Boink

Honorable mention to a new discovery (to me), Boris Sanchez on CNN...
 

Episodes is a very funny show, and Matt is great in it. Very much worth checking out. They decimate the behind-the-scenes world of sitcom production - so much so that I was surprised to see LeBlanc settle in to the routine sitcom he's in now on CBS.

Episodes is a very funny show, and Matt is great in it. Very much worth checking out. They decimate the behind-the-scenes world of sitcom production - so much so that I was surprised to see LeBlanc settle in to the routine sitcom he's in now on CBS.

Episodes is a very funny show, and Matt is great in it. Very much worth checking out. They decimate the behind-the-scenes world of sitcom production - so much so that I was surprised to see LeBlanc settle in to the routine sitcom he's in now on CBS.

ADMIN NOTE: Leave the politics in the politics forum

I never heard about Lucy not liking Katharine Hepburn. One of the bios said that Lucie Arnaz named her daughter after Hepburn out of admiration for her career. It was said that Richard Burton hated working with Lucy so much that he made a point of trashing her in his autobiography and the people in Lucy's orbit tried to prevent her from seeing or hearing about that book. It's funny when you think how, for all the many big name guest stars Lucy had in all of her series over the years, her character always fawned in tongue-tied adoration of any and all movie stars. The real life Lucy bowed to no one. In a way I admire that.

Honorable mention to a new discovery (to me), Boris Sanchez on CNN...
 

Hopefully he'll fuck the arrogance sitting in the White House.

I watched the third episode and didn't laugh once. The show feels so 'written' - every line is a zinger. Every line sounds Whitney Cummings-esque. And the acting is abysmal across the board, including John Goodman and the hallowed Laurie Metcalf. Now that I know they've brought back the annoying Estelle Parsons, I'm done.

Not an anchor, but a regular on all the shows, Josh Barro. Those blow job ears, man: YUM!
 

 
 
 
http://www.feelguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Barro22.jpg

FUCK. Dude is he hot.

Honorable mention to a new discovery (to me), Boris Sanchez on CNN...
 

Yes, I would say that the Head of H.R. at ABC News has excellent taste. Don't forget about Gio Benitez (pictured here with his husband):
 
http://greginhollywood.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Gio_Benitez_Tommy_DiDario-400x258.jpg

Was watching ABC News the other night when James Longman did a report from the Middle East. Discovered James is openly gay and is called "the Beirut Beefcake" by some. Thought he should be added to our "sexiest news anchors/reporters" list.
 

I've wanted these three for 20+ years...
 
http://malecelebbio.com/gallery/2012/02/Dan-Cortese-18.jpg http://hollywoodshow.com/star_images/michael-bergin-c.jpg

I like how they theorized how if anyone would be a trump voter it would be Jackie. In the original show, it always bugged me how they dumbed Jackie down over the years. That's even more glaring (and pathetic) twenty years later. In this re-boot, their take is that the dumb one is the non-trump voter. (The writers couldn't even throw Hillary a fictional vote - dumb old lovable Jackie got so flustered at the booth she voted for Jill Stein.) They offered no POV from Dan (or anyone else), either.

An excellent article, thoughtful in a way that Roseanne Barr (now a card-carrying Fake Newser) is not, thought-through in a way that the rebooted Roseanne Conner character is not.

I thought this article articulated pretty well my thoughts on what's wrong with the re-boot...
 
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a19635281/roseanne-reboot-2018-review/

I thought this article articulated pretty well my thoughts on what's wrong with the re-boot...
 
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a19635281/roseanne-reboot-2018-review/

I thought this article articulated pretty well my thoughts on what's wrong with the re-boot...
 
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/a19635281/roseanne-reboot-2018-review/

Thanks for the responses. I did set up a box at a facility with a 'physical' address'. Sometimes when I notify this or that company (such as American Express) with my change of address, I'll get a response that they have identified my new address as a postal service facility and that I must provide them with my physical address as well. This pisses me off because I want ZERO mail coming to my actual physical address ever again. (The post office and/or my apartment building screwed up my service one too many times.) I'm mostly worried that if I shut off delivery to my physical address altogether, I'll miss important mail from the DMV because that address is still on my driver's license. But if I DON't shut that service off altogether, my box will continue to be filled with flyers and junk mail until it's stuffed full.

Put them in a nicely gift wrapped box and ship them to the US Naval Observatory, Washington DC, attn: Michael R Pence.
Enclosed a handwritten note that says “Mike, I found these at our apartment in Indianapolis. Are they yours? Hugs and kisses, Blake. “