former lurker

Cheap is cheap. Live it. Learn it. And your offering all sorts or opinions on here without personal experience, yet you don't want to be judged? Kettle?

Yeah, cheap is the point. And the reason they don't post is the take-down of rentboy and the risk. I mean you can deny it all you want, but cheat is the ultimate point.

Look, I'm not going through a list of your past posts, but if I did, I'm pretty sure I'd find the sort of price bitchiness that invades this thread. Bottom line, you didn't meet him, and yet you comment based solely on you price haggling.

So you say "if", meaning no real experience, yet you comment. Why?

Sad.

Fine. But you read a lot into that. He's starting out. He's learning. He's handling things himself. He's a person, not a machine.

You seem high maintenance. Maybe that was the issue.

So, nasty. What's you're deal?

His communication with me has been excellent. He says in his ad that he's new to this, so some adjustments are to be expected. The negative comments are about price and haggling, not meeting up. The only comments about actually meeting are complimentary. There's a habit on this board of being cheap. These guys put a lot into their bodies, and they demand a price. Pay it. And stop being so cheap.

So the point is you're a cheap haggler? And he didn't dig that?

The pictures belong to a fairly well-known muscle model named JB Fackelmeyer. I wrote to the advertiser to ask if it was him and haven't heard back.

I'd say it's your cost, unless he offers otherwise. In fact, he could reasonably ask you to pay for his commute time.

Who's your avatar? He's hot.

So, no. Brett was truly handsome and perfectly muscular. This guy wouldn't be Brett's offspring. Not to say this guy is ugly, but Brett was stupendous.

Again, I ask you for specifics. You don't offer them. And you keep saying the same stuff without providing any details. And, btw, what you think you "know" is usually open to interpretation.

Please clarify: have you had an experience with James, and what are the details? You're posts imply something, but don't say it. If you have, tell us, give us the facts, and we can evaluate. If you haven't, it's really unfair to James for you to tar him without basis. So, man up, tell us the deets.

What are you talking about? Is this about James or a generic screed against guys who hire escorts? If you're the same guy that posts on Muscleservice, I'd note that you pointed out plenty of times that you don't hire -- as if you're better than that -- until Ryan Steele and Jesse Jaymes came along. I commend your good taste in them. I guess I'll leave it at that, but I'm still confused about the point you're trying to make.

Which is it? You know you were wrong and apologize, or he's inferior to other escorts (when you didn't meet him, and couldn't really know)? Each of your posts makes you look worse.

I'm frankly surprised by your take. Perhaps you're not reading the posts carefully enough. James was there on time, as requested. "Doc" told him to wait, without giving him a time frame. He waited 15 minutes, left, and then was texted a request to return. "Doc" assumed where James was located, but didn't confirm it. You're putting a lot of extra responsibility on "James" to get "Doc" to respond after he put "James" off. It also seems to me that a lot depends on whether this is a first meeting. Once a client (and an escort) have demonstrated reliability, some "slack" may be warranted. But a first time meeting where one flakes on the other, doesn't justify going an extra mile.

No. You were at fault, not him. Why should you get back what ostensibly is to protect him from your very scenario?

You're putting too much on the escort to straighten out a situation imposed by the client. The escort showed up, on time, and was put off by the client (indefinitely). No promise of payment for missed time or travel. Just pure expectation.

Stop. You were an ass. And you continue to trash him. You never met him. And it was all due to your own poor behavior. So just stop. It's both pitiful (you) and spiteful for you to keep degrading James.

You just keep digging that hole. Your story is changing, and not in ways that make you look better. First, you tell us you made him wait and he left and then you were peeved he didn't agree to return when you were ready to receive him. Now you're claiming you told him to leave (did you offer to pay him anything for his time, which you wasted?). You at least tacitly admit your fault by saying you've apologized (to us, at least -- you don't say you've apologized directly to him). Yet you still indirectly trash James by saying you "disagree" and that others are better. This was all your fault. Own it. And don't badmouth someone who showed up, was left high and dry, and uncompensated for his trouble. Your behavior was, to put it mildly, shoddy.

Shame on you. Reflect on your own conduct. Condemning others for responding to your clear failings is pathetic. It could cost him business, even though it's clearly you're own fault from your descriptions. I suppose you'll see it otherwise, and justify, and rationalize. Too bad. But don't trash him when it's really you that caused all of this. Maybe grow up?

No offense intended, but you seem to have expressed a lot of negative experiences. So I'm wondering: are you experiencing more negative stuff, is it because you're more adventurous or more negatitve? And I'd have to say, some of the stuff you've said is not only unsupported (at least in your posts) but fairly offensive. For example: 3 no shows -- means you have no basis to judge anything other than a willingness to see you. And givien the "no shows", what's your basis for proclaiming him a drug user and stating there are much better available?