Glutes and other Random Forum Thoughts

[maxwellissmart]

I hate when threads are locked because I'm always late to the party and then I can't add my smartass 2¢.

 

How ironic—I started to post this exact thread the other day and figured it would get locked down, so why bother.

[Decatur Guy]

http://timfowlar.com/Joanne%20Worley.jpg

[bigvalboy]

I actually was gone that day and I honestly do not remember the details. I do not really want to speculate here. I will get the particulars from Glutes and I will PM you, or I will post.

[+ Cash4Trash]

I've been involved is chat rooms that flamed out because of the increasing vitriol of the members posting. The boards have long ago disappeared.

This forum continues to thrive and I feel that is, in part, to the moderators putting the brakes on a thread that threatens to get out of hand.

 

When the anger and insults get personal and out of control a good number of the members will walk away leaving the board to the few bullies.

Daddy and the moderators are making the correct call. Longevity of this forum is the proof.

[citylaw1]

Daddy and the moderators are making the correct call. Longevity of this forum is the proof.

 

I question the members and their outcries for Daddy, and thread closure, far more that I question moderator intervention. It just baffles me that guys can hire escorts, yet they are thrown over the top by anonymous postings.

[seeker630]

I question the members and their outcries for Daddy, and thread closure, far more that I question moderator intervention. It just baffles me that guys can hire escorts, yet they are thrown over the top by anonymous postings.

 

I still don't see what one has to do with the other? What characteristics do you extrapolate from the fact that someone hires esorts?

 

Members here hire different types, for different reasons & want different experiences, so why would you expect them all to have the same views on the behavior here?

 

We are a diverse group.

[instudiocity]

That's ridiculous. What did did he do to warrant that?

Per the Terms of Service: He ignored a warning provided to him privately from the moderators.

POSTING PRIVILEGES

 

All are welcome to join us and post here, without restriction. However, we must and do reserve the right to modify or delete any post or thread that violates these rules or is, in our sole opinion, inappropriate for inclusion in these shared conversations. Posters who violate a rule will receive a warning from the moderators via their private inbox or by email. Second and third violations will result in a suspension of posting privileges for 30 days. Posters who have violated the rules more than three times will have their usernames deactivated permanently.

 

If you feel a post violates the rules, please click on the ALERT link at the bottom of the offending post. The moderators will be notified and will review the post as soon as possible. If the post does violate the rules, the moderators will take whatever action is deemed appropriate. Please send an ALERT instead of a private e-mail when you feel action is required. An ALERT will reach the first available moderator while an e-mail will wait until that individual next comes online.

[+ Lucky]

Speaking for myself - the bickering (as differentiated from civil discussions and disgreement) interferes with my enjoyment of the board. Obviously that isn't true for everyone, but it IS true for a significant number of posters, I think. And the VALUE of the information shared here is diminished when you have to winnow it out from the chaff of personal squabbles.

 

Since 2004 I have noticed that bickering burns itself out when ignored. Members are able to moderate on their own for the most part.

 

Since your sign up date is 2009, I guess that you have used a different screen name. or perhaps you are referring to different sites. Your real complaint seems to be that the rules here cramp your style, which leads to the question as to why you can't adapt or find another site.

[orbital sander]

Per the Terms of Service: He ignored a warning provided to him privately from the moderators.

 

And he has been put on "vacation" several times.

[citylaw1]

Since your sign up date is 2009, I guess that you have used a different screen name. or perhaps you are referring to different sites. Your real complaint seems to be that the rules here cramp your style, which leads to the question as to why you can't adapt or find another site.

 

Again, I have never mentioned the rules. I have mentioned the attitude of certain members. While I may be in the minority (although I bet not), there are several posters here that agree with my logic. I believe that I have adapted just fine.

[citylaw1]

I still don't see what one has to do with the other? What characteristics do you extrapolate from the fact that someone hires esorts?

