Jump to content

Mapping penis size in europe


jjkrkwood
This topic is 4989 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted
Looks like the Romanians are Eastern Europe's biggest losers in more ways than one.

 

I was expecting the Iberians to log the biggest logs.

 

But the Romanians DO have the best, juiciest Strip steaks.....

Posted
But the Romanians DO have the best, juiciest Strip steaks.....

 

I always thought the Romanians were supposed to have long schlongs, like their brethen Italians. I wonder what went wrong?

Posted

Here's a link to a similar map of the world:

 

http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073

 

 

I have to say these maps seem to be rather consistent with my personal experiences and sightings ... along with the stereotypes you hear in general.

 

I guess the big cocks in Latin countries must come from the native populations and Africans, because the Iberians don't have particularly large cocks, according to these maps.

Posted

Is this some sort of Saturday Night Live sketch waiting to happen or what? Before we take this scholarly study too much to heart, I suggest some healthy skepticism on several points:

1) How many subjects were "studied" and "sampled" within each country? Did people sign up or just show up to have their dongs measured? What kind of publicity was there to get the best cross-sectioning?

2) Who conducted the study itself and what special qualifications did the examiners have that qualified them for such an august assignment?- (side note: why was I not at least given the opportunity to help with the extensive field work clearly necessary? I love to travel and sample new things. I would have been perfect for this assignment, but I'm not bitter, I'm moving on.)

3) Were the subjects measured soft or up and throbbing? There are show-ers and grow-ers after all, and the results might vary depending on how the subjects were handled (so to speak)

3a) On a related note, if the subjects were measured while hard, how was this state arrived at? It might make a difference in how turned on the subjects were by the examiners assuming that they "assisted" in achieving the aroused state.

3b) were the examined subjects self-identified as straight, gay or bi? It goes to the issue above of how turned on the examinees might have been by the examiners.

4) Were the examined specimens given any opportunity to put themselves in the best light for the examination? I'm a morning person, myself, and would probably measure best first thing in the morning.

 

I guess there are just too many unanswered questions here for me to take this lying down. I would propose a more scientifically-based study be embarked upon. Come on, people, this is important stuff. Let's lobby our congressmen for financing. God knows, Congress has funded some pretty sketchy stuff in the past so I don't think they can exactly plead the high road here given the importance of this issue in our national psyche. If your congressmen balks at this suggestion, you might point out that the US has always been competitive and doesn't take defeat lightly. The position of US dongs wasn't that strong a showing in the other studies. I think we americans would salivate at the opportunity to better our dong position on the world stage. Think of the Olympics. Perhaps if governmental funding is impossible, maybe someone could pitch the idea to network TV (sponsorships, anyone?) - a sort of cross between the super bowl, dancing with the stars, and America's got talent. I see an ongoing series here - something along the lines of the McNeil-Lehrer report, or at least Nightline with Ted Koppel when it was good.

Posted
Is this some sort of Saturday Night Live sketch waiting to happen or what? Before we take this scholarly study too much to heart, I suggest some healthy skepticism on several points:

1) How many subjects were "studied" and "sampled" within each country? Did people sign up or just show up to have their dongs measured? What kind of publicity was there to get the best cross-sectioning?

2) Who conducted the study itself and what special qualifications did the examiners have that qualified them for such an august assignment?- (side note: why was I not at least given the opportunity to help with the extensive field work clearly necessary? I love to travel and sample new things. I would have been perfect for this assignment, but I'm not bitter, I'm moving on.)

3) Were the subjects measured soft or up and throbbing? There are show-ers and grow-ers after all, and the results might vary depending on how the subjects were handled (so to speak)

3a) On a related note, if the subjects were measured while hard, how was this state arrived at? It might make a difference in how turned on the subjects were by the examiners assuming that they "assisted" in achieving the aroused state.

3b) were the examined subjects self-identified as straight, gay or bi? It goes to the issue above of how turned on the examinees might have been by the examiners.

4) Were the examined specimens given any opportunity to put themselves in the best light for the examination? I'm a morning person, myself, and would probably measure best first thing in the morning.

