Russ makes it a very good Friday

[+ purplekow]

I have not been able to hire Russ for the last few months due to the weather here in the NE and difficulties for me to commute to Brooklyn. However, today's picture, shows that he is getting better looking and more muscular and at least in this picture, sexier by the day. Jesus rose again on the third day. Today's picture of Russ made me rise again and again, Need to get to Brooklyn to get the goodies from his basket. Would love to be next to him and to hear him growl: Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise"

[+ azdr0710]

and he'll be here all weekend....nice!

[RSully94]

You're talking about the Coverboy right? Ugh, shame he's on the other coast. That picture of him with his nipple hanging out is so hot!

[barkis]

I saw his coverboy photo and would love to see more. Does he have an ad up somewhere? I can't seem to find!

 

**edit** found it! http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=387012

[bostonman]

I met Russ this past November, when I was in NYC for the weekend. (My review is the most current one on Daddy's - review #11.) Really good at what he does, and such a nice, playful, friendly guy as well, who really seems to love his profession. I am definitely going to try to see him again the next time I'm in New York.

[+ Robster]

Wow, that is one hot man! I love redheads, always have. Especially when they're as handsome and muscular as he is!

 

Rob

[TruthBTold]

He is someone I would love to show a good time and vice versa. I will have to make it to NYC.

[+ purplekow]

TruthBTold Great avatar.

[TruthBTold]

Thanks, PK. I congratulate you that you have had the opportunity of being with Russ. Hope you have more time to play with him and let us know how it goes.

[+ azdr0710]

Met with Russ for a second time a few days ago during a visit out east. He's bigger now, but still low-key, accommodating, and uninhibited. Still has that razor-sharp wit, too. Review is to be written.

[mike carey]

Thanks for reminding me of him, @azdr0710!

[+ WmClarke]

Does he have a current ad?

[Gar1eth]

Met with Russ for a second time a few days ago during a visit out east. He's bigger now, but still low-key, accommodating, and uninhibited. Still has that razor-sharp wit, too. Review is to be written.

Did he shower?

 

Gman

[CatnameFelix]

Met with Russ for a second time a few days ago during a visit out east. He's bigger now, but still low-key, accommodating, and uninhibited. Still has that razor-sharp wit, too. Review is to be written.

 

Uninhibited? I guess there's no truth in advertising, lol.

[rvwnsd]

Uninhibited? I guess there's no truth in advertising, lol.

I don't understand why you think there is no truth in his advertising. Nowhere in his ad does he state he limits the activities he performs nor does it state he is inhibited.

[CatnameFelix]

I don't understand why you think there is no truth in his advertising. Nowhere in his ad does he state he limits the activities he performs nor does it state he is inhibited.

I always took uninhibited to equal barebacking, and his ad says safe only.

[rvwnsd]

I always took uninhibited to equal barebacking, and his ad says safe only.

In this case, that assumption is not valid. I know the poster who stated Russ is uninhibited. He does not get into anal. At all.

[bostonman]

I always took uninhibited to equal barebacking, and his ad says safe only.

 

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. (That is, sometimes "uninhibited" can actually mean what it meant before the era of HIV, which was to have no inhibitions in general - not meaning that it was code for a certain sexual practice.)

 

That said, I assume he knows the slang well enough - if he doesn't mean to imply barebacking, perhaps he should change that word.

 

(Foe a while, I had a screenname on a hookup site that used "bb" in the name - not to mean bareback, but just as a spelling variant for one "b." When I started getting responses assuming I did bareback, I realized I needed to change the screenname, lol.)

[CatnameFelix]

In this case, that assumption is not valid. I know the poster who stated Russ is uninhibited. He does not get into anal. At all.

Got you, my mistake.

[bostonman]

Oh - actually my mistake too. Somehow I got confused and thought that it was Russ who was using the word "uninhibited" when it was actually the poster here. Never mind...

 

But, also having been with Russ (about a year and a half ago), I will attest to the fact that he is definitely wonderfully "uninhibited" in a non-bareback, non-dangerous way. And I would definitely recommend him as well. (I have a review up for him.)

[+ azdr0710]

I suppose uninhibited may mean bareback in some backroom bathhouse parlance, I guess, but I only meant Russ is entirely comfortable and confident when messing around. I don't use code and subtle and deceptive I ain't.

[rvwnsd]

Thinking about the words guys use when asking about escorts, such as "limits," "boundaries," and "inhibitions" I can't see how one could assure someone that an escort was not limited, inhibited, or hemmed in by boundaries without using someone's code word for fucking without a condom.

[BabyBoomer]

In this case, that assumption is not valid. I know the poster who stated Russ is uninhibited. He does not get into anal. At all.

 

Are you 100% sure the poster you know does not get into anal, at all?

 

~Boomer ~

[+ WmClarke]

Thinking about the words guys use when asking about escorts, such as "limits," "boundaries," and "inhibitions" I can't see how one could assure someone that an escort was not limited, inhibited, or hemmed in by boundaries without using someone's code word for fucking without a condom.

That makes no sense. Conversations about limits, boundaries, and inhibitions are not just about bare backing.

 

Or am I misunderstanding your point?

[mike carey]

That makes no sense. Conversations about imits, boundaries, and inhibitions are not just about bare backing.

 

Or am I misunderstanding your point?

I don't think you are missing the point. I read it to mean that if you talk about those things, the words you use will be someone else's code for barebacking (or euphsmisms for something else that you didn't intend them to mean). I don't think, though, that if you are using the words in their normal sense it is your responsibility to say that you are using them literally. Coded language probably should be used in quotes or only with people the writer knows will read them as code.