411 TommyColeXXL in NYC

[BonVivant]

1 hour ago, Strafe13 said:

But there were plenty of recent experiences provided -- in fact, EIGHT forum members recounted their experiences with Tommy (5 were good, 3 were kinda meh), all of which were posted within the previous 11 months, including FIVE earlier this year.   There's a frustrating trend on this forum where people will incessantly "bump" 411 threads, where the threads either:

(1) clearly show that forum members don't know anything about the escort who's the subject of the inquiry, but the bumper just keeps on bumping, seemingly to avoid taking that first chance that has to be taken on all new escorts; or

(2) the threads already contain a plethora of relevant information about the escort, such that the bumps would, at best, only yield cumulative results.  Case in point -- the one additional response made after your bump, recounted an experience that wasn't substantively different from those 8 members who'd answered the 411 inquiry in the prior 11 months.  Second case in point -- I'lll offer that my own session with Tommy was largely similar to the majority of the other members' prior experiences.

This wasn't meant as a personal slight against you.  The point of the bump is to "bump" back up to the top of a sub-forum a thread which may have been inadvertently overlooked, so as to increase the chance of that OP's initial inquiry getting addressed.  Repeatedly bumping threads which have already garnered a wealth of responses from our members results in the burying of other threads whose inquiries are just as important, thereby undermining one of this forum's core functions.  That affects the quality of the user experience for all of us, so "ignore and move on" completely misses the mark.

 

Thanks for the detailed explanation of your views. Still…. Bumping is an individual decision of forum member isn’t it? Your guidelines are yours. However if a forum member feels the need to “bump” out of curiosity, they will. Not much you can do about it.
 

However, I agree on your first point in that if there is lack of info, then someone has to go first and report back. Usually it will be an adventurous soul with spare funds. Not someone who is sacred to dip their toe. But still can’t stop a bump. 
 

On your second point, I was actively curious about the provider and wanted to see if there was a more recent experience. And there was. So it achieved my objective. If there had been  no response that would be ok too. In fact that is more telling; fact that a bump gets nada says that there is no forum member willing to give it a go. 
 

 

[LookingAround]

I didn’t know that 8 comments on a person constituted a critical mass. Gee. I thought more input was better. Silly me. 

[Strafe13]

3 hours ago, BonVivant said:

Thanks for the detailed explanation of your views. Still…. Bumping is an individual decision of forum member isn’t it? Your guidelines are yours. However if a forum member feels the need to “bump” out of curiosity, they will. Not much you can do about it.
 

However, I agree on your first point in that if there is lack of info, then someone has to go first and report back. Usually it will be an adventurous soul with spare funds. Not someone who is sacred to dip their toe. But still can’t stop a bump. 
 

On your second point, I was actively curious about the provider and wanted to see if there was a more recent experience. And there was. So it achieved my objective. If there had been  no response that would be ok too. In fact that is more telling; fact that a bump gets nada says that there is no forum member willing to give it a go. 
 

 

Fair enough. I can’t say that you necessarily did anything wrong, and I’m glad you got what you were seeking.  In hindsight, I came across as way more bitchy than I meant to.  That’s what I get for responding in the middle of the night while battling insomnia.  So, you have my apologies for that.  

I’d be happy to discuss my limited experience with Tommy in more detail via private message, if you like.  Good luck in your search.

[bookend]

Had the best experience with him. Felt incredibly connected and engaged. I could not have asked for more.

[bookend]

Amazing hairy body. Took charge, yet felt connected throughout. I didn’t want it to end.

[+ azdr0710]

https://rentmen.eu/TommyColeXXL

[Kevin Slater]

Client just brought him into my place.  I wouldn't call it an abundance of personality.

Kevin Slater

[BonVivant]

Bump. Any recent experiences?

[Cliff]

On 11/27/2022 at 11:59 AM, Kevin Slater said:

Client just brought him into my place.  I wouldn't call it an abundance of personality.

Kevin Slater

Couldn’t agree more. Tommy’s PQ is a solid 4. I mean, out of 30. 

[mikefl81]

His profile expired. Anyone know if he plans to be back soon or is currently taking clients?  Thanks all. 

[LookingAround]

I heard he moved back to the UK. Can anyone verify?