JayCeeKy

PLEASE treat him with care. He is very fragile (mentally), I tried to help him money-wise - but he is basically homeless. He got a hotel room nearby in ATL but still advertises. on RM.

Yes, he is a troubled young man. Likely suffering from mental illness.

Scared the shit out of me Showed up with two heavy red suitcases outside the hotel garage. Japanese descent. He was focused on me giving him money. He would not leave until I gave him cash. I worked with the mentally ill for many years - he appears to have a mental illness.

I met with SmoothAdonis last night in ATL and WOW! One of the sexiest bods I've ever encountered. Plus, super cool personality - friendly, intelligent, and NOT a clock watcher. And when it comes time for action, he' a tiger. An absolute "10." He wants a token deposit because he said he wasn't going to drive into Midtown from the suburbs and then be ghosted - but he did show, and on time. And yes, it's a true 9 incher. Atlanta has more than its share of super hot Black studs, but this one's at the top of my list. (Photo taken by yours truly.) https://rentmen.eu/SmoothAdonis

Anybody wearing a mask in his Profile. I've learned the hard way that anonymity is not the only reason some wear masks. Masks don't preclude a hire, but it makes me very cautious.

Interesting question, one that's actually crossed my mind in the past. I asked my friendly neighborhood ChatGPT the question: What do gay men consider "losing their virginity?" There isn't a single definition. Among gay men, just as among heterosexual people, "losing your virginity" is often a personal, cultural, or social concept rather than a medical one. Some common ways people define it are: First experience of anal sex (either as the insertive/"top" or receptive/"bottom" partner). This is probably the most common traditional definition among gay men. First mutually consensual sexual experience with another man, regardless of the specific act. Some people consider oral sex, mutual masturbation, or other intimate sexual activities to be the point at which they are no longer virgins. First emotionally meaningful sexual encounter. Some people don't count a casual hookup but do count their first sexual experience within a relationship. Not a useful concept at all. Many LGBTQ+ people reject the idea of virginity because it was historically defined around heterosexual vaginal intercourse. Instead, they simply talk about their "first sexual experience" or "first time having anal sex," "first time giving oral sex," and so on. Why there's no universal definition The traditional concept of virginity was built around penile-vaginal intercourse. That framework doesn't translate neatly to same-sex relationships, so many gay men define it in ways that reflect their own experiences rather than a cultural rule.

Several of our fellow members in our "Company" have privately followed up with me about Cam, expressing curiosity not only about his physical presence but also about what he brings to an experience. It is easy to understand the interest. Cam possesses a striking, hairless physique - smooth from head to toe - with proportions that evoke the idealized forms of Michelangelo's sculptures. At our first and, so far only, meeting, I gave him a skimpy gold thong to pose in, and the image of that moment has remained vividly with me ever since. I've only shared one session with him, so I can't claim to know the full extent of his repertoire. However, afterward he mentioned that our next meeting would involve a wrestling session, which certainly piqued my curiosity. Although Cam is on the shorter side, he defies expectations in more ways than one. His lips are, without exaggeration, among the most striking and attractive I have ever seen on a man. A final reflection: in writing this, I recognize that I may have reduced Cam too much to his physical appeal, and for that I apologize. While his appearance is undeniably extraordinary, it is only one aspect of who he is. Cam is an intelligent, thoughtful, and multifaceted young man whose beauty extends well beyond the merely physical.

https://rentmen.eu/FantasyCam I saw Cam a few days ago in Indy. He's very hot - has a super hot twink body. I had a great time with him and definitely will schedule again. He's in NYC for a few days. Highly recommend.

He was on my list of possibilities. Thanks for the heads-up. You refer to a "duo" and then used "they"- I am wondering if there is another escort involved? Did he require a prepayment and then abscond? Can you clarify WHO "they claimed to be?" Also, I've noticed that several Latin escorts describe themselves as "complacent." Curious about the meaning, I asked ChatGPT how the word should be understood in English. It explained that, in this context, the intended meaning is likely closer to pleasant, agreeable, and eager to please—all positive qualities in an escort. This differs from the English word complacent, which usually carries the negative sense of being overly self-satisfied or unconcerned.

Thanks to @ErikEriksson, @nomad et al. for their cogent remarks that clarify the issues and correct fabricated quotes. I made my original post to call attention to what I viewed as an openly hateful remark by a new provider who apparently believes that using the anti-gay slur beginning with "f" is acceptable. What never occurred to me was that some people here would ignore or minimize the provider's offensive language almost entirely and instead focus on my passing comment that his rates were beyond my budget and what I typically spend. I was even called a "jerk" simply because I had the audacity to suggest that I might be interested if there were room for negotiation at a lower price point. Apparently, even raising the possibility of negotiating a price is, to some, an unforgivable sin. Now I read a member's comment with the equally absurd claim that there is some sort of unwritten - but supposedly universally accepted - rule prohibiting discussion or negotiation of rates. If that's true, used car salesmen everywhere must be envious of an industry where asking whether a price is negotiable is treated as a moral failing. Gratefully, after being portrayed as a time-wasting, lowballing jerk, I received a private (and consoling) message from another member encouraging me to ignore the bullying and assuring me that I had done nothing wrong. I appreciate that sort of kindness and support, but it's difficult to ignore the fact that the conversation has been diverted away from what should have been the real issue: an openly derogatory slur directed at our still-targeted community. Instead of condemning that behavior, some have chosen to criticize an entirely innocuous comment about my budget. To me, that shift in priorities is far more troubling than anything I wrote.

It’s a bit surprising to me that gay men would direct more criticism at someone who merely suggested a lower rate in a business transaction — branding them a lowballing, time-wasting jerk who deserved to be blocked — while offering only minimal criticism toward a provider who casually uses a hateful slur with what seems like clear disdain for the gay community.

