Jump to content

escort outs Conde Nast's CFO...

Tom Isern

By + Tom Isern
in The Lounge

This topic is 3214 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

rvwnsd Grand Master

rvwnsd

Posted
Posted
How ironic that I just commented how Brodie and his prices this week. There are plenty of other escorts he could have gone with!

I was just thinking how coincidental it is that your comment and this imbroglio occurred within days of each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Gar1eth Grand Master

+ Gar1eth

Posted
Posted
But not because they were wrong, but because they didn't want to be forced to remove the post.

 

 

I noticed that about their resignations too. Obviously I'm not saying an editor ought to resign or be fired after all mistakes. But this one was a whopper of a mistake with far reaching consequences. What right did they have to expose this guy?He's not a public figure. And the editors don't even sound repentant. I'm glad they are gone. In fact I think they ought to be retroactively fired.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gar1eth Grand Master

+ Gar1eth

Posted
Posted
Brody Sinclair admits to exposing client.

 

https://www.facebook.com/sexyderek2720/posts/10207276200411567?pnref=story

 

And apparently is proud of himself as he is "at war with this Government."

 

I will say I'm not sure how you can throw someone out of their apartment due to having a service dog.

 

On another note-I always thought he advertised as being straight. And looking at his Facebook the other day I thought he didn't sound very gay-friendly. So I wonder if being outed as a gay escort is going to cause him any problems

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gar1eth Grand Master

+ Gar1eth

Posted
Posted

In all the years Brodie has been advertising is it unusual that Brodie has never had a review on Daddys or even someone here on the Forum mention that they've seen him? Of course maybe someone on the Forum has seen him and hasn't mentioned it. He's been mentioned here repeatedly over the years due to his insane fees. And the fact that he was a less than inspired actor in his videos is usually brought up too which I've taken on faith as I've never seen any of his films. I can understand why the alleged client in question found him handsome as I've always thought he was attractive too. But it's really a shame the alleged client probably didn't know about Daddys or the Forum here. If he had, maybe he could have made a better choice. I'm sure these sites have protected me multiple times over the years.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gar1eth Grand Master

+ Gar1eth

Posted
Posted
So if the client were a Republican, a Tea Partyer, or a Mormon, then extortion is a perfectly acceptable course of behavior? Who died and made you judge, jury, and executioner?? I've said it a thousand times on this board, and I'll say it again: liberals live by one and only one principle - "how does this benefit ME?" The common joke amongst conservatives is that if liberals didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards. True to a point, but it misses the point: that today's American liberals are the most grotesquely selfish beings in the history of the human race. They don't care about a single person, thing, cause, or principle outside of their own selfish benefit. Liberals incessantly accuse Republicans of waging a "War On Women," yet when liberal Bill Maher calls Sarah Palin a CUNT on national television, not one single liberal in America was the least bit bothered by it. So apparently, according to liberals, misogyny is a horrible evil, unless of course the subject of the hatred is a conservative, then it's OK. Note that liberals, as always, threw principle out the window, because they only thing they cared about was their selfish benefit.

 

See, I believe that extortion is wrong, and it doesn't become justified or legitimate just because you disagree with someone's politics. But liberals apparently believe that extortion is only wrong if the victim is "innocent." If the victim is "guilty," that is, if his politics don't march in lockstep with Leftist Groupthink Headquarters, then extortion is okey dokey fine. Yet again, incontrovertible evidence that today's American liberals are the most selfish beings in the history of the human race.

 

 

Let me bring up three names for you for playing dirty-prominent Republicans all.

 

 

 

1. Lee Atwater

2. Karl Rove

3. The Duggars

 

People living in glass political party houses should not be throwing stones.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ArVaGuy Veteran

+ ArVaGuy

Posted
Posted

In retrospect, I was amazed how quickly the management at Gawker moved to pull the offending post down in less than 24 hours. The New York Post reports today that over $1 million in advertising was pulled, or placed on hold by various companies. Including Discovery Channel and BF Goodrich among them.

 

I would not be surprised if the client's brother, Tim Geithner, made a few phone calls or others on his behalf asked a few friends for assistance from business associates. Tim would have the connections and have a lot of favors he could call upon to make such a power play.

 

Gawker management acted faster than it ever has before to remove such an offensive post. In the past such has only been done due to litigation settlement or factual errors. Nick Denton has always had an aggressive posture in such matters prior to this incident. Looks like he got squeezed by a major power player. Gawker picked the wrong executive to mess with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Starbuck

Guest Starbuck

Posted
Posted
In retrospect, I was amazed how quickly the management at Gawker moved to pull the offending post down in less than 24 hours.

