SirBillybob

Yeah thanks for the earworm.

Ad link?

Yeah I’ve learned a lot of male stripper lessons in some 40 years of going to male strip clubs.

Here is one of several articles deconstructing and debunking the vaccine&cancer myth. You can always search the term “turbo cancer” as well. The few physicians making the claim of a link, and their followers, may have piggy-backed their fake claims on the possibility that cancer screening declined earlier in the pandemic and as a result the trend for patients, vaccinated or not, to be diagnosed at later cancer stages. Vaccines and cancer: The myth that won’t die PUBLICGOODNEWS.COM Over three years of research have found no link between COVID-19 vaccines and cancer. But the myth persists.

What difference does it make really? If respiratory track viral load is reduced due to lower disease severity as a result of vaccination, the array of behavioural factors that predict transmission may still override that one clinical factor of your lower live virus emission quantity into the next person’s system that may have lowered the possibility of transmission in the first place, assuming the sicker one is the more precautions taken to protect others. The lower the disease severity conferred by vaccination the greater the prospect of asymptomatic transmission if absence of symptoms reduced caution. The relevant question is: In the absence of any degree of alteration in CoV transmission potential what would support the decision to forego vaccination? Obviously nothing, because impact on disease severity is inarguable. The bigger question around transmission is: What is the vulnerability to more severe disease of the next person in my circle as a result of their illness severity immunity factors including that conferred by their vaccine uptake status? That explains the applicability and legitimacy of the social contract to do unto others. Fortunately, our own health benefits from the contract. If it were all left to altruism I’d hate to see the outcome. The least one concrete thing one can do is reduce one’s own infection viral burden through vaccination in case it makes a difference. That difference, if it exists at the level of transmission risk, is influenced by behavioural factors, some of which are in our control. In contrast, we cannot control the choices of others but that itself further supports our own vaccine consumption.

Romeo / Hunqz : Visa or Mastercard the only credit cards accepted, as of now anyway

I would have no problem with Rentmen leaving the scene. Hunqz through Romeo Plus works just fine and my last annual fee was 85 Euros. Mastercard, but I see no evidence that they refuse other major card carriers. Many European providers straddle both platforms, as I do as a client, and undertake the burden of cost of two systems simply due to there being these two major sites and FOMO on good matches on either side of the booking equation. Shows up as “Romeo” on statement.

The wet lease in jets always flies better even given the shorter session.

That degree of wisdom suggests 63 and, I might add, it tracks according to aforementioned dynamics.😈

Well, mirror, speak the fuck up. How much off?

What difference does it make how many are riled up? It’s been and will always be that way. You are not wrong, though. However, the live feed revenue exceeds the loss undertaken due to patron reticence about entering as a supporting character in a substandard quasi-porno. The practice also discourages quality dancers that might otherwise be comfortable performing erotically without the risk of Tante Marie-Helene tuning in. Campus disproportionately draws in that component of talent.

I checked card statements and no apparent exchange rate hit at my end. So the platform ratio for me remains at 70:30 for creator-credit to cost-to-tip. For example, my cost is $136 Canadian dollars for the creator to pocket $70 United States dollars. Rethinking my expectations for a brief thanks from creators, inconsistently acknowledged as we all know. LOL. As well as from OF: thanks for contributing to this winter’s Aruba yacht-inclusive corporate retreat fund.

The within-platform payment receipt, knowledge of platform proportional charge of 20% on the base tip amount, the 15% sales tax (in my case delineated as GST) in said receipt, and elementary school-level math. See aforementioned example. In my case I also incur a greater overall charge beyond my illustration as my credit card is not USD and I suppose I pay an exchange rate. Similarly, some of my tips have been sent to creators not dealing in USD currency. The charge to me is in USD and I have to wonder if such creators have their 70% chipped away by exchange rates at their end. I also stopped specifying the tip amount in options message to the creator. I may write simply enjoy a lunch on me. If I say I sent $100 and they see $68-70 in their account I have to wonder what they make of it.

Not a question but an observation that I assume others share. I hadn’t paid much attention to my credit card statements but had a sense that the Onlyfans platform skims off 20% on tips, same as subscriptions. My subscription count over the years has been moderate and rarely renewed after a month for any creator. At least 25% involve meeting in person before or following subscription. However, I just realized that I am charged about 15% “goods and service tax” on all transactions. Therefore the net yield for the creator is about 70% of the transaction cost to me. For the creator to net a tip of $100 I am paying an additional $44 for the transaction (combining platform fee and sales tax) in which a C-note lands in his pocket, meaning the ‘send tip’ amount is $144 if your target is a true $100 gratuity. Disincentivizing. This adds up, of course, and a service cost of $440 for the privilege of a tipping composite of $1,000 over time seems exorbitant. I realize of course that the loss is mutually carried.

