coriolis888

Great response!

I'd change that to "most" guys. All is pretty harsh and likely incorrect.

That is so very true. Unfortunately, some providers cannot tell the difference between the two. Many providers feel that they should not have to answer questions prior to the hire. They feel their ad and photos should be sufficient data for a client to make an immediate decision to hire. Let us not forget, MANY ads are fake and contain exaggerated/false information and stolen photos. Over the years, how many threads in this forum were started by forum members asking about ads that appeared to be fake and were later proven to be fake? Countless ads were discovered as fake simply because other forum members asked the question and various other forum members responded with proof. In view of the above facts, some chat by a client is an attempt to make less, the chance of being scammed with a fake and false ad. Of course, there are true "time-wasters" but too many legitimate clients are falsely branded as wasting the time of an escort. As an analogy, if I went to a store to purchase a product and if I asked the sales agent questions about the product before I made the commitment to buy, would the sales person tell me to read the advertisement about the product and call me a "time waster"?

Exactly, that is the psychological basis (of a NDA agreement) some clients think will protect them from being outed. Not enforceable - period. The other issues you mentioned are generally not included in the countless NDA agreements some high profile clients have escorts sign when they engage them for sex. Facts equal prostitution which makes the agreement unenforceable.

Sorry, you missed the point. The NDA is, in itself, unenforceable because the purpose of the NDA is to conceal and protect the fact that prostitution occurred. That makes the agreement invalid.

Sorry, regardless of how "well written" the contract is, it would be easy to confirm or verify the intent of the escort and likely find graphic rentmen advertisements or similar type advertisements (including erect penis shots) or other proof of the escort's activities. The escort could admit to the court that he is an escort and show proof of ads and other documents confirming his activities. The NDA agreement would then be discarded by the court. The fact that the paid meeting includes prostitution, given the background of the escort, even though that word is omitted from the contract, the contract is unenforceable.

Speaking of Non disclosure agreements, two years ago, there was quite of lot of chatter in the news about outing Lindsey Graham for his being gay while the senator repeatedly called for laws that hurt the gay community. He also, supposedly, was mean to many "escorts" he hired or ghosted from rentmen. Speaking of non disclosure agreement and Senator Lindsey Graham - - - - - He has never married and has lived with the same male "roommate" for decades. According to various news reports, he has used "non disclose agreements" with most of the escorts he hired from rentmen. In the end, it seems not to matter to his constituents that such a hateful gay homophobe continues to be reelected by those who keep him in office. He is on his third term as senator for South Carolina. Check out this two-year old news article that discusses escorts from rentment possibly getting together to embarrass the hypocritical senator. https://www.fitsnews.com/2020/06/05/is-lindsey-graham-about-to-have-a-problem/

Then you are talking about a different thing - - The original agreement (None Disclosure Agreement) was an illegal agreement because the agreement involved an illegal act. If the escort decided to do a "tell all" book, for example, the contract (the NDA) cannot be used as restraining against the escort. The client could sue in civil court but that would defeat the purpose of non disclosure and privacy. If the escort demands money from the client for not doing a "tell-all" disclosure, that demand becomes extortion which is a criminal act by the escort. Different set of facts. Again, the original discussion of a non disclosure agreement is meaningless regardless of whether the escort or client pretends that the meeting took place only for non sexual reasons. In most states in the U.S., prostitution is illegal, plain and simple. Just bring up a copy of the escorts rentmen ad (or other ads) which will end the untruthful argument that the meeting of the client and escort was not for sex.

Signing such a meaningless document sometimes gives psychological comfort to the main party involved. As I previously wrote, the document is unenforceable because of the nature of the unlawful non-disclosure subject matter (prostitution). If you could find an attorney (unlikely) to take the matter to court for breach of the meaningless agreement, the court would reject the action and the person supposedly being protected would be "outed" because of having hired a prostitute, which is illegal. Nothing legal is accomplished for those people who have an "escort" sign such an agreement. Any attempt to enforce the useless "agreement" would cause the public to know what happened between the "escort" and the person who sadly thinks such an agreement is protection. Our laws against most prostitution in this country are unrealistic.

There is a big misunderstanding in connection with non-disclosure agreements. As with all contracts, a non disclosure contract cannot be enforced if the activities of the contract are illegal activities. In our goofy, mixed up country, prostitution is illegal in most states. Call it what you may, but do not forget what William Shakespeare said many years ago, "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

Do you mean - Lady "G" - ? Several escorts from rentmen.eu got together with an attorney last year and threatened to out that senator because of the mean way he treated them. Nothing ever came of the matter.

They don't?

Using your screen name, I will say he may have failed to tell you about such a sensitive or embarrassing thing - - - because he is "bashful".

The couple of exercises he shows are fairly easy. They do a lot of benefit to gaining solid abs. Even while watching television, those exercise are quick and easy to do. Of course, the gym is the place to do heavier exercises that benefit the exercises shown here.

Here is another website for Brazil. There are more than one hundred guys advertising on this site. https://www.vivalocal.com/acompanhantes-gays/moema/leonardo-20-cm---dispon-vel-24-hs--/272587464 I gave the link for Sao Paulo. You can change the location by going to the top of the screen and entering - acompanhantes masculinos then selecting the Brazilian city. Most have their price listed. The guys will either come to you but most want you to go to them. If you have them come to you, most will ask for Uber both ways. Good luck

https://www.webmd.com/sex/prostate-orgasm-what-it-is

Very pragmatic and realistic, regardless that it is true.

No one mentioned that he speaks several languages. The mysterious "Steven" I hope you are doing well.

But, as others have observed, the "only fans" clients eventually get bored by watching the same person time and time again doing the same thing, time and time again. Variety is the spice of life, or so I have been told many times.

Oscar had it right when he said - "To love oneself is the beginning of a life-long romance."

Comparing U.S. "laws" against prostitution, check out Brazil's open and numerous ads for female and male prostitutes advertising right along with ads for various household goods and other products. No prudes or hypocrites in Brazil. What a joke our country turned out to be with respect to prostitution. As an example of how liberal Brazil is compared to the U.S., the below link is just one of many links openly advertising prostitutes in Brazil: https://search.vivalocal.com/acompanhantes-gays/br?lb=new&search=1&start_field=1&select-this=248&searchGeoId=138&offer_type=offer&end_field=

My computer is back to the black screen with white writing. I see above where instructions say "If you want to switch back to the default theme, click the “theme” button down below and change it." However, there is no "theme" button on the screen I see. Does anyone know how to revert the screen back the way it was to white with black writing? Thanks in advance

Not always. When the economy is tanking, flexibility takes over. Sometimes, as Plato once said, "Necessity is the mother of invention."

Some providers think it is okay if they cancel or no-show. However, if a client does that, hell for the client. As mscleLovr said in reference to no show clients, it’s just an aspect of the business.

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection released an article last month advising about the new process of entering the U.S. with facial recognition. It explains that the passport is not checked et cetera. The changes are only for travelers with Global Entry (or equivalent). However, the article says the new facial recognition system is only at Chicago (ORD) Chicago's smaller airport Midway (MDY). Usually, one can depend on releases that come from the U.S. government. However, the article has an error in saying that the new GE facial recognition is only in Chicago. I personally experienced the new feature last month in LAX and in Houston (IAH). Here is a link to the article that will be interesting to those who use or will be using GE upon renewal. The article explains how easy the process of returning to the U.S. has become, immigration wise. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/ord-and-mdw-encourages-travelers-use-facial-recognition