Two-guy appointment - what are your expectations?

[+ poolboy48220]

I've only hired two guys at once a few times. There have been a couple of times where it hasn't been much of all three of us playing, that it's more of a tag-team. I'll be playing around with one guy, and the other guy is over on the edge of the bed, either just watching & commenting, or ... well, not sure what he's doing, because my face is buried someplace else. :-) And then they trade out. Not sure if there's an actual tag-in involved.

 

Is this anyone else's experience? It's not universal, there have been some sessions where all three of us are actively rolling around and participating for the full session. These are, with only one exception, guys advertising as a duo, so I'm guessing it's not a matter of lack of chemistry between the two of them.

 

It seems like a waste of money if it's basically a one-guy session but the guys alternate, for twice the price. Has anyone else experienced this, and would you find it less than what you expected? After the last time, I figured if I do hire two again, I'll make sure I ask if I'm getting the full time with each guy.

[Stagger]

I know exactly what you mean! I have had a couple of threesomes and you are right on, if the two escorts don't have chemistry, then it is like doing two consecutive sessions. I like watching the two guys with each other and me being the filling in the cookie. When it works, it is just awesome!

[Diverdan]

I guess I have been fortunate. My three somes have been excellent, with one only moderately so. In every case, I started with someone whom I had been with before and added someone to the mix that the first guy either knew and had worked with before, or thought it would be great fun. You are right that it can be tricky, but I was also explicit in my communications with both in terms of what I expected. I also usually started with the guy I had been with before for a 30 minute warm up and massage and then the second person joined us. You are right that it does take some chemistry between all three of us to make it an exceptional time, but that has never seemed to be a problem. I don't think I would ever hire two unless they come as a pair or I have worked with at least one of them in the past. In a couple of cases, introducing a second guy to the mix that neither I nor the first guy that I knew added a lot of spice and made for an excellent time. It can be an incredible experience when it works well... so, again, I think that communication is a key part of it becoming a successful experience for all.

[leigh.bess.toad]

I've done more than my share of 3 way (and more) hires and with only one exception, they've all be off-the-charts incredible. I guess the question is, are these guys that you've hired separately before? How well do you know them (and they, you?). On my multiple hires, I know the guys really well individually, so it really is more a gathering of friends. I'm putting together guys who may know each other anyway (since it's a small circle anyway), or guys who I believe will work really well together (knowing their sexual and personality tastes). It always seems to end up being a game of "can you top this", sexually at least. Which is always fun.

 

I think maybe just throwing two guys together who have never worked together and who both don't know you may be a disadvantage if that is the situation. So maybe a bit of clarification from the OP might lend a info on the background of the problem or situations. Because I have never had the situation you described at all

[+ Gar1eth]

I'm kind of awkward at sex- that being said- the two or 3 - threesomes I've arranged have been ok. The failure I feel has been my fault. I think part of it- goes along with what I said in another thread a few weeks ago. I don't lose myself in sex the way some people do. There are lots of reasons for this- things like 1) I live in my head a lot- I can't just turn it off; 2) even the best sex for me- there's usually some bit that while not exactly hurting may feel a little uncomfortable; 3). I am one of the least 'go with the flow' do what comes naturally guy out there- my piano teacher used to tell me you don't have to count every measure- just feel the rhythm. Well I don't feel rhythm. 4). Then there are just my physical limitations as being an out of shape 52 year old who only had sex for the 1st time 10 years ago- is on the 'small' side - and is only comfortable with only some limited sexual acts.

 

So if I feel a little left out, it's really more my fault. I will say- that when I've had the privilege of being with two guys- it's been really a pleasure to see some guys who know what they are doing, and whose bodies were made more for sex than mine was- so a pleasure- and a bit of wistfulness.

 

Gman

[Decatur Guy]

I hire a lot more one on one than in threesomes, but most of those threesomes have been good.

 

Everyone takes their own thoughts and experiences into a threeway, but for me, a two top / one bottom set-up tends to bring a lot of success because:

 

A. You can still have a good encounter even if the tops aren't totally into each other. If they are both into the bottom guy, it can still work pretty well. (Now if the two top guys are totally turned off by each other, that's another story).

