SirBillybob

Sorry, don’t know why the quote function popped bold typeface then disappeared, but to the last paragraph points on warrant … The warrant idea speaks to government authority within the border control exceptionality that some find objectionable. However, there exists analytical tension between asserting the right to a warrant’s due process and the owner’s ability to frustrate that process. We cannot know his motives and he probably needed to think fast. If I wanted to take a stand on the procedure, volunteering as tribute so to speak, insisting on a warrant would possibly subvert my claim of a right to irreversibly destroy contents before a search could occur, on the spot using a wipe procedure before the contents could be hacked by authorities with a pin workaround. If I wanted control and to not bank on the action of detonating phone data post-warrant post-confiscation, as well as to challenge the statute, then I would live with the absence of a warrant. That said, I assume that pursuit of a warrant requires probable cause. Otherwise, to the extent that border control inspection is random even within the very small subset examined, thousands of phones with innocuous content would be confiscated upon refusal to unlock them without the warrant step. Similarly, given that a far greater number of locked suitcases are searched, that’s a lot of baggage piled up behind bars in the sobering up tank while waiting for court-executed warrants for owners refusing their contents’ examination.

If you thought you were confused before …

It could end up with the name Wilson.

At what particular point one’s legal duty to not obstruct inspection crystallizes is unclear: airspace, touchdown, the corridor hike to border control? The inspection process is imminent but there is not necessarily a bright line ruling other than broad border authority without the usual probable cause or warrant requirements. Apparently, border officers face-to-face are not required to articulate they are assuming specific legal authority over one particular aspect of your belongings at the point you are told to open your luggage or device. It’s baked into the mandate of overall inspection. So I suppose a prosecution may proceed based on duress wipe that occurred at any point along the way, depending on the circumstances, just as if one tossed an illegal substance into a rubbish bin en route to the staffed inspection area. Yet destruction is distinct from obstruction is distinct from contempt for a lawful order, so it’s easy to get into the weeds here. My advice: What would Rin Tin Tin on the leash think?

RM profiles come and go. That person can maintain contacts and preserve chats with continuity on WhatsApp. Moreover, the desire or need to change a cellular number can be accommodated while still preserving the contacts and content that one wishes to maintain, such as a roster of valued clients. You can also pin your current (at point of send), or live stationary or mobile location, to a contact that may be en route to meeting you. They can in turn patch that through to their navigation, or map theirs to you if delayed, lost, etc. They can send a voice message or ring you to speak briefly without logging in to RM and inviting a fender bender. Besides, surely two people mutually oriented to discretion should be able to arrange, via written format, a hook-up without it coming across to a third party observer as prostitutional trafficking.

The probability of twice is surprising depending on the denominator of entries. What is less surprising is being noncommittal because what could be gained by explaining any particular search trigger? Any relevant roadmap for gaming screening criteria is on travellers. See above.

One interesting additional component of the law related to the current adjudication of the duress wipe case is that it’s also a serious offence to tip off somebody under suspicion in such a way that they would erase or otherwise obstruct access to content that would be material to a criminal charge. Apart from cooperation in one’s own bargaining favour, that might explain Telegram User 1 not snubbing the FBI’s admonishment regarding sending an alert message via carrier pigeon across Manhattan to Telegram User 2 in a well known recent CSAM and sexual assault case.

#4 is actually a great option and not so labour-intensive. In Canada, only a very small proportion of travelers upon entry undergo electronic device searches. Yet roughly one-third to two-fifths of those searches reportedly result in criminal charges. Combined with similarly low device-search rates in the U.S., that suggests border agencies are generally relying on intelligence and articulable suspicion rather than conducting random fishing expeditions. To my way of thinking it’s easy to identify what material would be of interest to those searching, particularly related to activity that is criminalized, and similarly simple to organize it such that it’s not available for scrutiny. I might go as far as to suggest that some members here hoard content, one driver for that being its potential value in forum contribution. I certainly wouldn’t expect law enforcement to unquestionably assess some select images as legal, notwithstanding that we as a subpopulation share certainty about their legality.

Yeah, I saw it but went with the phone due to the topic. Around that era I’d have likely been detained for having photos of Peter Lupus in my wallet. Little does secondary inspection know that I currently store questionable content in my RayBans.

Right, mission impossible … no unambiguous material self-destruct intent whatsoever. ScreenRecording_08-01-2026 18-04-50_1.mov

The old saying applies: Show, don’t tell. I’ll chalk up your impulsively rendered recommendation as an established anchored tendency for dropping non sequiturs. Any writing coach not off their trolley would confirm that the opening sentence states the proposition, the middle sentence develops it, and the final sentence draws the conclusion. It follows basic paragraph architecture. They would be puzzled by, dismissive of, your desperate royal proclamation that my passage is a series of disconnected words as opposed to a cohesive unit. But while the posing of suggestions has been introduced, here you go … This isn’t your first rodeo along these lines. At some point you should be able to distinguish between staying in the saddle and lying in the dirt. —- Regardless of this fascinating side discussion, the important point for readers is that the placebo-controlled comparison occurred against a backdrop of ongoing standard lipid-lowering therapy, so the reported benefit reflects augmentation rather than substitution. Let’s stick to the topic.

