"I won't go into the details but"

[good ol boy]

I hate that expression when reading a review. Why write the review? Did the reviewer post to tell me that the person was prompt in replying to an email? Although this is important, it is not what I am looking for in am review. Did the guy kiss, if you were looking for kissing? Did he stick his tongue in your mouth or peck you on the cheek? What were you looking for and did you get it? I read the review on Heath today and I would love to see him. We do not live near one another. As a result of todays review, I got nothing. Thanks for reading....

[+ azdr0710]

that phrase has been notorious around here for years...and much-maligned for the same number of years.....

 

I do think some reviewers just aren't comfortable writing down the juicy details some of us want to hear...others may be trying to be discreet...still others may know that escorts will do things with some clients and won't do those things with others ("chemistry" and all that).....and still others are being jerks!.....

 

and the conclusion of this oft-discussed issue is always:

ask the escort yourself!!....and, as always, be polite, discreet, courteous, professional, and honest......

[Epigonos]

good ol boy I agree!!! Further let me add that the minute I read that phrase I STOP reading and move on to the next review.

[seeker630]

Is it the reviewer or the escort?

 

I hate that expression when reading a review. Why write the review? Did the reviewer post to tell me that the person was prompt in replying to an email? Although this is important, it is not what I am looking for in am review. Did the guy kiss, if you were looking for kissing? Did he stick his tongue in your mouth or peck you on the cheek? What were you looking for and did you get it? I read the review on Heath today and I would love to see him. We do not live near one another. As a result of todays review, I got nothing. Thanks for reading....

 

I was debating starting this thread; thanks to good ol boy for settling the issue for me.

 

Like the other posters on this thread so far, I'm disappointed by reviews which omit what I consider critical details, but I've learned to accept them (even tho, to my mind, they're like reataurant reviews which say, 'The service & food were great, but I won't tell you what I ate'.)

 

But I noticed that ALL of Heath's reviews thus far have that same lack of physical details - yet all are positive and apparently were written by different clients.

 

Now it's possible that some of those reviewers took their cue from the early reviews and perpetuated the style.

 

But I also started wondering - do some escorts deliver an experience or rapport that makes the clients reluctant to share the details? Perhaps more of the boyfriend experience than the 'animal sex' experience?

[NYTomcat]

BFE Hiring may look for and review different things

 

Honestly you know Im the BFE Hirer. Ive made no bones about that. And I would say the answer is yes.

 

Fantasy or not the experience to us is intimate. Not necessarily something we would do in public. and its often carried along with feeling that its shared between two people for a brief time and nobody elses business.

 

So when us BFE hirers review, we talk about the great personality the ease of setting up the appointment, we may talk about the fun things we did during the time together that do not revolve around sex. Then when we get down to the acts performed... IMHO a good BFE review alludes to how he made the client feel. How intimate and personal he made it. In fact, The better BFE escorts have made the experience so personal (at least in feeling) that you would feel yourself a cad (ok good old southern word that just works here) for disclosing the intimate time.

 

So while I do enjoy a good ... and then he lifted my right leg over his shoulders and.... review, Thats not my main reason for hiring.

 

So for a one hour hire (not my norm ) that review says alot to a BFE hirer about what heath was able to do. That helps sell me on someone like heath. So please keep em cumming.

[JT Brooklyn]

I won't go into DETAILS!

 

that phrase has been notorious around here for years...and much-maligned for the same number of years.....

 

I do think some reviewers just aren't comfortable writing down the juicy details some of us want to hear...others may be trying to be discreet...still others may know that escorts will do things with some clients and won't do those things with others ("chemistry" and all that).....and still others are being jerks!.....

 

and the conclusion of this oft-discussed issue is always:

ask the escort yourself!!....and, as always, be polite, discreet, courteous, professional, and honest......

 

azdr has said it all! Totally Agree !

[orbital sander]

Honestly, the reviews that go into too much detail about the cum shots, fucking, ass licking and etc bore the shit out of me. I cringe at reviews that go into a mini - sex novel. I do not need "erotic stories" to keep me interested. I am much more interested in the vibe of the experience, and the general attitude and behavior. I know that we all have different things that float our boats, so do not crucify me for sharing mine...

 

Thanks guys

[adriano46]

that phrase has been notorious around here for years...and much-maligned for the same number of years.....

 

I do think some reviewers just aren't comfortable writing down the juicy details some of us want to hear...others may be trying to be discreet...still others may know that escorts will do things with some clients and won't do those things with others ("chemistry" and all that).....and still others are being jerks!.....

