Quincy_7

My way of asking that question is to ask the escort whether they're open to bareback. If they say yes, I don't pursue.

Besides Planet Romeo, what other sites do guys in those cities advertise on? RM listings for those cities are anemic.

I'm planning a short holiday at the end of April. I'd like to go to Europe. I'm looking for a city with a decent number of good looking escorts. My type is the defined smooth white twink (24 yo max).

Prague

I'm planning a short holiday at the end of April. I'd like to go to Europe. I'm looking for a city with a decent number of good looking escorts. My type is the defined smooth white twink (24 yo max).

Traveling to a particular city to meet escorts seems like a normal practice to me. At the peak of my “hiring career”, I frequently traveled to London or Amsterdam for sex-binges, where I met many guys on a weekend. I mostly hired what I called my “anchor escort” (is there a copyright to the term?) for the entire weekend, and had many threesomes with him and other boys. That was great fun. Now that I am older I do it less frequently, but still do it.

It's a safe bet that any instagram model who posts nudes on onlyfans will escort for the right amount.

What bothers some doesn’t bother others in the least. The extensive menus on offer provide for each diner’s choice of dessert.

What’s your point? Clients are routinely older than the guys they date.

In a good blow job all the work should be done with the mouth. No hands - thats cheating. One of the most satisfying things for me is when I can make a man cum this way.

The giver needs to keep his eyes open and look up at the receiver!

https://www.poz.com/article/prep-fails-gay-man-adhering-daily-truvada-contracts-drugresistant-hiv
 
http://instinctmagazine.com/post/canadian-prep-user-contracts-strain-prep-resistant-hiv
 
Combining PrEP with condoms is the safest way to go. STI's aside, there've also been a few times an escort wasn't exactly clean and sparking down there, if you know what I mean, and I was glad I had a condom on.

As I mentioned in my initial post in this thread, I ask escorts whether they engage in bareback sex with clients. This is a standard question to ask, especially if you're a prospective client interested in bareback. I never said anything about asking for their HIV status.

What is this "invade privacy" bs? Invading an escort's privacy would be something like trying to find out his real name, where he went to high school, and where his parents live. An escort is a sex worker. Seeking to understand a sex worker's sex practices is NOT an invasion of privacy. Note: I didn't say "ask if he is HIV positive." I agree that an answer to that question is of limited value. I said one should ask if he insists on the use of a condom when getting fucked. Can someone explain to me why such a question is an invasion of privacy? If you are an escort and don't like that question, you are in the wrong line of work.

I use condoms nonetheless. Asking that question simply helps me to narrow the field by removing riskier candidates from my list.
 

 
See above.

You can't assume an escort to be on PrEP. Furthermore, even if they are, there have been incidents of people contracting PrEP resistant strains of HIV.

You can't assume an escort to be on PrEP. Furthermore, even if they are, there have been incidents of people contracting PrEP resistant strains of HIV.

"Hmmm, I'd love to "convert" that Ass"......
 
http://instinctmagazine.com/sites/instinctmagazine.com/files/images/blog_posts/Devin%20Randall/2018/02/08/Mike%20Pence-Adam%20Rippon.png

It's not such a tough concept. there are two parts to understand:
1. Imagine two people - one says he barebacks as a bottom all the time, the other says he will only get fucked with a condom. Which one is more likely to have an STI? While you do not know for a fact that bachelor #2 is "clean," there are better odds that he is because he is already demonstrating cautious behavior. One can infer....
2. there is no such thing as "riskless" sex unless you literally do not allow skin-to-skin or lip-to-lip contact. So you must assess the field and calculate the risk that YOU are willing to take - you SHOULD care if your partner is someone willing to take risks - that is part of the calculation.
 
That's all that Quincy is saying, and it makes perfect sense. No judgment. I personally take some calculated risks (as a rimming enthusiast, for example), and have on occasion paid the price (thank God for antibiotics). But I assess my potential partner's judgment and behavior as best as I can and act accordingly.

I'm not trying to proselytize. What you do is your own business. I'm just explaining why I don't bareback, since latbear4blk made that comment.

https://www.poz.com/article/prep-fails-gay-man-adhering-daily-truvada-contracts-drugresistant-hiv
 
http://instinctmagazine.com/post/canadian-prep-user-contracts-strain-prep-resistant-hiv
 
Combining PrEP with condoms is the safest way to go. STI's aside, there've also been a few times an escort wasn't exactly clean and sparking down there, if you know what I mean, and I was glad I had a condom on.

https://www.poz.com/article/prep-fails-gay-man-adhering-daily-truvada-contracts-drugresistant-hiv
 
http://instinctmagazine.com/post/canadian-prep-user-contracts-strain-prep-resistant-hiv
 
Combining PrEP with condoms is the safest way to go. STI's aside, there've also been a few times an escort wasn't exactly clean and sparking down there, if you know what I mean, and I was glad I had a condom on.

You can't assume an escort to be on PrEP. Furthermore, even if they are, there have been incidents of people contracting PrEP resistant strains of HIV.

I think the point of asking that question is not to have the expectation of a completely "clean" partner based on the answer; rather, it's to narrow the field: logic suggests that one who is open to barebacking is more at risk for a plethora of infections. By avoiding those who are open and enthusiastic barebackers and staying only with those who insist on condoms, one is improving the odds of an "STI-free" encounter. Note, I said "improving the odds" not "guaranteeing."
 
To use a different example: many people drink and drive, and you can never be certain who is sober and who isn't. But given the choice, do you go with the driver who says "sure, I tie one on every day" or the one who says they don't drink? Neither is a guarantee, but I get the logic of going with the latter.

My way of asking that question is to ask the escort whether they're open to bareback. If they say yes, I don't pursue.