wsc

Most of this kind of outrage seems manufactured by those looking to be offended. And some poor fools say we don't make anything in America anymore! Tsk-tsk!

I don't think the boys dance because they want a Lamborghini but because they need rent money. I find that a little sad, but am happy to help where I can.

I'll try not to beat the dead horse too hard but do wish to clarify my point in the previous post. Neither my question, nor the video, sought to question the existence of gay people, but rather sought to explore their perpetuation and survival in the face of a threat posed by evolutionary processes, particularly if transmission of the orientation is biologically based. I thought this to be a reasonable and insightful line of enquiry. The video -which I assume you did not watch- looks at multiple avenues of research which, as a whole, identify a number of biological factors (as in DNA and in-utero environmental) that could influence an individual's orientation. I thought the explanation of exclusively homosexual rams to be especially revealing. The general gist at the end is that there is no single "gay gene" but there are numerous biology-based markers which may influence orientation or, in certain unidentified combinations, may even be determinative of orientation. And since there are degrees of "completeness" in those combinations, this may account for a range or scale of orientations. I thought exploring this line of research served your interests and objectives as stated in the original post [edited by me]: "I would like to ask how many members ultimately felt they CHOSE their sexual orientation as opposed to having it assigned? It's interesting to me that so many gays are in complete denial of the ability to choose. WHO ELSE CHOSE THEIR LIFESTYLE?" I agree the lifestyle is a choice, but the basis for that choice -the orientation- is a more complex question. A bird cannot choose to be a bird; it was born that way. But the choice of taking flight is only possible if it was born a bird in the first place, and that was not a choice but a gift of nature.

Gorgeous face! Look at those lips! (The rest ain't bad, either.)

A few years ago, I attended a presentation on Fermi's Paradox, a question posed by physicist Enrico Fermi that asked: considering the size of the universe and the likelihood of lifeforms other than human having developed elsewhere, why have we not encountered them or at least found evidence of their existence, past or present? I recently viewed a YouTube video entitled "Born This Way: The Science Behind Being Gay." Predictably, [spoiler alert] the final conclusion is that there are a lot of factors, and no one knows for sure. But the research was interesting to see. The connection in my mind to the Fermi Paradox is from the way the presenter first formed the question: if homosexual people have existed in every society and generation of humankind, but are, by-and-large, unlikely to reproduce, why are we still here? Wouldn't evolution have dispensed with an element that contributed virtually nothing to the human gene pool generation after generation? I found the postulated possibilities interesting.

As opposed to Professor Higgins' view that "The French don't care what they do actually as long as they pronounce it properly."

If I had a handyman like that, I'd be breaking sh*t all day.

Attractive man. And I like that his d**k comes with a timer to tell when the session's over.

Just the package I've been waiting for! But why the box?

I wouldn't know where to start but I assume it would include kneeling and begging.

Is he why some are called muscle cars? All he'd have to do is whisper "Lick me," and I'm on it.

Well, I certainly wouldn't be walking home.

Being older -and then some- I might qualify, or at least test his upper limit.😆 I could spend all day just looking at that smile. Gorgeous!

What in the world could that forth F be? Semantics. Sheesh.

10 minutes of interrogation by him and I'd confess to kidnapping the Lindberg baby. If it takes that long.

I'm going to the basement and breathe radon.

You express the issue through the lens of your experiences and that of others similarly situated, but seem unable to allow others to express their reality through the lens of their experiences. Sexual fluidity may be a species-based attribute, but individual preferences are, by their nature, an attribute of the individual. I know precisely the source of my dick sucking: I like it. I don't know why I like it, nor do I care. It is as it is. I am what I am, I know what I am, and I accept, welcome, and embrace it. And I am unambiguous in that. And I require no lecture in aberrant sexuality to explain or defend it.

I assume his trousers are double pleated.

A few weeks ago, I rewatched Solomon and Sheba (1959), starring Yul Bryner and Gina Lollobrigida, a typical and predictable Hollywood Bible story. There was one scene I had not remembered from my earlier viewings: a dance with a very suggestively costumed Gina, honoring her Sheban gods. I think my mouth opened a little in surprise that both the costume and Gina's gyrations actually made into a 1950s movie. Although I self-identify with the phrase "as three-dollar bill," even I said, "That was hot!" I was even more surprised to learn she was still alive at the time and living in Rome.

If he truly is, and judging by his videos, he's the most accommodating and flexible straight bottom boy I've ever seen.

Well, when you get down to it, if the man doesn't know which gender he's attracted to, his d**k will let him know. Some things just aren't that complicated.

I gave this a HaHa, but what we really need is a "groan" emoji.

As an aside to the dictionary angle, after Samuel Johnson had completed his first dictionary of the English language, a committee of the upright ladies of London society came to congratulate him for not including any of the "naughty" words in his dictionary. Johnson thanked them for their sentiments, then commended them for their stamina in looking them up.

A straight friend of mine once asked me when I first decided I was gay. I told him it was March 12, 1972, about 6:00 o'clock in the morning. I was in the bathroom shaving and watching myself in the mirror. I began to evaluate my life and where it was heading. Then I thought, "You know, I think that from this moment on, starting today, right now, I'm going to find men instead of women sexually attractive and compatible. Yeah, that sounds right. That's my new plan! Damn, glad I got that out of the way!" Then I looked at my friend in way that made him know I thought he'd asked a stupid question. It's not a decision, it's a discovery. It's not a choice, it's more like left to chance. As others have said, science doesn't have a fully developed and definitive explanation of the cause of homosexuality, nor of heterosexuality for that matter, other than it's the norm of the species. But just as there are dark-haired Swedes and blond Italians, individuals can sometimes differ from the norms. It's also not uniform, it's a scale. Some men are completely straight (at 0 on the scale) and others are exclusively gay (or as I call it, a perfect 10). The OP is bisexual, which does give him a range of choices. But I'm not bi, and certainly not straight, so my choices are more limited. The closet I've ever been to female genitalia was at birth, and I've never looked back. I like my women like I like my coffee. I don't like coffee. And if someone would ask me what I'd like in a woman, I'd say I like mine on the taller side, with broader shoulders and a bigger d**k. But that's just me. YMMV.

OMG! That's the biggest nipple clamp I've ever seen! I hope.