At the risk of belaboring an already moribund horse, it remains unclear to me whether you actually read my previous comment explaining why I did not simply respond with “Thanks, but no thanks,” so I will restate the point more plainly. My principal objective was to make it clear to someone who appears to be significantly overvaluing his services that he may, in fact, be pricing himself out of the market entirely. Constructive feedback of that nature can be valuable, particularly when an individual seems disconnected from what the market is realistically prepared to bear. And yes, perhaps there was an element of "bargaining" on my part -- but negotiation and price discovery are hardly foreign concepts in business, nor do they constitute bad faith or improper conduct. More broadly, I find it rather absurd to suggest that people should block one another on Rentmen simply because they fail to agree on price. If everyone adopted that approach, the platform itself would quickly become dysfunctional, reduced to little more than users reflexively blocking one another over routine disagreements about value. A far more rational response from the provider would be to simply ignore an inquiry that does not meet his expectations or, better yet, recognize market realities and offer a compromise rate -- particularly if business happens to be slow. What is neither appropriate nor prudent, however, is responding with language widely understood to be derogatory, particularly when those words are inherently offensive to the very audience one purports to serve. But then again, perhaps I simply operate under a different understanding of how rational adults -- and competent professionals -- conduct business.

I appreciate the feedback regarding my brief exchange with this provider, but I would point out that simply replying with “Thanks… but I’ll pass for now” offers him no meaningful feedback as to why I chose not to hire him. I mentioned the $300 figure because that is, in fact, generally what I offer for this type of service. Constructive feedback is especially important for someone like this gentleman, who I suspect may be relatively new to the business (both of his reviews are less than two months old) and may have unrealistic expectations about what most clients -- at least in my experience — are actually willing to pay for the requested service, which typically is not in the $600–700+ range he appears to expect. That said, the pricing issue is secondary. The primary reason I chose to share information about this particular provider was to alert our “company of men” to what appears to be his clear disdain for gay men, as evidenced by his repeated use (twice) of a term I consider highly demeaning -- made all the more concerning given the context in which he chose to use it in responding to me.

https://rentmen.eu/YngMotionXTrey I probably should have said his $600-$700 fee was way over MY budget, but still, I wasn't expecting this kind of response. He also Blocked me.

I have become very reliant on ChatGPT to give me reliable answers on various topics ranging from stereo speakers to discerning the best times to travel to various locales (cost-wise, weather-wise, etc). So, it got me to wondering whether "AI"could help in my never-ending pursuit of the hottest (and "best" -- because IMHO the "hottest" are usually not the "best") gay escorts. I did a cursory search of this site on the topic with no results. So, just for fun, here's what AI says about finding the top male escorts (and, spoiler alert: no big surprises - but maybe it will spark some discussion): Who are considered to be the top male escorts in the United States? There isn’t a universally accepted “top male escorts” list in the U.S. because the industry is largely private, decentralized, and often operates through agencies, personal branding, or invitation-only referrals rather than mainstream rankings. That said, a few names and platforms are widely recognized in media coverage, luxury-companion circles, LGBTQ nightlife, and online escort directories for reputation, visibility, or exclusivity: RentMen — One of the best-known male companion directories in the U.S., especially in gay and bisexual markets. Rentboy (historical) — Before it shut down after a federal case in 2015, it was arguably the most famous male escort platform in America. Companion listings on Slixa — Commonly cited in discussions of upscale independent escorts. ManServants — More entertainment-oriented (events, parties, “boy toy” experiences) rather than traditional escorting. In terms of individual escorts, the people most often regarded as “top tier” tend to be: -- high-end independents in cities like New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Las Vegas, and Chicago -- escorts with celebrity clientele or influencer-level social media followings -- men specializing in luxury companionship/travel rather than explicit sexual services -- well-reviewed companions on vetted platforms Among affluent clients, qualities that usually define “top” include: -- discretion and professionalism -- physical fitness/grooming -- conversational ability and social polish -- reliability and screening practices -- ability to travel internationally A lot of the most sought-after male companions are intentionally low-profile and operate by referral only, so they don’t publicly market themselves at all. If you want, I can also break this down by: -- luxury/high-end companions -- escorts popular with women -- gay male escorts --- celebrity-famous escorts -- safest/vetted platforms -- major-city scenes (NYC, Miami, LA, Vegas, etc.) -- legal considerations in the U.S. Who are the top gay male escorts? There’s no official ranking system for “top gay male escorts” in the U.S., and many high-end companions deliberately stay anonymous for privacy and safety reasons. Publicly known names usually come from reality TV, adult entertainment, luxury-companion marketing, or escort-award circuits. A few of the most recognizable names associated with the U.S. gay escort scene over the years include: Rocco Steele — One of the best-known luxury escort figures to cross into mainstream gay adult fame. He openly discussed using Rentboy and won escort-industry awards. Jimmy Clabots — Became widely known through the Showtime series Gigolos, which followed male escorts in Las Vegas. Michael Lucas — More famous as a producer and entrepreneur than an escort specifically, but long associated with elite gay nightlife and luxury companion culture. Max Konnor — Better known today as an award-winning performer and creator, though often discussed in high-end gay companion circles online. The most sought-after gay male escorts in major U.S. cities today are usually: -- independent rather than agency-based -- referral-only -- active on platforms like RentMen or invitation networks -- branding themselves as “companions,” “travel partners,” or “luxury hosts” Cities most associated with high-end gay escort markets: -- New York City -- Los Angeles -- Miami -- Las Vegas -- Chicago If you want, I can also give you: -- the most famous escort websites/platforms -- “luxury companion” agencies -- top cities for the gay escort scene -- differences between independent escorts vs agencies -- safety/red-flag advice -- famous escorts from TV/porn/social media specifically.