purplekow

I had about 50 kids in total who came in three large groups and in addition there were about a dozen smaller groups. All totaled, perhaps 75 to 100 kids. Two of them rejected the candy I offered as they did not like that kind of candy and did not hesitate to say so. That is new and just a bit of an indication of where the world is going. I should admit that one of the refusers did take another set of candy that I offered (I have been giving three small pieces) saying that his father liked that kind of candy, so perhaps there is a bit of hope there.

I may be naive but your post indicates to me that you are looking for purely a transactional relationship and as a result, that is what you are finding. Perhaps searching for a friend with benefits or something more than that will only happen if you get out of your comfort zone. Money is indeed an aphrodisiac for many, but perhaps you need to find a way of meeting someone where many is not the attraction. You do not say why money is not an issue or what you do with your day, but perhaps you should consider doing something different. Travel in different circles perhaps. When I was single, I found I had the most success in meeting someone when I was not looking and was just going about my day. Be open, honest, approachable and friendly and perhaps you will find someone who is interested in you more than in Ben Franklin and his brothers. I wish you luck in meeting someone who is looking past your finances to find your worth.

Wuite a shame that thinly time you have won it was 10 million dollars. That is a shame that you could not win more often. I see you corrected it to 10000 dollars. Not a bad haul but not an amount that would generate a sarcastic reply from me.

I only knew him through the Palm Springs gatherings and by his posts here. When I was in his company, he was gracious, welcoming and he generated a real sense of personal warmth. He spoke in a way that assured me that he had enjoyed his life in his younger years working in education and in retirement, living the life of a man of leisure and embracing each minute. I find myself moved beyond that which I would expect under these circumstances and I think that reflects his ability to make a large impact even in short encounters. I know he will be missed and remembered. Oliver, stay strong. I believe he would only want you to celebrate his life and not grieve his passing.

I did this with a friends on drunken night about 30 years ago. Wasn't smart then and isn't smart now.

Interesting Age 18 to 24. Free 24/7. With Free lockers. Seems to be a prudent decision

Did they do the Batusi? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?&q=batusi&docid=608031137565068090&mid=B4314E20146D64A578E9B4314E20146D64A578E9&view=detail&form=VDQVAP&rvsmid=BCAC83DB727472E64F5ABCAC83DB727472E64F5A&ajaxhist=0

Might I suggest the combining a costume with a masquerade, you could attend as Mr. Moneybags from Monopoly. He wears a morning coat and a top hat as you are fundraising, Mr. Moneybags would be an appropriate statement.

Might I suggest the combining a costume with a masquerade, you could attend as Mr. Moneybags from Monopoly. He wears a morning coat and a top hat as you are fundraising, Mr. Moneybags would be an appropriate statement. Note White mustache. Cane. Red bow tie. Grey trousers. No Monocle. He is commonly thought to wear a monocle but he does not. However, as it is commonly believed he does, you might want to keep one in the pocket of the morning coat. I would add a pocket watch and chain, only because I have several and very few reasons to wear them. https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=monopoloy+man+image&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 Addendum. If you have time to grow the mustache you could dye it. You can still use any type of eye cover mask and the white mustache might hide your identity a bit.

Perhaps and perhaps not. My guess is that escorts get their world's rocked now and again during some sessions Of course it is hard to ascertain that by asking, as a professional escort will give you a knowing smile without commitment and a less experienced escort might overplay the answer. So one can only go by what one observes. I tend to look on it with a positive light, because why the hell not. Part of the illusion for me is that the escort ihas had a good time and so in order to play my role as the contented patron, I choose to think that he has. After all sometimes illusion and reality coincide. So unless I am told otherwise, to my way of thinking, they had a great time. I have the receipt to prove it.

