Asian men

[Guest JT]

RE: Cauasian men

 

>>"I think an Asian with a big piece would be very hot, but

>>wonder if such a thing exists."

>>

>>>I saw nothing racist about his question.

>>

>>Rick, well I guess you see nothing wrong to call any human

>>being "a thing", regardless of their race then?

>

>He's not calling an Asian a thing - he's calling a big cock a

>thing.

>Now what you you call it?

>

>Sorry to hear your English skills are so limited.

>

>fukamarine

 

LOL! Sorry to SEE (not hear) the one with poor English and reading comprehension skills is you. If the first poster used the word "thing" to only refer to a "big cock", then why would he ask that question in the first place? He had to ask whether a big cock exists out there? Now that would make a lot of sense, right? As I said earlier, I do find a Cauasian man with a brain very hot but I'm sorry to tell you that you're not one of them.

 

JT

[taylorky]

well 4 what ever it's worth,and with undenied limited experience.....i find us little guys (5'9" and under) have bigger dicks than the bigger guys (5'10" and up).of course not a scientific study by any stretch,just my observation...........taylorasalwaysmodestly@23:22-04/06/03

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

>well 4 what ever it's worth,and with undenied limited

>experience.....i find us little guys (5'9" and under) have

>bigger dicks than the bigger guys (5'10" and up).

 

gosh........... I always wanted to be taller. Now if find out that I was too tall all along. And the evidence was there all the time -- I just never knew that 2+2 added to 6. ;(

 

:+

[Guest BenAJ]

A lot of times what is being said can be the same but what makes it "racist" is the intent behind the words. Honestly, I didn't find what the original poster said as being "racist." It did refer to a stereotype but in my opinion, he was at least asking a question, so he was making an attempt at not just accepting the stereotype at face value.

 

One of the points of these site is to "educate" so he learned something knew today....

 

As to the fact that he likes big cocks, so he is a size...queen. Nothing wrong with that if that is what he prefers...now if only we can find a big cocked asian escort to educate him in person....:9

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Nice ass Ben }(

[Guest]

I seem to remember reading an actual scientific study on the subject a number of years ago. I seem to remember the differences being real, but not as much as many people think. I seem to remember the averages being along the lines of 6" for Asians, 6 1/2" for whites, and 7" for blacks.

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Cauasian men

 

>Rick, well I guess you see nothing wrong to call any human

>being "a thing", regardless of their race then?

 

I have no problem with that. Now you're just nitpicking about semantics and trying to create intentions that aren't there. He used the word "thing" as a figure of speech...it was obviously not in an attempt to refer to Asians as inanimate objects. You're being silly.

[Rick Munroe]

>Well excuse, me Mary Magdalene but who cares?

 

Judging by your histrionic replies to this thread, you do. And the name-calling is really childish.

[Guest fukamarine]

RE: Cauasian men

 

"As I said earlier, I do find a Cauasian man with

>a brain very hot but I'm sorry to tell you that you're not one

>of them.

 

Oh you cruel, cruel man. You've wounded me to the core and left me bloodied, battered and boo-hooing

 

May we all bow down to your superior intellect!

 

fukamarine

[Guest fukamarine]

>I seem to remember reading an actual scientific study on the

>subject a number of years ago. I seem to remember the

>differences being real, but not as much as many people think.

>I seem to remember the averages being along the lines of 6"

>for Asians, 6 1/2" for whites, and 7" for blacks.

 

Well there you go! Proves my point entirely.

 

fukamarine

[Guest JT]

RE: Cauasian men

 

>Oh you cruel, cruel man. You've wounded me to the core and

>left me bloodied, battered and boo-hooing

>

>May we all bow down to your superior intellect!

>

 

Well fukamarine, we Vancouverites can sure give and take. I'm sure if you can fuck a marine, you can take care of yourself fine. Part of the "fun" here is to be able to agree to disagree.

 

I venture into the discussion on the MC once a while not to look for people bowing down to me or to hurt anyone, but like some here, speak out when I feel the need to do so. My past posts and perhaps some of the other "oldie" posters can testify to that.

 

Rick and I have crossed paths here (in the MC or private emails) several times in the past and I think in all cases, we've been supportive and respectful of each other. There's nothing personal against Rick or you in my posts, what I'm trying to point out is that no one race in this world deserves to be called a "thing" and the fallacy of over-generalization.

 

JT

[Guest JT]

RE: Cauasian men

 

>I have no problem with that. Now you're just nitpicking about

>semantics and trying to create intentions that aren't there.

>He used the word "thing" as a figure of speech...it was

>obviously not in an attempt to refer to Asians as inanimate

>objects. You're being silly.

 

This may well be your interpretation Rick and you're surely entitled to call me silly. Interesting enough, when I supported you in the past when you're attacked in the MC (e.g. for not returning the deposit of $ 1200 to a client), you didn't say I was just "nitpicking about semantics and trying to create intentions that aren't there." For that, you even gave me a positive rating, commenting that I'm your hero. When Truth Teller and I pointed out the fallacy made by some posters regarding the spread of HCV by the fecal-oral route, I didn't recall you calling me silly neither.

 

I guess the difference this time is when I'm trying to point out that you may be on the wrong side of the fence, I have the honour of being labelled by you with all kinds of negative attributes.

 

 

JT

[axebahia]

>I seem to remember reading an actual scientific study on the

>subject a number of years ago.

