Walt

Straight or bi + visiting town + no travel schedule = potential scam. Visiting, eh? So how long are you in town? Oh! Just until everyone figures out your game! 😉

His profile doesn't mention kissing -- which is important to me. Can anybody report that he actually does kiss??? 😉

Indeed, I think I've heard that ADYNXX is prescribed to treat "bumps" and congestion due to allergic reactions. 😉

Well who died and made "the rest of the fitness and athletic communities" King? 😉 I also want to see their 2024 vote tallies for how they rated gay people in general, trans folk, and people with disabilities, before I begin to trust the judgement of ""the rest of the fitness and athletic communities." Always remember, don't look for the validation of the person next to you in the gym; there's a good chance they are an idiot.

I just went through them all. (Too much time on a Thursday evening.) Are you sure??? Of the new out of towners only about ten were anything out of the ordinary -- and 80% of those were 1.) "bisexual tops" 2.) without a departure date or future travels schedule and 3.) no reviews -- and those tend to be attractive only to clients who haven't learned to read between the lines. 😉

Are you sure? I think he may just be several years older and added a lot of muscle mass? What do others think?

So call me a Clintonian on this policy issue. 😉

But isn't the photograph of Gloria Upson (as portrayed by Joanna Barnes)? 😉

Heard he’s well-endowed. Them in this case the old saying "Big nose, big dick," would be "Big pecker, big pecker."

I don't think the powers that be read every single post. When I think something should be moved, I click on the three little dots on the upper right hand corner of any post in the stream and "Report" saying "I think maybe this should be moved to xyz." 100% success rate. 🙂

Particularly given that the only thing separating one from the other is BEE. 😉

You could also have hand signals, like the catcher and pitcher in baseball signalling what they want to do in the locker room after the game is over. Or wear different colored bandanas. Vive la discretion!

As Queen Gertrude says in Shakespeare's Hamlet: "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." I can't wait to see how many postings you make when you are really passionate about some topic.

Hmmmm....So your theory is that Carol Channing and Hollywood are British. Interesting. 😉

Diamonds have been a symbol for gold-diggers seeking sugar daddies for a good long time. 😉

Polls have shown a lot of people like that sort of person.

https://rent.men/GentlemannXL ???

Maybe maximizing daily rent men appointments wasn't the primary motivation in deciding where to live? I've heard it sometimes happens that people move somewhere because it is closer to family or friends, it is more convenient to their full-time job, or they find a good deal on purchase or rental cost. 😉

https://rent.men/LucasLeon ?????

You don't need to tag or name them! Just say they're not doing it, and we will all get the message. 🙄

Not to say that some people don't understand the meaning of words, but if you you say you're not doing something -- and then you do it, you have actually done what you've said you weren't going to do. It's true!

But it is very easy to play by the same rules! VERY easy. When a provider replies, great -- When a provider doesn't reply or blocks you, move on. Done, Now everyone is playing by the exact same rules. Another, but I think less potentially successful direction would indeed to focus on what is "unfair." There is so much that is unfair in this hobby. It would probably need to start with regulating this industry rather than outlawing it and codifying rules and behaviors and demanding financial transparency. To make it less "unfair" there could be financial subsidies for clients who couldn't afford the highest fees, transportation provided for clients who saw what they want in another geographic market, Diversity/Equity/Inclusion rules, advertising standards, standardized application forms for sessions, etc. -- all aimed to remove unfair practices.

Thinking of it is as an unwritten rule that you may not even understand or agree with is indeed a good way to think about it.

I absolutely agree tat it is legitimate -- but I also think blocking people when one knows additional back-and-forth/discussion/negotiation/Q&A is only going to be a time and psychic energy sink is perfectly legitimate. Providers have all sorts of baselines/business models/preconceived ideas. Although it is a bit abrupt, It is not their responsibility to explain all of that to a potential client when they can tell from the very first question that it is simply not a match.