Your syntax is a bit confusing. You left them thinking "what just happened". So is it you who are doing the thinking or them? I prefer it when my guys stammer a bit at the end or, even better, when they stagger a bit, on the way out and say something such as. "I wasn't expecting that.". Because of my age and physical appearance, it is not surprising to me that they are coming in with low expectations. They have looked at the cover and thought "Meh" but then they are surprised by the book. I long ago stopped surprising myself with consistency but that does happen as well. As to the original question, I think it is very important for me to be guiding what goes on with an escort. I frequently do not know exactly what I want until I want it. So sometimes an escort will walk in and I can't help but push him against the wall and start right in with deep hard kissing, lots of body pressure and a rapid removal of clothing. Other times, I like a drink, a bit of conversation, a gentle kiss and to take his hand and guide him to the bedroom. Slow deep kissing and a tantalizing removal of his clothing. Slow start with added intensity as the session goes on. The point being, if I don't know what I want, how can the escort know? I have got to show him. Usually on first contact, I tell the escort, I do not know what is going to happen when you get here so we will figure it out together. " Is there anywhere we can't go?" Usually I will mostly respect those boundaries, but I must admit to finding it a challenge to have the escort expand his limits, just as much as I enjoy having him expand mine.

I don't mind if a man arrives late. It is preferable to his coming early.

Superman obviously is terrible in bed ;being faster than a speeding bullet and all. The Flash similarly is likely to suffer from being too fast. Batman should be able to do it upside down, so that seems like it may add some kink to the encounter. We know that Spiderman and Tarzan are both swingers so I figure they would be into some group scenes. It is a shame that The Thing cannot have sex when he is rock hard. So it seems that many Superheroes are neither super nor heroes in bed. I think the villains might be better as, lets be honest, we all love a bad boy.

I have a type. Submissive shorter muscular guys between 30 and 40 who can hold a conversation before and after. I would do an initial hire with this type of man preferentially but most of my better experiences have been with men who are not submissive, who are not shorter than I and who are usually a bit older than my type. In fact my hottest experiences during the pandemic were with men who had none of those characteristics. So do I really have a type or is my type a typo? What about you is your type your type or a typo?

My preferred eatery in Manhattan usually has an umbrella and dirty water franks. It is great in the winter because the heat from the hot water can knock out the winter chills and in the summer the umbrella gives a bit a protection against the sun and the sodas are usually very cold. Of the restaurants on the Michelin list, I enjoyed Daniel and I agree that Peter Luger's is well past its prime rib.

I had a patient who was exceeding good looking and hung around the Hollywood scene in the fifties and 60s. He told some interesting stories about Marilyn Monroe as he was a good friend of hers near the end. He claimed to have been in her home the day she died and left at her request as she was expecting Bobby Kennedy. He returned to the house in the early morning hours and was meet by the maid who told him that she was dead. In any case, he had nothing good to say about Paul Newman. HE said that of all the Hollywood stars he had met and bedded, that Paul Newman was the most arrogant and least considerate. Still, I would have given an arrogant and inconsiderate young Newman a tumble had I had the opportunity.

He played Little League ion Eastchester NY, one of my homes in the past. They have his name on the field and his number 7 is hanging on the backstop

I saw him when he was in his clean cut body builder phase and he was great. I saw him again as he headed into his long haired kind of disheveled stage and he was less great but still fun. I see he got into porn a bit but then faded from view. Anyone with any insight?

Clearly you have an opinion which are now defending with circular reasoning: Your premise: People only died with Covid if they had a preexisting condition therefore if you died of Covid you had a preexisting condition. . A million people in the US died. About 10000 of them were under 50. If you chose to believe that every one of those 100000 who died had some vague underlying condition to justify which is reality is an unjustifiable position, continue. If you do not know you have a pre-existing condition and it is found on autopsy, then your decision to not take the vaccine as you did not have a pre-existing condition was incorrect but unknowable. By the way, The number of autopsies done during the height of the pandemic were minimal as most medical personel were busy trying to keep people alive. Autopsies in general have decreased in frequency for many reasons but to assert or imply that autopsies would have proven that those young people who died of Covid really had a previously unknown risk factor which became apparent post mortem has no bearing on their particular decision to have or not have the vaccine. But there is a precedent for uncovering underlying disease on autopsy. During the Viet Nam war autopsies done on battle field casualties revealed an astonishing high number of them had a degree of coronary artery disease, most men in their 20s many hard early CAD. Those people still died of the wounds inflicted and not from CAD. The healthy people under 50 who died from Covid, died from Covid. One day they were fine and a week later they were dead from Covid. Many of those that died did so after the vaccine was available and they chose not to take it. They lived with that decision and some of them died as a result of that decision. If anything your argument that only at risk young individuals died of Covid would suggest that since one can never be absolutely sure that one does not have a risk factor since there was this great uncovering of risky medical condition on the innumerable autopsies you suggest were done, that taking the vaccine to cover that possibility is probably prudent. That was the decision that you made for yourself. That indicates to mean that you at least think there may be some legitimacy to the vaccinations.