 

Do you mean psuedo-scientific? Actually, I think the studies show that size/width vary with the size of the individuals involved just like fingers, hands, toes and feet. (Think about it, could you imagine if it were otherwise as a general rule?) Trying to correlate "race" or "ethnicity" to penis size has long been a fascination for racists, but is is almost impossible to do a serious scientific study in this area because it is hard to control for variation within the race or ethnicity, assuming one could even come to a common understanding of how to allocate individuals in to particular races or ethnicities especially in a heterogenous gene pools.

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Cauasian men

 

>Interesting enough, when I

>supported you in the past...you

>didn't say I was just "nitpicking about semantics and trying

>to create intentions that aren't there." ... I

>didn't recall you calling me silly neither.

 

Right, because in those instances, I felt that you demonstrated logic & reason. In this current case, I don't think you are & frankly, it surprised me. I did say, "you're being silly", not "you are silly." Semantically, there's a difference.

 

>I guess the difference this time is when I'm trying to point

>out that you may be on the wrong side of the fence, I have the

>honour of being labelled by you with all kinds of negative

>attributes.

 

A single statement of "you're being silly" is now considered "all kinds of negative attributes"? You don't think you're blowing this out of proportion just a bit? If I hurt your feelings, I'm sorry about that; it wasn't my intention. However, I think that branding pierrot a racist simply because, as BenAJ mentioned below, he inquired about a stereotype is a much more serious label than "silly."

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Cauasian men

 

>what I'm

>trying to point out is that no one race in this world deserves

>to be called a "thing"

 

The guy didn't say "all Asians are things"...he was using a figure of speech. It all comes down to how you choose to interpret it. Franco refers to my boyfriend as "the slab of beef"...should Derek be insulted? Would you call Shakespeare a man-hating bull-dyke because he has Hamlet say, "What a piece of work is man!"?

[+ Charlie]

As I read through the more heated replies in this thread, I began to wonder if I had missed something in the original post, so I went back to it. All I could find was a statement that the poster was attracted to Asian men, but had not seen any with large cocks, and wanted to know if we could recommend an Asian escort with a big dick. That doesn't sound racist to me, though it does sound dickist.

 

So to respond to your original query, I can't think of any East Asians I have slept with whose cocks were either large or small--they all seemed about average, including the only Asian escort I have hired, a 5'10" muscular Japanese. As to your second post, I have had sex with a couple of really hot South Asians, who had fairly large cocks, but I have no idea whether they were typical, since one hardly ever sees South Asian cocks. I think you are right in your suggestion that cultural inhibitions prevent them from working in the sex industry in this country, where most of them are first or second generation, but one does find Indian and Pakistani escorts in Britain, especially in London, where they have been assimilated for a longer time.

[Guest gentle guy]

Going back to the original question...

Tommy Tam of Texas was discussed here a few months ago, but never reviewed. Seems very attractive and nicely sized!

http://www.tommytx.com

[Guest BenAJ]

Thanks...

 

It may be nice but it is often very bad!!! }(

[Rick Munroe]

>It may be nice but it is often very bad!!!

 

It is cute...what's the hole like? }(

[pierrot]

Well as I expected the political correctness police lost no time in condemning me as a racist for even mentioning race. Americans typically get so nervous at the mere mention of race that their knee jerk reaction is to suspect the one who brought it up has a concealed racist attitude. It's such a ridiculous and boring reaction that I don't even care to pursue it.

Others of you quite clearly answered my question that indeed you have had experiences of well-endowed Asians, and one even sent a URL of an escort. That's really what I was asking about. So thanks.

I was also interested in taylor's message about short guys with big cocks. Just to touch on other generalized observations from my own experience, it does seem to be true that tall guys are not better hung. Gay men have long sought some outward sign of what lies beneath the zipper, but neither hand size, nor foot size, nor height, nor--it seems--race are good predicters as far as I know.

Am I a size queen? I think big dicks are hot. And given what I see advertised by escorts, I think most gay men agree. Of course, if using the epithet "size queen" makes someone feel good about their own much higher moral ground, I'm happy to accept the label.

Thanks to Rick and the rest of you with sane responses.

[+ Lucky]

"Well as I expected the political correctness police lost no time in condemning me as a racist for even mentioning race."

 

Well, at least you've dropped the pretense that it was an innocent post and revealed that you wrote it in a way to draw a response other than to your question. You are probably the same person who posted this question a few months ago with the same sly dig at Asian men whom you purport to admire.

 

In my opinion, you are an asshole. Happy posting.

[Guest ortrud45]

Congratulations Pierrot for your classy post: I second every last word of it and especially the part where you put those over-sensitive guys of the US-racist-police in place ... three thumbs up!

 

As to Lucky:

sorry, but this time you are definitely wrong and name-calling gives no additional weight or credit to your opinion.}(

 

To all: have a pleasant day, ortrud45

[Rick Munroe]

>Well, at least you've dropped the pretense that it was an

>innocent post and revealed that you wrote it in a way to draw

>a response other than to your question.

 

Huh? That's not what he's saying at all. Expecting a certain response is not the same as intentionally seeking that response. You guys are really getting out of hand with this twisting of other people's words. It just makes you look foolish.

[Rick Munroe]

>Congratulations Pierrot for your classy post: I second every

>last word of it and especially the part where you put those

>over-sensitive guys of the US-racist-police in place ... three

>thumbs up!

 

Add my thumbs to that. It was a sane & intelligent response.

[+ Lucky]

Guys, i fell for this one hook, line and sinker. Only after Pierrot's last post did it hit me. I had beem wondering why Rick Munroe was all over this thread like a fly to shit when I realized that he is in fact Pierrot! Not the first time Rick has created another name to post under!