 

Members here hire different types, for different reasons & want different experiences, so why would you expect them all to have the same views on the behavior here?

 

We are a diverse group.

 

 

Diverse indeed, however, if you can handle the intricacies of hiring escorts (hookers), you most certainly can withstand the taunts and jabs from avatars. At a minimum, you should be able to ignore said comments without screaming for the hall monitor.

[citylaw1]

Since your sign up date is 2009, I guess that you have used a different screen name. or perhaps you are referring to different sites. Your real complaint seems to be that the rules here cramp your style, which leads to the question as to why you can't adapt or find another site.

 

2009 was my rebirth ... a celebration of maturity.

[citylaw1]

Per the Terms of Service: He ignored a warning provided to him privately from the moderators.

 

What was the warning for? I don't see any violation that warrants suspension. That being said, I don't pay the bills.

[orbital sander]

What was the warning for? I don't see any violation that warrants suspension. That being said, I don't pay the bills.

 

Boy, You and JJ definitely do have one thing in common...

[oz_carter]

Nicely said.

 

Boy, You and JJ definitely do have one thing in common...

[citylaw1]

Boy, You and JJ definitely do have one thing in common...

 

I don't violate rules, and I post with etiquette and thought. I argue with logic, rather than anger. I also can admit when I'm wrong. A quality that is lacking here.

[instudiocity]

What was the warning for? I don't see any violation that warrants suspension. That being said, I don't pay the bills.

Reading comprehension? "... warning from the moderators via their private inbox or by email. Second and third violations will result in a suspension of posting privileges for 30 days." I dare say, we aren't privy to other's private communications.

[citylaw1]

Nicely said.

 

What do you offer this forum sir? I have written several reviews and provided information on numerous occasions here. I even test the new meat when others don't, and provide information publicly and privately to those who are interested.

[citylaw1]

Boy, You and JJ definitely do have one thing in common...

 

JJ isn't always capable of seeing things, as hard as he may try. I always see them, but don't always agree with what I see.

[instudiocity]

2009 was my rebirth ... a celebration of maturity.

Meh!

 

Boy, You and JJ definitely do have one thing in common...

Yup, Yup!

 

Nicely said.

Right-O!

 

I don't violate rules, and I post with etiquette and thought. I argue with logic, rather than anger. I also can admit when I'm wrong. A quality that is lacking here.

Psst! Sometimes when one speaks of oneself he causes himself to appear arrogant. Oh, and judge not, for so shall you too be judged. Just saying what's good for the lawyer is good for the prisoner.

JJ isn't always capable of seeing things, as hard as he may try. I always see them, but don't always agree with what I see.

I see!

[seeker630]

Boy, You and JJ definitely do have one thing in common...

 

More than one!

[inheat75]

What do you offer this forum sir? I have written several reviews and provided information on numerous occasions here. I even test the new meat when others don't, and provide information publicly and privately to those who are interested.

 

Maybe it's just me, but it is not about how much you can offer this forum. We come here for a variety of reasons. We thank people who post reviews and provide information, but we are not compelled or should not be compelled to do the same just because you have. Some members are prolific posters while others just take a back seat.

 

You were showing your arrogance when you pointed out your contributions to this forum (400 plus) compared to the other member who had less than 50.

[citylaw1]

Reading comprehension? "... warning from the moderators via their private inbox or by email. Second and third violations will result in a suspension of posting privileges for 30 days." I dare say, we aren't privy to other's private communications.

 

So you are assuming that he received emails from moderators. You have no direct knowledge (that you have shared) of this. What were the warnings for? You have answered no questions here.

[citylaw1]

Its not a question of who gets to decide; we all know that answer. The owner.

 

But if the question is quality, then to me the answer is obvious. Glutes added enormous content to this board. It is less fun without him here.

 

Agreed.

[citylaw1]

Per the Terms of Service: He ignored a warning provided to him privately from the moderators.

 

How do you KNOW that he ignored a warning sent to him PRIVATELY?