First, there were certainly young healthy people who died from Covid. About 10% of the deaths have been in people under 50. Some of those were at risk, but many were not. Unfortunately, I took care of many such patients and even many of those who survived had prolonged hospital stays and secondary effects such as myocarditis, Guillan Barre syndrome, renal failure, pulmonary embolism etc. Vaccinations have dramatically decreased the number of admissions to the hospital and were a first line prevention of many serious cases. They did not prevent disease necessarily. They. did limit the severity of disease and the cost to the health care system and the economy as a whole. The vaccine also allowed science to catch up and develop other treatments which limited disease severity and length of contagion. From my limited experience, caring for several hundred people with Covid, at the onset, there were the elderly and those at high risk being admitted who came severely ill and died during the first wave. The hospital in which I worked had about 150 beds which were designated for Covid patients, we now have 6. Eventually, there was a lull in the numbers of people being admitted to the hospital. That occurred at the time of vaccines, mask protocol and with the change in the weather which allowed people to more easily avoid significant contacts. With the second wave, the patients I cared for in the hospital were generally younger than during the first wave and almost exclusively unvaccinated. The death rate was lower, people went home sooner as better treatments were available and the news stopped reporting on the numbers of people dying 1 million in the US, though there still were and are people dying. I have no doubt that vaccinations saved lives and limited morbidity. That some people opt to continue to espouse that philosophy against vaccinations does not mean they are stupid, but it does, in my opinion, make them foolish in this decision. I feel about them, they way I feel about people who say they do not worry about the effects of tobacco because their grandmother is 91 and smokes two packs a day, and that is you take your chance and if you lose, you and the health care economy pay the price. I am glad you opted for the vaccine. I think you were generous in waiting for others who were at higher risk to have access to the limited supply of vaccines that was the case early on. You considered the pluses and minuses as you saw them and opted for the vaccine. I wish others had taken the same considerations and come to the same decision. I had several young healthy patients in particular, for whom making a different decision contributed to their dying much too young.

Well the fresh fish in Palm Springs may not be so good. But as long as you are not a heel to her, she will not be a sole soul.

Well in my imaginary trip to Antarctica with my imaginary benefactor/friend, I would naturally have invented the Iceberg Martini if it did not already exist. I have no conscious knowledge that I have ever heard of an Iceberg Martini but my mind has a way of grabbing useless information, so perhaps I had. I like my Iceberg Martini with a Titanic steak and then I crash.

Financial discrepancies in a friendship is not any different than any other inequality. Friends figure out how to make it work. My younger friends will bear with my lack of physical prowess. My thin friends will accommodate my latest weight loss plan when inviting me for dinner. I similarly will figure out a reasonable vegan meal though I am a carnivore for the most part. Monetary inequity does raise many issues, but as others have said here, honest conversation and a willingness to avoid having pride interfere as an issue, will allow most to work around this. If I had a friend willing to take me on a 14 day trip to Antarctica, I would gladly go, but the first round or Iceberg Martinis would be on me and I would be sure to have a meaningful gift, not necessarily expensive gift, for them after our return. Thanks do not need to be given in kind, but they do need to be given in kindness. As to those with so much money that they worry that their friends are using them, I say: Get the fuck over yourself. My life is plenty rich without your money and if you do not know your friends well enough to know that about them, perhaps you are not really their friend. I would also suggest to those who have exceptional financial means, do not pay for everything. If a friend offers to get a meal, let them. Do so without a word except thank you. R E S P E C T find out what is means to me

If a man is clothed, I like a round ass in tight pants. If the man is naked, well then any part can be a party.

At the local Costco here, you do not have to provide proof of membership to use the compressors.