 

I guess there are just too many unanswered questions here for me to take this lying down. I would propose a more scientifically-based study be embarked upon. Come on, people, this is important stuff. Let's lobby our congressmen for financing. God knows, Congress has funded some pretty sketchy stuff in the past so I don't think they can exactly plead the high road here given the importance of this issue in our national psyche. If your congressmen balks at this suggestion, you might point out that the US has always been competitive and doesn't take defeat lightly. The position of US dongs wasn't that strong a showing in the other studies. I think we americans would salivate at the opportunity to better our dong position on the world stage. Think of the Olympics. Perhaps if governmental funding is impossible, maybe someone could pitch the idea to network TV (sponsorships, anyone?) - a sort of cross between the super bowl, dancing with the stars, and America's got talent. I see an ongoing series here - something along the lines of the McNeil-Lehrer report, or at least Nightline with Ted Koppel when it was good.

 

Hey Phil, I say we organize our own "taste testing" just to be sure. There is nothing more accurate than first hand info. Then we can give "word of MOUTH"...

Posted

I demand to see photographic documentation of such controversial claims. You may forward it to me in a plain vanilla envelope.

 

As a side note, I see there is "no data" for a few countries, including Croatia. I have noticed, in passing, that most of the top (no pun intended) Croatian basketball and tennis players are exceptionally tall and slim (i.e., 6'5"-6'10), with very big hands and unusually long fingers, characteristics which are generally thought to correlate with penis size. I would gladly volunteer to collect the necessary data for Croatians, to determine where they fit on the scale, if someone would bankroll me for the study.

Posted
I demand to see photographic documentation of such controversial claims. You may forward it to me in a plain vanilla envelope.

 

As a side note, I see there is "no data" for a few countries, including Croatia. I have noticed, in passing, that most of the top (no pun intended) Croatian basketball and tennis players are exceptionally tall and slim (i.e., 6'5"-6'10), with very big hands and unusually long fingers, characteristics which are generally thought to correlate with penis size. I would gladly volunteer to collect the necessary data for Croatians, to determine where they fit on the scale, if someone would bankroll me for the study.

 

Well to start you off on your study, a former Croatian co-worker and Pal was long, but very skinny. i think they call them "pencil dicks".... Verified when I had 20/20 eyesight....

Posted

These days, i am happy just to be close enough to tell if a guy's hard dick is 6.2 or 5.3 inches. Length of cock for me is more theoretic than real. In theory, I would love my partner to have a long, hard cock but for me 2 out of 3 aint bad, so, so long long; hello, hard cock

Posted

I have experienced many European countries, and glad to see the Italians and Hungarians are in the higher bracket - that was my experience too. Only met 4-5 Romanians, all pretty good shaped but only one was thick. The Czechs, Hungarians, Slovaks and Russians were consistently the best for me, never any major surprises.

 

Interestingly the map was skimpy (no pun intended) for the Caribbean...

Posted

I have more personal experience in African countries than European ones, so I went to the world map of penis size to check out their "statistics." I'll be transparent about my knowledge---limited to Nigeria, Cameroon, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Morocco, Gambia and Senegal. Also have limited experience with men of African descent from Guyana, Puerto Rico, Haiti and Dominican Republic. The world map has N/D( no data) for three of the four countries I have extensive experience in---Sierra Leone, Liberia and Gambia. I won't go into numbers---after reading a book called Proofiness by an author whose name I have forgotten---I just don't trust reports, studies that throw numbers around. The premise in Proofiness is that authors, researchers throw numbers in to make their research seem more reliable. It many cases it is not. Plus I don't carry a tape measure around with me and I am not that good at visual sizing.

My conclusions? For what they are worth, and I think they are as valuable as the World Maps: penis size varies within races, ethnic groups, nationalities, religions, almost any category possible--except perhaps porn stars or escorts. There are Nigerian men with organs of all sizes and dimensions---length, thickness, head size, etc. Same goes with the men of Sierra Leone and Liberia. Just as there is no Fountain of Youth anywhere, no Shangri-la; there is no nation, no group which has a monopoly on the "perfect" penis. As several have pointed out above---enjoy what is "at hand" and make the most of what he's got and you've got.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...