pubic_assistance

Only if you fail to post an ass Pic 📸 😉

I agree. Trans issues are completely separate and only serve to drag down the growth of gay (+bi) rights and public perceptions.

No. I think there was some additional information shared by others here who made a more reasonable argument as to why Baldwin should be held accountable for poor choices that may or may not have lead to the incident. As far as your excessive vitriol toward Baldwin...were you two dating long or was it just a weekend fling that broke your heart ?

Thanks. An insightful and realistic response.

OK. A reasonable response. I accept that is true. But again...MY comment was referring to the multiple article of athletes coming out who reside in the US. Every article ends with the statement that his / (her) family, friends and teammates were supportive. I have yet to read an article where an athlete came out (in the USA) and they were disowned by their parents and stoned-to-death by their local community.

I am starting to wonder whether @augustus planted that live ammunition. He's SO hell-bent on a conviction and angry at the judge for interfering.

I'm an architect. Our education is based heavily on visual critique ..so yeah. I am going to be acutely aware of someone's appearance.

This one has been discussed here previously. Adding the 'Q' has definitely impacted the LGBT community negatively.

Did Alec Baldwin reject your advances @augustus ? You DO seem to have an axe to grind.

Fair enough. I always liked Baldwin's work. Was great as Jack Dennehey(sp?)in 30 Rock. He also hosts for the classical music station in NYC. Talented performer. Great voice. But some messy life choices unfortunately.

Yes and no. I am an architect and I do full production of my projects. If I hire a plumber who fucks up and floods a house then HE is responsible for the subsequent lawsuit, not me. Just becasue I am the producer of the project it doesnt mean I am individually responsible for damages. I may be implicated because of my role, but I can't be held liable when someone else was the person hired to do the job. Baldwin may have hired the wrong person but he did have someone in that role. So the responsibility is theirs to check for live ammunition, not his.

Damn. He used to be in NYC but was taking a break. I wonder if LA is a move or just a visit. Never got a chance to meet him before he looks his time away from the business. Definitley a cutie

Based on a few old photos, he used to be pretty fuckable. I suppose retirement for an escort only comes when you run out of men who have a fetish for sad/old/pathetic men with bleached blond hair and a strange fashion sense.

Because it is. The weapons master is responsible for what's inside a prop gun, not the producer.

His profile looks like pretty straightforward therapeutic marketing. Maybe don't go to the shoe store for your groceries. Or.. Accept that you got a nice massage and ASK HIM about other services for your next session. I find that with many providers a good tip is a gateway to finding their true limits on sensual/erotic techniques.

Nice body. Pity that so many people always focus on dick size when a man has other attractive qualities to offer.

Wow. You aren't kidding. Shaving is normally about saying you're 39 instead of 43 This guy is clearly in his 80s. So chopping 30 years off your age is a high degree of misrepresentation.

That's like saying I couldn't find and sand at the beach 🤣

Again: you don't jail people for being entitled blow-hards. Your distaste for Baldwin is clearly infecting your ability to think justly. Fortunately the court made the decision and you weren't on the jury.

There were always word-of-mouth agents who introduced models to discreet wealthy gentlemen. I am sure Hollywood works the same way.

Well ...the defense is basically that there are some irregularities. You don't jail people because you don't like them. He should be exonerated because these were PROPS. Same way we assumed our toy guns didn't have real bullets in them when we played cowboys and Indians as kid.

The law is pretty clear on tampering with evidence. Did O.J. get off on "privelege" or was there clear signs of evidence tampering ?

To be clear: I was referring to domestic perspectives on homosexuality, since the fellow is American. Internationally you're definitely looking at a huge variety of viewpoints and laws.