jeezifonly

I'm in the minority here, but the eye-candy appeal for the kind of massage service I expect is not a consideration. If I'm paying for erotic massage or massage/play combo when offered, then yes. Therapeutic-sensual, my eyes are closed. I think, as attractive as Omar appears, I'd pass.

Cheers!

Demand comes first in pricing. I think the lower rates align with entry-level. Newbies with few reviews and minimal available vid content must ask less $$ because their market wants proof before hiring at peak rate. Once several clients book a second/third appt and word gets out, beginners rates will climb. Hiring is something that takes a hit in a downturn economy. Fixed incomers will be hit by higher expenses, and the luxuries of self-care get put aside for a windfall.

Yes. If the provider travels mostly without a permanent home base, just add "Traveler" in front of the name rather than a city locale after. For clients who never host, this detail of location is crucial for consideration. The ad sites allow the provider great leeway as to where they actually are vs words in the profile, and clarification here really makes a diff.

Kitchen gizmos come and go. As a better than average cook, some are not for me, others earn a place in the already full drawer. The nylon "ground beef masher" is one I avoided for years - but, dishwasher safe and works like a charm. Wood padels and spoons? still got'em, don't use 'em with raw meat anymore. Change is a part of the learning curve that makes cooking fun.

90m when provider is known, or recommended here. 60m first time if I'm unsure of skills, or want to test for chemistry before hiring him for full service when both are offered.

I can't imagine how a food product that has a specific need for frozen transport/storage (and documentation thereof) is a good fit for bootleggers. Reputable commercial food serving ops are unlikely to take the risk with unknown sources and chain of custody. I'd avoid limitless seafood buffets for the next couple months... When properly cooked, I love lobster, but crab more. I'm still avoiding radioactive shrimp. 🍤

Oh no! Jarrod wounded - again?

Fact: both client and provider had/have any number of past, present, and/or future sex partners. If the performance of the BFE is specifically what you're hiring, the performer fails at his job when talking about other partners, or spends time checking his phone. If you want the BFE, discuss your parameters for what happens in that context. And never forget the Fact.

To eliminate treatable physiological issues, consult your doc. You don't mention your age, but I presume you feel that lowered interest is happening too soon. Prescribed meds, blood sugar, cardiovascular issues, weight, low T, or other chemical imbalances can all contribute. Once you know that none of those are at issue, then turn to the laymen. Effort–benefit ratio is a personal evaluation, and maybe a small tweak to your routine of diet, supplements, hydration, meds, or activity can help. But first, rule out that this shift of interest might be a sign of other issues going on in your system apart from age.

If chemistry, appearance, and all other aspects of attraction and interaction work, but you know that the time spent with a provider must include you being penetrated, bring a toy and have him use it on you in whatever positions you like for intercourse after all the other interactive pleasures get explored and you gotta have it. Otherwise, there's plenty of other hard fish in the sea.

Search the provider's name in the Deli here. You’re liable to find a sentence or two not written by the provider himself. By nature, the experience is unique to each client (chemistry!) and reviews reflect chemistry and absence of it - very subjective- so you may find yourself a real gem who has no reviews at all!

The Academy Awards are solely for product marketing purposes, not indicating excellence of craft. DVD's used to be sent, possibly never watched. Now that every possible MPAA voter can be tracked for what they watched (scanned codes at screenings and entered codes on home viewing app) it's possible to sort exactly who's voting for what, but not why. Contracts between producers and the actors/creatives include very specific terms on additional post-release income adjustments (bonuses) for a)nomination and b)winning - all before a single frame is shot. Actors, directors, etc. campaign to voting members (some at their own cost) for "consideration" in the hope it adds to their payday - from both the nominated project and future offers. And the producers always benefit from the "Academy Award Nominated / / Winning" label thereafter. We watch because we're told it's a guide to what's good. When awards and truly excellent work overlap, it's mostly coincidence, and popularity of the nominee within the eligible voters for each category. Reality: It's mostly about the red carpet dresses on TV.

Even the Available Now light on the profile can be misleading about a provider's true receptiveness to a late-night first-timer in a town known for boozy/impulsive tourists. Plan ahead and book your witching-hour rendezvous in the afternoon, maybe?

The ensemble's Ave Maria by Franz Biebl is one of my Christmas must-listens - I hope they included it in the program!