Walker1

Partly inspired by the It's wrong thread. But made me wonder what do you do after retiring from escorting? Do most take regular jobs or earned/invested enough to live free? Does online photos/ads/porn follow you-especially in today's world where they track online presence? Just curious .

Is it legal? I don't think that is legal even in more liberal states?

Heaven must be missing an angel!

I don't know which is worse-a soul crushing corporate career or a job where you get your rocks off and get paid for it? Is marrying for money worse or sleeping with someone for money and being honest about it? It is about time it is legalized.

Nice, if you like the cold.

I wonder how much do these camera guys make? I think some youtube stars get 6 figures-but is it fleeting and then do they have endurance?

I still like an in-depth context. Now a days some odd statement somewhere and it is pitch fork and torches time. It could be that he was hesitant to have sex with other men in front of the camera and then he discovered he likes it. Or it could be he is gay for pay who hates his job and doing it for the money. Or it could be he is extremely homophobic. The statement in the belamitours site if it is official, seems tongue in cheek written by someone with English not their primary language. Not saying he could not, but before going all pitch fork and torches, I just would like to know the context, what they mean . It does not look like he said anything, they are saying it-which would be odd-unless what it looks like they are trying to imply is the deflowering of a sweet innocent man -the straight to gay fantasy. I used to be in perpetual outrage mode and always assumed the worst-it gets tiring after a while to live like that.

No evidence, just some anonymous blogger ?

Beautiful man.

If you are describing they/them and point to a singular person-no regular person would understand. They/them has a meaning-plural, a crowd-it could mean a million people, 10, 70, it could also mean non-humans, insect swarms etc eg when they fly, they flap their wings or when they run from a predator, they bunch up and keep their young in the middle of the herd. . Writers especially LGBT friendly may use the term, but then again that broadens to say someone with multiple personalities. By forcing people to accept that word for a single person -it just makes it confusing. A new word/term is best-language evolves- elevator, airplanes, submarines are all new words that got added as human understanding evolves?

They/them already has a meaning , so it is not fair and quite confusing to use that term for a single person. I have no problem if they have a new term or a new word to describe people who feel fluidic or multi-gender. Just don't butcher existing language. Language expands and new words are added all the time, why take a word/words that have specific meanings and try and change them? Singular, plural etc are all founding blocks. 1+1 = 2. But if you think you are male and female-that does not make you two persons? If you feel multi gender and sometimes I have identified more with say the female gender than the male-there should be a new word or term for that. Language evolves.

That is pale!

Just getting into a plane toilet to do my "business' is a pain-forget doing the "deed". Maybe in some of those foreign airlines with private rooms for first class?- but I certainly cannot afford them!

For many of us, they live on in our heads of what "normal" is supposed to be. It is amazing, we can move so forward, live in a relatively free society and still in the dark recesses of the mind carry all sorts of images that we may not even be aware of consciously-but still continue to be governed by. This thing called life:rolleyes:

steven kesslar-perhaps you should do a Ph.D?