 

Alas, not before the details spread like a wildfire across the internet, not before both the story and the apparent selfie were archived. When your privacy is invaded in this day and age, it is compromised forever. The assholes at Gawker who ran the story fully understood that; they might even have anticipated the criticism. What they didn't count on was the financial backlash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kenny Grand Master

Kenny

Posted
Posted
So if the client were a Republican, a Tea Partyer, or a Mormon, then extortion is a perfectly acceptable course of behavior? Who died and made you judge, jury, and executioner?? I've said it a thousand times on this board, and I'll say it again: liberals live by one and only one principle - "how does this benefit ME?" The common joke amongst conservatives is that if liberals didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards. True to a point, but it misses the point: that today's American liberals are the most grotesquely selfish beings in the history of the human race. They don't care about a single person, thing, cause, or principle outside of their own selfish benefit. Liberals incessantly accuse Republicans of waging a "War On Women," yet when liberal Bill Maher calls Sarah Palin a CUNT on national television, not one single liberal in America was the least bit bothered by it. So apparently, according to liberals, misogyny is a horrible evil, unless of course the subject of the hatred is a conservative, then it's OK. Note that liberals, as always, threw principle out the window, because they only thing they cared about was their selfish benefit.

 

See, I believe that extortion is wrong, and it doesn't become justified or legitimate just because you disagree with someone's politics. But liberals apparently believe that extortion is only wrong if the victim is "innocent." If the victim is "guilty," that is, if his politics don't march in lockstep with Leftist Groupthink Headquarters, then extortion is okey dokey fine. Yet again, incontrovertible evidence that today's American liberals are the most selfish beings in the history of the human race.

 

Huh? In bringing up the War on Women, you equate school-yard name-calling (Bill Maher) with government officials passing legislation (say, Gov. Scott Walker, R-Wis., yesterday signing an unconstitutional anti-abortion bill to juice a fundraising tool). There's a name for that comparison: false equivalence. Right-wingers love it, because it's all they've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
azdr0710 Grand Master

+ azdr0710

Posted
Posted
A thought just occurred to me. Does anyone suppose the David Geithner scandal and the assistant looking for a high-end escort for their boss are related?

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/need-help-finding-a-ultra-high-end-escort-for-my-boss.105126/

 

ha!!.....interesting!....(and good memory!)

 

but I think (?) the assistant said his boss was some Wall Street type??.....maybe that was just a cover, though.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gar1eth Grand Master

+ Gar1eth

Posted
Posted
A thought just occurred to me. Does anyone suppose the David Geithner scandal and the assistant looking for a high-end escort for their boss are related?

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/need-help-finding-a-ultra-high-end-escort-for-my-boss.105126/

 

Good memory. But I doubt it. That guy -assuming the whole thread wasn't a hoax-was looking for an escort who didn't show his face and pretty much didn't advertise-or at least was discreet about advertising. Brodie's face has been out there for years. Plus he was a pornstar. If the guy was for real, I'm sorry he wasn't into Arek, Ares, or Alec.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruHart1 Grand Master

TruHart1

Posted
Posted
A thought just occurred to me. Does anyone suppose the David Geithner scandal and the assistant looking for a high-end escort for their boss are related?

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/threads/need-help-finding-a-ultra-high-end-escort-for-my-boss.105126/

I too thought about that but it's a stretch if most of what that straight personal assistant posted about his boss was factual. As stated, Brodie always showed his face and stated he'd been a porn star in every ad! Gman, Alec shows his face in his ads now so that disqualified him and, as I recall, Alec posted the idea for himself being hired to lighten the thread a bit!

 

TruHart1 :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FreshFluff Grand Master

+ FreshFluff

Posted
Posted

I got the sense that the boss discussed in that thread was an older gentleman. Just a hunch.

 

Also, Daneeo said that about a fifth of regular newspaper readers would recognize his boss' name; that the boss is worth around half a billion; that he has a private entrance to exclusive stores; and that he's never been to Target. Doesn't sound like the Conde Nast guy at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Contact Info:

The Company of Men
5834 C. North Kings Hwy #4343
Alexandria, VA 22303

Email: moderators@companyofmen.org

Help Support Our Site

Our site operates with the support of our members. Make a one-time donation using the buttons below.

$10 $25 $50 $100 $200

Make a recurring donation

Additional Resources

×
×
  • Create New...