 

B. Physically speaking, that combo is the easiest to keep all three people active in the scene at the same time for the longest amount of time.

 

I think the most off-the-charts threeways I've had are when three versatile guys are all into each other. But it's also been my experience that's a less likely to happen.

 

I've been in threeways (non-hiring situations) where I was the top with two bottoms. In theory, that seems like it should have been terrific -- fucking one ass and then on to the other, then back and forth. But it doesn't seem to translate for me in actuality.

 

There's something about one bottom serving two tops that just turns my crank -- whether I'm the bottom or one of the tops.

[+ Axiom2001]

I've been fortunate to have had two stellar 3WAYS. Both happened in Buenos Aires a few years back when I got with Chorch and Esteban Leon. Damn! Damn! Damn!

...an experience I'll always remember. Read their reviews of this experience at this site. Their reviews might be interactive, but you'll get a sense what this was like for

me. One of these days I truly hope to re-experience what I underwent with both Chorch {Jorge} and Esteban Leon {Sebastian}. To date I consider them amigos of mine.

 

If I manage to get with two guys for a "scorching three way," I want lots of interactivity in all events amongst the three of us.

[seeker630]

I've had mixed resaults with threesomes, although I really like them. I've only hired guys who worked together, with two exceptions (and that was with an agency recommendation).

 

As with most sessions, I think it's important to make your expectations/requirements known explicitly before the session begins - and to know what you want!. I expect oral service from one or preferably both, and I want to see one top the other. I like 'spit-roasting'. In the best sessions, both guys will make sure to involve you (unless you've indicated you just want to stand aside & watch). (I fondly remember JC Cortez pulling me to his mouth while I watched Patrick Bogan pound him.)

 

But one a few occasions, I have felt ignored - and I had the feeling one-on-one sessions with the guy(s) wouldn't have been so great either!

[Phil_musc]

Goodness, I feel like such a young, inexperienced innocent here amongst you men of the world. My threesome hires I can count on one hand but there have been numerous threesomes in the non-commercial vein. Those have ranged from pleasant diversion to outright fireworks. In the world of commerce, I guess I'd have to summarize as "it all depends. . . " I've had disappointing encounters and incredible experiences. I think it largely has to do with where my head is at while at the circus. Like Gman, I tend to live in my head a lot (although I've been working at this) and threesomes really are best if you can just give yourself over to the animalistic experience of the moment. As I've matured, I have found that the decadence of the multi-participant encounter to be enjoyable because it is so different from how I see myself. But I guess ultimately I prefer the connection of a one-on-one experience. I'd rather focus on one guy and me rather than thinking about how to involve all the players.

[Jaker27]

I've had some awesome threesomes. Total fantasy experiences. Personally, i'm pretty darn good at them because deep down I'm a pleaser kind of guy with no ego to get in the way. If I can't beat em in the hottter, bigger, better department then i just say fuck it might as well join in and have fun too. I'll just be someones bitch I guess.

 

I have to agree with the others though. Getting to know them one on one is good way to determine but not always. Of coarse just putting it out there in your first email. You should know within minutes whether or not they'd be compatible. I'd also say if they make big deal on the price probably not a good idea either. They should be driven on lust. Allot of guys just aren't made for it for whatever reason.

 

All this talk has me thinking about it for myself now too. It's been quite awhile:(

[Xander]

Oh man, I'm sorry you don't have good experience with threesomes. It really takes two good escorts to pull it off... everyone should be involved at all times, and everyone should be enjoying themselves! When James and I see clients together we make it a priority to make sure that clients never feel 'left out', or that they are the ones initiating everything. We almost throw ourselves completely and totally at the client for an entire hour - its a lot more fun for me, too

[tyro]

And once again X, you left the camera off..............

T

[leigh.bess.toad]

We almost throw ourselves completely and totally at the client for an entire hour

 

Which raises the question for the guys doing 3 ways (or more): how long are your sessions typically for: an hour, 2, multiple hours, overnight, weekends? Out of curiosity. For research purposes only, mind you.

