cany10011

Perhaps men get bored easily. I do. I have 3 regulars that I see weekly pending scheduling, but am always cruising for some fresh meat.

Perhaps men get bored easily. I do. I have 3 regulars that I see weekly pending scheduling, but am always cruising for some fresh meat.

Sorry this happened. If the client knew you were driving such a long distance to get to him, he should have waited or provided some flexibility. I certainly would have waited up. It sounds like he needed his itch to be scratched immediately.
 
 
 
 

Sorry this happened. If the client knew you were driving such a long distance to get to him, he should have waited or provided some flexibility. I certainly would have waited up. It sounds like he needed his itch to be scratched immediately.
 
 
 
 

Previously / briefly called himself "Will" in Honolulu.....
 
https://m4m-forum.org/threads/will-honolulu.134620/#post-1481936

I wish that were the case, but in nyc, there are more than 700 advertised escorts and the rates are not as reasonably priced as other markets.

I wish that were the case, but in nyc, there are more than 700 advertised escorts and the rates are not as reasonably priced as other markets.

I wish that were the case, but in nyc, there are more than 700 advertised escorts and the rates are not as reasonably priced as other markets.

Thank you Manmed for saving me a visit Was too good to be true!

Thank you Manmed for saving me a visit Was too good to be true!

http://media.rentmen.eu/public/photos/main/44/284396_1522630368_nqv9w3f4rh.jpg

I booked Lars for tomorrow, taking the plunge and risking it.
If anyone doubted it, there is a real Lars Nielsen that did work for Belami: http://thebananablog.com/blog1/2017/11/11/belami-lars-nielsen/ and that pornstar looks exactly like the RM pics.
Anyone can confirm Mr Nielsen happens to be in NY these days? Maybe some belami fans like @Avalon can search the web for news or social media updates on Lars Nielsen?

I love that idea! Although i'm sure I would go into sensory overload with a whole team!

Oy vey.
 
This may be a mistake. I’m going to limit this comment to that of economics since I’m a nerd when it comes to that sort of thing and got an undergraduate degree in it. (Note I said undergraduate - not a Ph.D!! Ha!) That, and I have no need to be right and wish providers and clients the safest of successes - however they might be defined to them.
 
First - supply and demand is, of course, fundamental to economic theories. It’s basic enough for most folks to understand. If supply goes up and demand stays constant, then it should drive prices down because the number of purchasers of a product has not increased, but the availability of that product has increased. And, of course, the reverse is true.
 
What I see in this instance is not really a change in supply or demand, but instead a “constraint” upon the system or marketplace for connecting the provider(supply) with the consumer(demand). Sort of like if you suddenly closed down a stock exchange. The supply of stock is there and the potentialpurchasers of said stock are there but their vehicle (I.e organized exchange; their efficient way of connecting) is removed, negatively impacted, or is reduced in some way. They are left to connecting through their existing known relationships but have limited access to providers they have no current knowledge and/or connections with. Over time, though, they will develop ways to “find one another again.”
 
Now, if the passage and reaction to this law had happened more slowly, perhaps it could be argued that the market could have adjusted with large numbers of providers leaving the market to reduce supply, but basically this has happened relatively quickly, and I think it’s safe to assume that the supply of providers is relatively the same. I think it’s also safe to assume that the demand for providers has not changed.
 
So what has and/or will change? It’s the way in which providers and clients can easily connect and transact business through online platforms. Making it more difficult; reducing platforms and ease of contact has an impact on BOTH sides - I would argue equal impacts - it reduces opportunity for the provider and it impedes choices for the client. Therefore, I would expect prices to hold constant if it’s equal. This is at least until the marketplace finds a way to adapt - and I believe it will. How soon is hard to guess, but it will. In the meantime, I would expect providers to become more reliant on their “regulars” and those “regulars” will be potentially less distracted with other options in the meantime.
 
Anyhow, I could be wrong. I don’t claim to know everything, but I do think that the OP’s premise that demand will be going up is misled (or at least doesn’t acknowledge the factors mentioned here) unless the online portals used to connect providers and clients make up a small portion of the market, which I doubt.
 
Bottom line is I believe that the law places a constraint on the industry which has impacts on both sides of the supply/demand equation.
 
And this will hopefully be the extent of my contribution of another long-winded post on this thread. Thanks for indulging an Econ nerd if you even read to this point. Cheers and best wishes to all!

For 500 I'd hire twins, for 5000 I'd hire a football team.
(Preferably Aussie Rules football).

It sounds like both providers and clients will be affected by this ruling. May be prudent instead of escalating a "trade war" by increasing prices to supporting each other by continuing business as usual.

I’m with @Lance_Navarro and @VictorPowers on this one. I absolutely love what I do and I’m interested in continuing to be busy. I don’t see raising my rates as an effective means of protesting; it ultimately stands as a fear reaction that screws clients and is counter to my goals.
 
I think we all might benefit from taking a step back and honestly evaluating our reactions. There is a lot of fear and we all know by now that fear is a poor motivator for change, and doesn’t solve problems. I’m not saying that what’s happening right now is right, or fair, or makes any kind of sense at all – like many of you, I’m ready to fight, and I’m ready to see this law go down against a constitutional challenge. But, conducting ourselves as if money is the only thing that matters and acting as if our world will end because of this law is lunacy.

If you really believe what you just wrote, you urgently need to see a mental health specialist.
 
I wonder what the clients you claim to have would say or do if they had access to read the things you wrote in this forum.
 
I still wish you the best.

I appreciate the escort's point of view. But, as a client, if my regulars raise their rates to 500 an hour, I would rather find an NYU or Columbia boytoy on seeking arrangements who would be happy with 3K monthly for frequent meetings.

I appreciate the escort's point of view. But, as a client, if my regulars raise their rates to 500 an hour, I would rather find an NYU or Columbia boytoy on seeking arrangements who would be happy with 3K monthly for frequent meetings.

I appreciate the escort's point of view. But, as a client, if my regulars raise their rates to 500 an hour, I would rather find an NYU or Columbia boytoy on seeking arrangements who would be happy with 3K monthly for frequent meetings.

I appreciate the escort's point of view. But, as a client, if my regulars raise their rates to 500 an hour, I would rather find an NYU or Columbia boytoy on seeking arrangements who would be happy with 3K monthly for frequent meetings.

I appreciate the escort's point of view. But, as a client, if my regulars raise their rates to 500 an hour, I would rather find an NYU or Columbia boytoy on seeking arrangements who would be happy with 3K monthly for frequent meetings.

I appreciate the escort's point of view. But, as a client, if my regulars raise their rates to 500 an hour, I would rather find an NYU or Columbia boytoy on seeking arrangements who would be happy with 3K monthly for frequent meetings.

I appreciate the escort's point of view. But, as a client, if my regulars raise their rates to 500 an hour, I would rather find an NYU or Columbia boytoy on seeking arrangements who would be happy with 3K monthly for frequent meetings.