former lurker

Your post prompted a tangential thought: the legalities are much smoother when medical professionals pronounce death, usually in a hospital setting. My brother took his life in a one-car crash. His cause of death was obviously suicide, but it took months to sort out with the medical examiner, his body had to be identified, blood tests were run to rule out a chemical cause of the crash, etc. My father died in the hospital. My mom died at home, in my presence, but as her breathing started to halt I called 911. The EMTs attempted to revive her, then took her to the hospital where she was pronounced. My parent's deaths were logistically smoother because they were pronounced in hospitals.

I'm of the same view. There were a few times when I had to push for my father to be admitted to the hospital and those proved life saving.

My father was the same way. In his case it was an outgrowth of being a control freak. My mom was always a bit late so he'd set artificial times an hour ahead to ensure his real timetable was met, but then he'd get upset that the fake time wasn't met. My nephew inherited my father's obsession with scheduling. His wife flatly told him that her family doesn't think in terms of being "late". They go and come on their own time.

I always thought "morbid" translated to "hard" or "stiff".

True. And that level of difficulty, whatever the reason, leaves me disinterested in hiring him.

His pictures are alluring. Good to hear he lives up to them. How he performs is another matter. Glad you had a good time. I'd work like hell to make it work if I met him.

I apologize if my post seemed to say that. I was just speculating about why he might block anyone. As I said, who really knows. There may be factors we have no insight about, or he might be difficult. Please know I'm not leveling any accusation at you or others who've had the same or similar experience. Perhaps his blocking is something we'll never get explained coherently.

Who knows. Perhaps he blocks people who look at his ad multiple times without booking him. There are also fora where escorts "review" clients and spread warnings about time wasters, etc. You could have one bad experience with an escort and get posted as someone to avoid. Or it could be something entirely different. In any event, my (unsolicited) advice is simply to approach escorts with integrity. Don't dither or waste their time. Be clear about a real interest. And only contact guys you really want to hire based on your research. The initial meeting is the one where you and the escort are most likely to be wary/uncertain, so this advice is about the first meeting. Once you know the guy and he knows you, a lot of the defensiveness/caution on both sides dissipates.

That's great to hear. In these times, that comes close to being a win. Best to you.

And what did you say, and what did he say? I guess you've decided to hire? You previously said you weren't hiring, just window shopping.

Have you met him?

Bradley Black.

I thought "frappe" was a word peculiar to New England, and thus unlikely to be a blender setting label.

I worked with someone who used to manage a Lane Bryant store. It was Lane Bryant's policy to accept all customer returns in the name of customer service. Every year, there were a handful of customers who bought and wore entire wardrobes, including undergarments, and then returned them at the end of the season for a refund. It drove my colleague crazy, but he worked for a corporation and it was corporate policy. Escorts/providers work for themselves and set their own terms. I, for one, would never expect extras when I shop, even though you could call that customer service on the same logic. I respect the providers time, as I expect him to respect mine.

Absolutely. Imagine it from the other perspective. Your done in 50 minutes and the provider gets ready to leave. Many clients would be upset because they paid for 60 minutes and they want the provider to stay the full time. Wanting the escort to stay extra time without paying for it because the mood is right is the flip side of that.

I get that, but the "time" thing cuts both ways. How many posts on here complain that the sex was done and the provider left early. Clients want the full time they pay for. The provider wants to be paid for his time and not comp time after the paid time has run.

That seems an odd reaction to me. If you hired for an hour, and he gave you a notice with 5 minutes left, that, to me, is a good thing. It gives you the opportunity to focus on how to spend the last 5 minutes rather than running out of your time without notice.

"That"? Do you mean "him" or "his services"?

Rates may be variable, depending on what's going on with the provider, the time you commit to, and what you want to do. That's why it's advisable to ask the provider. As far as social media goes, it depends on whether it's the legal identity or stage name. Unless the provider shares his personal social media, it's uncool to "out" him, and there's the fact that some "fans" go too far in posting comments, etc. Finally, it's the policy here to not post reviews in the message center but to keep reviews through the Daddy's Review site.

Tristan, your are a mensch.

no. you make no sense.

Insurance often fails to fully cover losses. There are caps that the insurance companies apply. They won't pay more than their assessed value, even if the house would have sold for a lot more on the market. Then there are all of the possessions that get destroyed but for which you don't have receipts, etc.

Guys who cam or have OF accounts often engage in butt play because that's what their customers want to see. So, the answer to your question depends on what he's using his twitter posts to promote.

I'm thinking that you're referring to Trent Foster(s).

Perhaps the girls aren't disgusted by him, but by the admiring looks from guys.