Jump to content

411 on Bryceharper


Lee_jeff
This topic is 2701 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Feels like he is part of that new sexually fluid group of young white guys all college age all over

6 ft with buff bodies and decent weiners..and handsome faces.. and don't mind gay 4 pay..count me in.. always wondered if you get two of them together for a three way if they would finally do a complete full service with each other and the client

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
And two of the reviewers said:

 

Recommend? No, I don't think so

 

Maybe he's cute but doesn't "play well with others".

 

Notice that the current Rentmen ad has four reviews--and three of the four say the pictures are phony. Caveat emptor.

 

Interesting how many of yinz (not pointing at the folks I've quoted) don't trust RM reviews unless they're negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe he's cute but doesn't "play well with others".

 

 

 

Interesting how many of yinz (not pointing at the folks I've quoted) don't trust RM reviews unless they're negative.

 

 

But there is this distinction: Rentmen has an incentive to screen out valid as well as bogus negative reviews, as such reviews will tend to drive out some escorts away from advertising on its website (they can focus on BackPage or Men4Rent), thereby depriving Rentmen of revenues. Conversely, Rentmen has much less incentive to screen out bogus as well as valid positive reviews, as such reviews will be good for business.

 

There is a counterpoint: If Rentmen really cares about its reputation and wants to be the "go-to" site where all credible escorts want to advertise, then its people will allow some bad reviews that appear nonbogus, but the website will still have an incentive to scrutinize bad reviews more closely than good reviews.

 

Also, the incentives to produce bogus good reviews are overwhelming: Escorts (good or bad) have strong incentives to "prime the pump" by submitting bogus good reviews themselves or via their buddies. Incentives to produce bogus bad reviews are unquestionably tempting (not just unhappy clients but also spurned boyfriends and escort competitors) but are not as overwhelming as the former. Also, escorts can sometimes "tell" who submitted a bad review, and so there are also strong incentives against posting bad reviews that are perfectly valid.

 

Bottom line: Because of the skewed incentives, bad reviews on Rentmen are more trustworthy than good reviews. How much more? Who knows. But at the very least they raise red flags that suggest further investigation (e.g., on this Forum) before proceeding with an appointment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But there is this distinction: Rentmen has an incentive to screen out valid as well as bogus negative reviews, as such reviews will tend to drive out some escorts away from advertising on its website (they can focus on BackPage or Men4Rent), thereby depriving Rentmen of revenues. Conversely, Rentmen has much less incentive to screen out bogus as well as valid positive reviews, as such reviews will be good for business.

 

There is a counterpoint: If Rentmen really cares about its reputation and wants to be the "go-to" site where all credible escorts want to advertise, then its people will allow some bad reviews that appear nonbogus, but the website will still have an incentive to scrutinize bad reviews more closely than good reviews.

 

Also, the incentives to produce bogus good reviews are overwhelming: Escorts (good or bad) have strong incentives to "prime the pump" by submitting bogus good reviews themselves or via their buddies. Incentives to produce bogus bad reviews are unquestionably tempting (not just unhappy clients but also spurned boyfriends and escort competitors) but are not as overwhelming as the former. Also, escorts can sometimes "tell" who submitted a bad review, and so there are also strong incentives against posting bad reviews that are perfectly valid.

 

Bottom line: Because of the skewed incentives, bad reviews on Rentmen are more trustworthy than good reviews. How much more? Who knows. But at the very least they raise red flags that suggest further investigation (e.g., on this Forum) before proceeding with an appointment.

 

I understand your point but unless the escort has access to several cellphones he won't be able to post fabricated positive reviews about himself. RM requires a code to be send to a cellphone in order to post a review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this information is great but the focus of this thread was.....

 

IS THIS GUY REAL OR FAKE??

 

has anyone ever met him?? I will be heading West in mid November and plan to see some Vegas and California guys

 

His last two reviews would scare me off. If you can't get reliable info from a forum member, then I would avoid Bryce.

 

~ Boomer ~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His last two reviews would scare me off. If you can't get reliable info from a forum member, then I would avoid Bryce.

 

~ Boomer ~

Thanks! Exactly!!! I was hoping to get information about him and not the validity of rentmen reviews

I have been burned in the past by rentmen and backpage

So I rely on forum members to share with us.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...