See, I was actually modifying my original comment but then I said: « What? Stop! F*ck it! Thank God the Internet is (still) a free speech world. Imagine if everyone had to change a comment every single time that someone that is NOT THE ADDRESSED feels offended.

There is a difference between free speech and speech being consequence free. ??

 

You are free to call my sister ugly - after all you are not insulting ME. Won't you be surprised when I knock your teeth out!

 

By your logic, if I am sitting in a restaurant and hear a waiter insult a gay couple, I am not allowed to take offense??

 

Consider the words of Simon Wiesenthal: "For evil to flourish, it only takes good men to do nothing."

 

And can we keep God out of this - you are talking about the "eye for an eye" guy; you may not like where that road takes you.

 

Hey @former lurker Millions of supposedly offensive comments about public figures would have to be taken down. Well, that doesn’t happen. If someone becomes a public figure, must be able to take all kinds of criticism from all corners of the world. I’m all for reasonable political correctness but have a very hard time dealing with unreasonable whining. The words in my comment stay as they are. Again, I will try to be less critical but I truly lost track in time... When did it become a sin to have an opinion about public figures?

These (often) offensive comments are crafted by those we call "trolls".

 

They will say things online that they do not have the courage to say to their target's face. I apply that filter to the words I post online - won't you consider doing the same??

 

I guess my comments here qualify under your definition of whining. And likely it is too verbose - feel free to hit the "verbose" button. I won't be offended.?

 

As was said in an earlier post on this thread, you are entitled to your opinion. Are you open minded enough to consider that your opinion may be wrong??

Edited February 15, 2020 by KeepItReal

[MikeBiDude]

Wow! Fake sincerity, followed by a broken promise, topped off with sarcasm. Quite a talent you have there! ?

 

 

There is a difference between free speech and speech being consequence free. ??

 

You are free to call my sister ugly - after all you are not insulting ME. Won't you be surprised when I knock your teeth out!

 

By your logic, if I am sitting in a restaurant and hear a waiter insult a gay couple, I am not allowed to take offense??

 

Consider the words of Simon Wiesenthal: "For evil to flourish, it only takes good men to do nothing."

 

And can we keep God out of this - you are talking about the "eye for an eye" guy; you may not like where that road takes you.

 

 

These (often) offensive comments are crafted by those we call "trolls".

 

They will say things online that they do not have the courage to say to their target's face. I apply that filter to the words I post online - won't you consider doing the same??

 

I guess my comments here qualify under your definition of whining. And likely it is too verbose - feel free to hit the "verbose" button. I won't be offended.?

 

As was said in an earlier post on this thread, you are entitled to your opinion. Are you open minded enough to consider that your opinion may be wrong??

No wonder he’s lonely @lonely_john

He is a newbie (or a recycle) so there’s that going for his style...