Jump to content

former lurker

Members
  • Posts

    2,918
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by former lurker

  1. I reached up to kiss him. He responded. I asked for breath on my neck, he responded. I wanted to enjoy the body he has built, and he responded. That's all in addition to him doing to me what I told him I wanted, even though it wasn't part of our original agreement. He takes care of you. I'm not sure I understand the venom. I met with him, he treated me extremely well. I don't know why you'd think otherwise? Did he back out on you? If he did, move on. Like I said these guys have to wonder about whom their meeting. I don't begrudge them being careful. It does seem to me that trying to question the motives of those who post something that doesn't fit your narrative says more about you than about me.
  2. It sounds like your biggest issue with him is he backed out. I try not to judge these guys on trying to protect themselves, even if you think they don't need protection from you. I've met him. He was ridiculously handsome, built beyond my expectations, did everything we agreed to and then a lot more. I'm waiting to set up another appointment. He said his phone is off for a while -- I assume, but don't know, it's because he's working on his exams. This I can tell you, based on my encounter: he delivered all he promised, and then did a whole lot more. He seemed into the moment. If I were younger, and in better shape, and could offer him more than a session, this boy's a keeper. He's not only well-hung, well-built, talented and willing, he seems to be really into perfecting his body, which I find odd, because, if you meet him, you'll realize he's got a body that rocks.
  3. I thought about whether or not to respond. I decided that stuff stays on the net, and people read it quickly and may not evaluate credibility carefully without a response. So here goes. First, the word "troll" is offensive, and it's use is subjective. Second, your advice about how to find attention? Really? Do you have a degree in psychiatry? If so, do you feel free offering that sort of diagnosis/advice based on postings on a board? I must have said/posted something that set you off. Not sure exactly what that was. Perhaps I said you seemed cheap. A lot of posters on here seem overly focused on whether the escorts charge them too much. My view on that is you pay what you're willing to pay, and don't spend a lot of time carping about what you're not willing to pay. Finally, you used the word "sincerely". I hope you realize that to be sincere, you have to have perspective.
  4. I saw him. He was extraordinary.
  5. Good on you. He seems likes hes worth it.
  6. You could have used "QED" which is a bit I'm not sure about the tech, but I've always appreciated your perspective. You seem to be a really great guy.
  7. I've actually gotten more than my share in the last week. But always up for more.
  8. Thanks.
  9. So again, you offer an opinion but not substance. I'll offer an observation about your posts. Some of them are negative and obvious fakes. Thanks. But I think we can figure those out "fey robert" for example. Second, you trash guys you have not met. I just don't get that.
  10. So thanks for noticing tone. It's been about response. I'm not a provider -- god, I wish I had the looks. I don't. I'm in my mid fifties, puffy, and grateful for any attention I get, which is generally paid attention.
  11. Have you met him? Did he do wrong by you? Why are you so negative? It's also lazy and unreasonable to associate any pushback to a false identity. I could call you a scammer, with no merit, just as you have. If this is your version of "betting", you wasting your money. I'm a client. Older. Not anything special. It really amazes me how in this age of the internet people make up all sorts or shit and pose it as reality.
  12. Repeating yourself without substance doesn't really do much. Have you met the guy? Do you have a first hand basis for any comments?
  13. Too funny. You cattily remark about short "fortune cookie" sentences, then say very little, and when it's pointed out, you say you're "too subtle". It's good if you can fool yourself.
  14. And this post? Not too elaborate or well developed. Should we judge you by your own standards?
  15. I will.
  16. Prepaid money? Otherwise, the no show means you don't pay.
  17. So you've expressed your point. Several times. Let the rest of us decide for ourselves, after you fairly extensive input.
  18. That's funny. Read your own posts. Occasionally they're balanced. Often they're not.
  19. I made an observation. I've not met him. Neither have you. Yet you feel it's you're right to disparage. It's an unattractive quality,
  20. So, no. But typical. When you have nothing of substance to say, attack. And frankly the several posters on here who insist they're not "cheap" but carp about money, well, if it quacks like a duck.
  21. No, we don't. Read your posts. Their almost all about how much you spend.
  22. Too much time on your hands.
  23. So. Not cool.
  24. Yeah. Silly. He and others in his business have reasons to be careful. Your lack of empathy says a lot.
×
×
  • Create New...