former lurker

Timarrie Baker. What a stud. I just wish he was on my side of the continent.

I know the chorus of "the client is always right" has chimed in, and what I'm about to say is going to go against the grain. From what you've written, I fully understand why the scort would be apprehensive. These guys are in a precarious situation. They face the prospect of being set up for prosecution, they get calls/messages/emails from all sorts of people who will never follow through, but think they're entitled to know intimate sexual details, often just because knowing those details get them off. I interpret what he wrote to you as sincere, thoughtful, and, dare I say, bordering on kind. He's tried to accommodate your issues. No need to trash him.

Man. Re read your posts. You're persistently negative. Why? Do you make poor choices constantly? Do you have unreasonable standards? Do you think you should be adorded, and yet you're not? I mean, what is your deal, because it's clear in your posts.

Get thee to the woodshed!

I've thought about this for a long time, and refrained until now commenting. You are annoying. You've made clear, over and over again, that you're not engaged in hiring. You use self-deprecation (you're fat with a small dick, and uninterested in Tops) as deflection for a fairly consistent set of negative posts about escorts you've never met. You comment on "top" escorts just to say you're a top and you'd never hire them. Why comment at all? It appears, and I of course could be wrong, that you use this forum as a form of therapy. If so, not a good idea. Find someone trained to help with your issues and work through them. An online forum about escorts isn't a substitute for mental health therapy. Again, I'll say, I don't know you or your issues well enough to diagnose you -- sorta my point -- but there is something in your posts that suggests a bit of a pathology. So get some help. That's what's best for you, and that's all I'm hoping for -- what's best for you.

Grow up. These are people. And they operate in a difficult environment, with legal and health risks. The strident nature of your comment suggests a severe lack of empathy, a sense of entitlement when "hiring", and a sense that because you're hiring, the escort is contracted to do your bidding regardless of his health or his concerns. Fairly ugly I'd say. But your other posts don't display this sort of disregard for the escorts, so I'll cut you some slack, while disagreeing strenuously with this one post.

Yeah. So what. When you've been asked to go to "work" events, were you to do so as arm candy? Also, you had every reason to assume going to the event(s) would enhance your work situation, or at least maintain it -- the "escort" did not. Finally, from the description, it was on short notice that the escort was asked to this -- in such cases, even in a formal work environment, declining should not be a reason to denigrate him. What I take from this post of yours is that you'd be a good person to have working for you, but you're not a good person to work for. Unless, as a I suspect, you have a different standard to the "escort" than you do for employees at your formal employment.

Couldn't disagree more. The "pendulum", if there is one, on this site is all the way on the client side. Escorts get no slack for cancelling (because the client was "counting" on being serviced; escorts are judged on the authenticity of their photos and their "honesty"; there's a strict "I don't pay in advance of service" "rule"; if an escort states a preference for the type of client he prefers, he's excoriated for being racist or ageist or a body fascist. Let's face it: escorts are human beings, and they are in a business fraught with legal and health risks. They often have to spend a good deal of time dealing with potential but not eventual clients testing them out through texts, calls, skype, etc. All of this may seem reasonable from the perspective of us clients, but not so much from the other side. And, at least on this site, there seem to be rules set in stone that protect the client but not so much the escort. So, I'll conclude this post by restating, the people who escort are just as human as the people who hire.

Geez! What a spectacular way to expose yourself as a supreme asshole. I suspect you'll just change your forum name in an effort to purge the stench from your venom, but in your next incarnation you won't be able to hide the venom anyway. Do a favor to the lads who escort, and put your money to better use than hiring them. Instead, find a good therapist and work through your issues.

I've read your posts here. You seem high maintenance. Maybe it's you, and not them.

He was known as "Chip Tanner" on Randy Blue. From what I've read, he's an acrobat and gymnast, and has a fantastic body. Because he self-identifies as straight, I'd suggest being specific about what you expect and get him to be specific about what he will deliver.

Sex on a stick.

Once saw a guy on the subway, holding onto an upper bar, pecs bulging, and biceps beyond belief. Handsome, great hair and great face. Spectactular.

Holy Shit. This guy ticks all of my "boxes", and he'd have full access to them. He's quite the male specimen.

Isn't he a former Sean Cody model? I think he went by Graham.

Precisely why so many ads are now so vague.

Sorry, but what do you mean by "it" made a few videos?

I'd put "grindr" conversations into a different category. Their not about hiring situations. So I thinks it's a bit unfair to hold someone to a non-hiring situation when that's what's you're actually arranging.

I assume you meant amazing striation.

And?

Yeah. For most of these situations 49 is older.

Not sure of the point from this post. You recount communication resulting in your not following through with a meet. Then you contact him again. Why would you expect him to respond, given that he's already been "burned" by you?

Marcus Ruhl.