Rocky93

I was there the weekend before. Friday and Saturday were both so crowded I only stayed about an hour. Most of that was spent just trying to move through the crowd to find a place to stand without being in someone else's way. I didn't enjoy it at all. Went back Sunday night & it was less crowded, although fewer dancers too. Like RadioRob, I enjoy the stage show, but for me, the claustrophobia that builds isn't worth it.

I enjoy going to Johnson's, but when I do...  it's more for the stage show than what happens off stage.  
You get to enjoy the guys on stage and the ones that look good to you...  a dollar or two lets you get up close.  Rub the chest a little bit and maybe a peek at the goods as you stuff a bill into the underwear.  
For those that you reaaaaally like...  it might involve a private dance.  But outside of that, as you mentioned they don't really know how to work a room.  In many cases, it's too busy to work it.  In others, they just hide away until it's their time to be called up again.  

I went to Johnson's twice last week: once on a crowded Saturday and once on a less crowded Tuesday.
Saturday was too crowded to be enjoyable for me.  Long waits for drinks, and not enough room for dancers to circulate through the crowd between sets.  They could easily raise the cover charge on Saturdays to thin out the crowd.  There may have been 200 men and 4 women in the audience, but the 4 women got most of the attention from the dancers, which are mostly straight.
Tuesday crowds were more my style, but it still didn't seem as much fun as in the past.  The club looks great, but the dancers appeared uninterested and were constantly going to the bar to count their tips and exchange bills in front of the customers.
It's still a great club and I'm glad it's there for us to enjoy, but the dancers need a little coaching on how to work the room when not in stage.  I'll be back next year

Still trying to set up a meeting in person and I think because he's so new he may be nervous about in person meetups for worship 
I don't hire for penetration sex or anything hardcore so I think that I am considered pretty vanilla so I hope that maybe I can convince him to meet with me in AC 
I don't do Skype or webcam shows prefer live muscle sessions where I can certainly feel and touch the muscles 

Please don't listen to AOC!  Climate change doesn't happen like that!!!

Please don't listen to AOC!  Climate change doesn't happen like that!!!

I hardly ever identify as gay anymore.   Of course San Francisco is a special case, but it hardly seems necessary to talk about sexual orientation.  When it comes up, I just say that I'm into guys. "Gay" this and "Gay" that are artifacts of people who are attracted to their own sex being marginalized and oppressed.    And of course plenty of that remains, but I'm able to imagine a society in which sexual orientation just isn't an issue. When it isn't an issue, people won't feel driven to live in gayborhoods and to go to gay bars and to go to gay churches, etc.  Believe me, I  will  miss my outlaw status as a gay man, but being an ordinary person who happens to go for men is pretty comfortable.
 
 

Can we go back to the original topic and ask what it means to be "gay"? It seems to me that there are three aspects to the label: (1) psychological--being sexually attracted almost exclusively to members of the same sex; (2) behavioral--engaging in sexual activity almost exclusively with members of the same sex; and (3) social--identifying with other men who match (1) and (2). (IMHO, there is also a fourth aspect, which is actually enjoying being in the three categories.)
Under those circumstances, I don't see how it would be possible to answer "yes" to the question in the title of this thread, which is really a joke about statistical analysis.

In 80 years, a smaller portion of the Earth will be habitable for human beings, and the size of the human population will undoubtedly decline to reflect that reality, but the Earth will still exist, and so will Homo sapiens, even if civilization looks somewhat different from what we are accustomed to now.

Do people really think that Earth will still exist and be habitable to humans in 80 more years?  Unless we can develop domes to live under I doubt humans will still exist by the turn of the century.