He has been my favourite screen heartthrob for some time and I watched it opening day. I plead guilty to my crush, have lost my head anyway, and ask only to be carted off to the Galitzine. I have seen all of his filmography (TV and movies, some direct to streaming and obscure) and now M of U and the sheep movie are complementary on Prime Video. I just read The King’s Assassin along with revisiting Mary & George, so I could imagine him page to page. The similarity of his build, flawless skin, facial structure, and expressivity style to that of a guy of same approximate age I go with, but mostly Portuguese background more Med than northern, is uncanny. Though I still lean to my contact if a two-choice dilemma ever presented. ScreenRecording_07-21-2026 17-11-03_1.mov

You describe the arousal as reflexive and involuntary, even though it can resemble the type of response we usually associate with consensual, intentional erotic experiences. That similarity can understandably feel unsettling, but it doesn’t make it pathological or immoral. If the practitioner has experience initiating tripleP for a male patient with ED, for example, or on Emergency Room rotation has executed triage for priapism secondary to PDE5i uptake, robust erections will have already been witnessed in clinical practice. The observation itself is innocuous. Tumescence is an imperfect marker for true arousal and is not a strict prerequisite for the next stage in sexual response, orgasm.

I can neither identify a single word in my original post on clarifying Lipfendra’s role in management that would carry the risk of evidently triggering you, nor ascertain the choice of terms and language that someone of your apparent educational stature and self-reported breadth of reading would not have been able to comprehend. Your follow-up post (inserted) today continues to reinforce my view that your contributions are at times more vexatious than substantive. No harm in assessing your interpersonal filters for possible re-calibration at your next cholesterol screening.

Immeasurable courtship inflation these days. First world postmodern problem. A few Patagonia days based on face time recruitment stacked against sailing pen pals across vast ocean spans for permanent nuptials. 😏

The cautionary tale is now accompanied by an incident report that has added technical appendices to be pored over by an expanded creature oversight committee with bunker bases set up in Manhattan then Berlin.

Why do you need to view a more expansive smile or have him inadvertently recede his gums for enhanced scrutiny? Is it because the upper cuspids are crowded/ positioned labially high, and lower cuspids labially low, so the full chopper presentation is obscured? I take it that is the case based on your observations so far. The basis of his coming to your attention as a candidate is also unclear. A more random social platform or one in which physical characteristics explicitly figure as a substantial part of the hook. Those distinctions may be somewhat relevant in terms of risk of appearing shallow in your screening. I had my four premolars extracted, then fixed orthodontic therapy 2-3 years of braces followed by retainers in adolescence for that type of malocclusion. Orthodontic braces are ubiquitous in Brazil. You may be able to casually bring it up as it is a widespread goal within more lowkey normative aspects of “looksmaxxing” culture. If he satisfied all other upfront criteria (other than the indiscernible that others referenced as playing out over time) it probably wouldn’t bother me as I would mentally envision the potential correction, probably offer some ‘pro bono’ sponsorship for the expense. Perhaps match his own related goal-specific nut. If he is getting trip compensation, that might in fact be one of the incentives for his choice of labour. I believe the dental professional fees are considerably lower in Brazil.

Deep breath. Don’t fret about the bigger words. They weren’t intended to be a mystical incantation. Short version: People stayed on their existing treatment such as statins and one group took Lipfendra as well. The added benefit of Lipfendra was measured. Whether it fends off basic lip remains to be seen. Speak to your cardiologist; he or she may be able to explain the meaning of alternative in this context. For others with skin in the game I suggest reading Merck’s press release. I myself did not experience an adverse reaction to its detail and clarity.

Seems less criminal mastermind and more an awkward attempt to make new affectionate friends.

“Getting caught” would apply to a person providing massage in a jurisdiction where therapeutic qualification and practice are regulated yet putting oneself forward as possessing formal credentials that are the basis of certification, licensing, etc. It’s all in the wording of descriptive services. You need to find a labelling balance between “manual lymphatic drainage plus trigger point release” and “light repetitive stroking of skin with Boy Butter skin care brand”. In Canada it’s a patchwork system and inconsistently applied across provinces / territories. Ontario is an example of strict credentials and it’s usually framed as title protection in order to protect the professional integrity and recognize the complex academic and supervised practica steps that true practitioners undertake for licensing, with financial penalties for bogus representation. As such, a person there should explicitly specify the lack of formal licensure and not put the onus on clients to differentiate and grasp the exact professional wording. Think of the example where a trained registered nurse can take your temperature, BP &c, or administer an injection, where such procedures in certain cases can be executed by a non-nurse (or yourself) without credentials. Your family member or friend is subbing for a nurse in an area that falls within the nursing domain, but not masquerading as the relevant certified professional. Jail? IDK contingencies for failure to pay fines. I would worry more about running afoul of law in jurisdictions where both provision and receipt of commercial sex work is criminalized.

Now that’s a grape intervention one can let breathe and is spared the pitfalls of sub-adherence.

Actually the most common application will be augmentation not substitution, other than alternative to its injectable formulation or statins not tolerated. The research placebo groups continued their previous treatment, not solely the usual inactive agent that we think of as characterizing placebo. Therefore, the purported benefit of Lipfendra is additive to pre-existing standard of care, wasn’t head-to-head comparison with total withholding of LDL-targeted agents.

The rigour of gold-standard clinical trials exists not because cynicism is always justified, but because it is inevitable. The methodology is designed to withstand scrutiny regardless of where the skepticism originates. Many astute eyes, other than regulatory entities, critically appraise research findings. Next up: tracking of impact on major adverse cardiovascular events occurrence over longer periods.

He would have to have been especially unique in order to have smashed through a usually impenetrable glass ceiling of profound ejaculatory control. Stagger to the plain envelope. Then his short-term move following wrap. Then book follow-up.