[+ Gar1eth]

Personally, i'm pretty darn good at them because deep down I'm a pleaser kind of guy with no ego to get in the way. If I can't beat em in the hottter, bigger, better department then i just say fuck it might as well join in and have fun too. I'll just be someones bitch I guess.

 

Jaker, nice to see you back contributing again. It's been too long

 

. I do have one question about something you just stated . I mean really I have to laugh. I cant even imagine in what universe someone was actually 'bigger- more endowed than you'? I'm also wondering how anyone could possibly be any hotter than you.

 

I'm getting the feeling you are too modest for your own good.

 

 

Gman

[+ purplekow]

i have had threeways which have been terrific but now and then I have had disappointments. The disappointments usually resulted from my not being active enough in assuring that I had a good time. One in particular, i arranged a three way with two escorts I had seen before individually and who had worked together with a nice review from Mr, Okie. For an overnight, the sex play was adequate during the evening and then there was nothing in the morning. I look back and shoulder most of the responsibility as I did not encourage the activity, I guess i expected two hot escorts with whom I had good experiences would show me that same good time In fact, they spent a great deal of the time talking and catching up. This turned into a disappointing and expensive event.

Since then, I have not hired either of the escorts again.

I have not had an overnight threeway since then and if I was interested in a threeway again, I would have it during the evening and then send one home and spend the rest of my time with the other recreating the highlights of the event.

 

One other issue with threeways is that I have had several in which one guy was clearly more in tune with me sexually and it becaume something of an effort to keep the third included.

 

No doubt threeways are juggling acts in which keeping all the balls in the air is a challenge.

[Xander]

Which raises the question for the guys doing 3 ways (or more): how long are your sessions typically for: an hour, 2, multiple hours, overnight, weekends? Out of curiosity. For research purposes only, mind you.

 

An hour. Its almost not enough time!

[Decatur Guy]

I usually do 90 minutes or maybe two hours. I've done this a few times: Hire one escort for two or three hours and then bring in the second one for one hour to 90 minutes.

[Jaker27]

Jaker, nice to see you back contributing again. It's been too long

 

. I do have one question about something you just stated . I mean really I have to laugh. I cant even imagine in what universe someone was actually 'bigger- more endowed than you'? I'm also wondering how anyone could possibly be any hotter than you.

 

I'm getting the feeling you are too modest for your own good.

 

 

Gman

Ah shucks. Thank you. I'm so glad I have someone that noticed:) I'm not much of a contributer though. Just a long term "very opinionated" fly on the wall.

 

I usually end up with guys that like certain attributes so it's not uncommon to find myself with guys who are hung like horses and sometimes bigger then me. On more then one occasion I've partnered with Barret Long for example.

 

It's a fine line between being an arrogant asshole and just being confident that you have something to add to the situation. Modesty works for me though and is allot less trouble. Only one person at a time is allowed an ego at a party.

[Jaker27]

I usually do 90 minutes or maybe two hours. I've done this a few times: Hire one escort for two or three hours and then bring in the second one for one hour to 90 minutes.

Yup..perfect. A little time to get to know each other first and more then enough to umm entertain.

[bigvalboy]

Ah shucks. Thank you. I'm so glad I have someone that noticed:) I'm not much of a contributer though. Just a long term "very opinionated" fly on the wall.

 

I usually end up with guys that like certain attributes so it's not uncommon to find myself with guys who are hung like horses and sometimes bigger then me. On more then one occasion I've partnered with Barret Long for example.

 

It's a fine line between being an arrogant asshole and just being confident that you have something to add to the situation. Modesty works for me though and is allot less trouble. Only one person at a time is allowed an ego at a party.

 

I just got a hard on reading your post...you are a bad bad boy Mr. Jaker....

[Bosguy]

I just got a hard on reading your post...you are a bad bad boy Mr. Jaker....

 

The thread was about "What are your expectations?" Your response is just a generalized bs statement that does not answer the question. Do you have a real fact based opinion?

 

Boston Bill

[TopAz]

I've never had a 3-some with two escorts at the same time, but after reading this thread, I'm intrigued, enticed and really want to try it.