CuriousByNature

What happened to Diana was tragic. She was an amazing person, but she was not a saint. The media portrayed her as victim, but she was more multidimensional than that. The marriage to Charles should not have happened, and the fallout from that decision had repurcussions for the whole family.

Any detatched house under a million dollars in Toronto or Vancouver would be an incredible find ?

In Proverbs. 'Pride goes before destruction and a haughty (arrogant) spirit before a fall' I think. My grandfather taught Sunday school, so we heard many a verse

Thank you I am happy she made a statement so quickly, and I think she nailed it.

Really? That's great I haven't seen it - do you have a link?

True enough, but she was a commoner and the daughter of an Earl - while she was no doubt in the top 1% of the social strata it was a far cry from being royal. The chasm between the Monarchy and the rest of the aristocracy is pretty vast, and I think both sides prefer it that way for the most part.

Bump...

Ad has disappeared?

Not so sure... I have met straight couples who look eerily similar. Particularly after being together a long time.

Yeah, I find it hard to believe that there was no inkling of what might be required. She's a smart cookie. But I also think marrying into the Firm would be overwhelming for anyone not raised to be 'royal'. The general acceptance of ennobled commoners marrying into the Royal Family is barely 100 years old, let alone people without any aristocratic background. Even Princess Margaret apparently held her own royal birth over her mother's head, who, though Queen Consort and the daughter of an Earl, was 'made' royal rather than 'born' royal. Ego upon ego upon ego.

This made me literally LOL... thanks! ?

I'm a bit upset with the American media for sensationalizing the interview and making statements about there being a large rift in the Royal Family. That is too general a characterization. Oprah did a fine job with her interview, and Meghan and Harry presented themselves well. The Monarchy will not likely comment on any allegations - they won't rally into some sort of defensive counter attack as the media would like. I would expect, at most, a simple statement from the Queen expressing sorrow that Harry and Megan felt it was necessary to move away but that they will always remain an important part of the family. Some of the interview was quite enlightening, and I do not doubt that some members of the extended family would make crass and racist comments about Meghan and Archie - just look at the history of comments made by Prince Philip and Princess Michael of Kent. But it is inacurate for the media to suggest that race was a factor in Archie not receiving titles and separate security. The Monarchy has been streamlining things for several decades in response to public criticism over the number of titled members. I dont think the Queen is under any obligation to confer titles to any great-grandchild, other than those in the most direct line of succession - William's kids. I don't believe that Princess Eugenie's child has received a royal title, nor the grandchildren of Princess Anne, who in fact refused titles for her own kids. I am also unhappy that the media makes references to the 'Royal Family' in general with respect to accusations rather than 'a member/certain members of' - this leads the public to believe that all members are in cahoots with one another and share discriminatory feelings about Meghan. I think this is an irresponsible and unfair characterization, and it only serves to sensationalize the situation. It is also misrepresenting Meghan's words. But those who harbour racist attitudes in the family should not have the advantage of hiding under the Queen's petticoats, or behind the image of the Royal Family as a unit. Poor Queen E. She must throw her hands up in the air trying to manage the turmoil she gets confronted with so often. But it seems she and Harry and Meghan will weather this - and it was great to hear the mutual respect they all share. Hoping this interview might raise awareness of mental health and wellness issues at the very least. ?

Mike Richards did an awesome job. I think Brad Rutter would as well. He has a quiet kindness like Alex, and no pretense from what I have seen on Jeopardy and The Chase. I hope he fills in for a while too.

I think he has a tattoo like that on his inner wrist... so, maybe?

I like oranges well enough, but I guess I'm just not THAT into them...hahaha.

Good thing they didn't do an MRI. That could have been messy.

Thank you - your post has just reminded me of one of my favourite Bushisms...lol. 'There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.' Oh George W, you cracked me up so often ?

The emphasis on 'party' is a bit concerning, no?

How would someone explain to an ER doctor how a citrus seed became lodged in a urethra?

No problem! Their neck tattoos will be hanging around their shoulders by then.

Some uber-rich may think they control night and day, since the Earth evidently revolves around them.

We are in that space right now of understandable excitement about getting vaccinated and the prospect of travel. But until destination countries have covid firmly under control, I'm not sure how relaxing or enjoyable a vacation would be. I feel ya for sure, but maybe it's best to hold off until things are more stable overall? Life is short, but waiting a bit longer could make the whole travel experience much more satisfying.

Sorry... not sure how to post a link to a thread, but there was recent discussion under the name Youseff.

https://rent.men/Markmasculine Same gentleman at the above link.

Not my cup of tea to be honest. But ultimately there must be individuals who have the means and interest to meet his donation amount... the age-old balance between available resources and priorities I suppose. ?‍♂️