Sometimes your hands are tied and there’s really no choice. Like when an update inquiry is made and the response consists of endless backdates.

The GirlScout-outfitted dude may accept all tickling cookies. You need to get the cookies on side, though.

Pleasant but peasant crowd because the connectivity between dancers and customers is basically zilch compared to, say, Montreal’s Le Village. Have bread? Want to loaf privately with a freshly bathed dude? It’s the stripper club equivalent of let them eat cake.

Maybe just reach out to the one advertiser spanning the past two years or so for tips on where to find what you want (I redacted the X-rated part for the sake of decency). Location looks promising, though I hope that the painting of daisies is not a reference to pushing them up. Even odds for being loved or not. And, yes, it’s real.

Receipts? Vaccination is intended to mimic coronavirus infection so that true coronavirus infection is less likely to culminate in greater morbidity, or worse, death. That getting CoV for a day sensation when it occurs is reflective of antibody production. Why do you think that Immunologists and Virologists are first in line for revised strain-specific formulation dosing?

I recently went out of country for 2024-25 vaccine dose rather than wait for Health Canada to remove their heads from their asses on rollout timing. I was able to access the Nuvaxovid formulation after all. Interestingly, no site or systemic reaction at all compared to having consistently crashed onto sick bed with fever and malaise for a day or two following mRNA and other protein subunit version doses over the past almost 4 years.

What difference does it make, really, when you are doing the correct thing? It goes beyond courtesy to fiduciary responsibility. Wishing to be in the dark about a problem cannot be deemed a valid preference because you yourself will have had no prerogative for any values-based alternative. You know how no can sometimes mean yes? Don’t wanna know consistently means the opposite, or should.

De volta para você.

Well now I feel more badly for your taste than bitter about your flimsy dig, and I don’t even have a clue about that agent.

Why complain, though? You got to proclaim what is appealing to you, not having read the room as I decorated it, as well as now establish your terms for what is and isn’t a silly ask. Grow up.

@BlackSheep, some of the aforementioned responses are missing a great deal of your subtext. Being in the driver’s seat as your own coach for a provider accommodating your limits is a well-meaning but reductionist idea. Above all, be aware that this board is not the sex trade equivalent of WebMD. Though it makes sense on the face of it, could yield minimal gain. An escort won’t necessarily possess the conceptual skill set to address the phobia and anxiety you describe, particularly as the shortlist of candidates will be restricted by the physical type that appeals to you. (Imagine if arachnophobia treatment success were to hinge on therapist appeal; all that would be required is that he or she not be The Fly … Peter Parker doesn’t count) Sure, he can be sensitive and respect boundaries. However, a systematic deconstruction of your anxiety by an expert will help to dictate the application of exposure and desensitization techniques that could more effectively bring forward growth and comfort with sex. You describe a unique blend of both homoerotic and pathogen exposure fear. The approach might be a blend of both planned and executed uncomfortable exposure and desensitization. The former in particular would probably not be initiated by you and, moreover, should not be left to the caprice of an escort whose capacity is the call to sexual pleasure, albeit well-intentioned, and his direct conformity to your limits. It all sounds left to interminable randomness in moving the needle. Rigidified limits and the hope for their softening are not always amenable to simple placement in a new context without the adjunct of trained processing by an expert. Similarly, an incorrect and underprocessed interaction could unintentionally bind physiological sexual stimulation to revulsion and set you back further. You essentially said it, after all, to your credit. Again, I don’t know your resource limits but it would be remiss to neglect a recommendation for type of approach even if it cannot be realistically accommodated. If it were to be one or the other, I’d lean to counseling over consummation. If you were to only repeatedly pay a restaurant to not feed you there would need to be an element of reality that supports that consumption model. Otherwise, really tired and really expensive in short order. That synergistic coaching element could be external or conjoined with the eatery but would give it sense and purpose in shifting consumption. Self-promotion need not be shameless to be self-serving. Who doesn’t do that to make the world turn? I haven’t acquired or delivered a service in my lifetime that wasn’t propped by PR. I don’t proclaim to have the answer. That’s OK because such proclamations are a dime a dozen. Take your pick.