 

and the conclusion of this oft-discussed issue is always:

ask the escort yourself!!....and, as always, be polite, discreet, courteous, professional, and honest......

 

Having written many reviews under my former name here (which... aging moment... escapes me now years later...) and under this name now, I often agree that it is in the details that often you are left with that phrase...

 

Personally, I check the "reviewer" and his description of himself (and guys, let's admit, we really leave a lot to the imagination there), and if the guy appears somewhat like me (or I know him from the Board), I tend to follow his "advice". What for me are deal-breakers in a date can often be just passing ho-hum facts for another guy. I definately tell an escot up front what I absolutely expect (kissing, romance, nice mutual body contact), and anything else thrown in (anal??) would be icing on the cake. But for the reviews I generally am happy with the minimal facts: Did he do what was expected? Who was the reviewer, and was he satisfied? The rest -- I can read porn on the internet any time.

[TruthBTold]

I have only gone to one escort and I have gone to him a number of times. I have always thought about writing a review of him but I started to have feelings for him. Not feelings of boyfriend love because I would never let myself go there (and I am sure there would be no reciprocation) but what I have to leave as feelings. Because of this, I always felt weird about describing the intimate details of our meetings. However, I always also felt that without these details the review would be rather worthless. If I was going to write, let alone read a review, a review, it would be for the sexual details to help guys decide whether they wanted to contact the escort I was writing about and if they would be sexually and emotionally compatible.

[Decatur Guy]

I like reviews that take a middle ground. With no details at all, I have no clue why the escort was so great (or bad). But I don't read the ultra-long mini-sex novels that go into every detail of every act either.

 

But if I'm hiring an escort to fuck me rough, let's say, I'd kinda need to know that's in his bag of tricks.

[josephga]

escorts will do things with some clients and won't do those things with others ("chemistry" and all that)

 

 

 

that's exactly why I don't think a review should have all the juicy details. It sets some future clients up for disapointment

[jackhammer91406]

Balance

 

I can understand wanting to see as much info in a review as possible. However, I also can relate to not wanting to feel like a writer of bad porn when I do a review.

Instead of saying "this guy can can suck a mean cock" I will sometimes simply refer to his gifted oral skills.

I am most interested in the overall impression an escort gives. Ease of scheduling. Easy to talk to. Does he kiss? Is there passion? Yes I will need to know if he bottoms and I would like an idea of his current condition but these things can be listed in the items above the experience paragraphs.

BUT to think that some might not be interested in my reviews if I don't put in all the salacious details...well, maybe my time has come and gone and it's time for others to do the writing.

[whipped guy]

Normally middle ground but..

 

I like reviews that take a middle ground.

That is my usual style but see below...

IMHO a good BFE review alludes to how he made the client feel. How intimate and personal he made it. In fact, The better BFE escorts have made the experience so personal (at least in feeling) that you would feel yourself a cad (ok good old southern word that just works here) for disclosing the intimate time.

As ironic as it may seem I look for the BFE as well when I hire… it is just that I guess I am looking for a different type of BF so I can appreciate whence Tomcat is coming.

 

Fascinatingly, while not overtly saying “I won’t go into the details…”, most of my reviews have not really described the intimate details in great specificity. I usually give a generalized feeling for the guy’s personality, demeanor, and skills… so that the reader gets not only a feeling for what the escort will do and won’t do, but can read in between the lines sufficiently so as to be able to extrapolate and get a generalized idea of from where the escort is coming. However, for my most recent review I was so overwhelmed by the experience that I felt compelled to delve into the details more than normally would be the case… Furthermore, this guy provided the ultimate BDSM BF experience… so there! Go figure! In retrospect the experience was so ingrained in my mind’s eye and had such a profound effect on me that I almost felt obligated to give a play by play type of review… When the review started to approach 2000 words I realized that I had to start summarizing as the result would have read like the script for some porno flick...

 

Still when I re-read the review when published it certainly helped me to remember what an overwhelming experience it indeed was... So perhaps that is why many reviewers seem obligated to disclose all the intimate minutiae...as a sort of personalized documentation of a special encounter.

Personally, I check the "reviewer" and his description of himself (and guys, let's admit, we really leave a lot to the imagination there), and if the guy appears somewhat like me (or I know him from the Board), I tend to follow his "advice".

Interestingly, I have always said that the YOU section of the review format is actually the most important section… as that is the place that gives the information where compatibility can somewhat be discerned.

 

Otherwise, as Brooklyn Guy always wisely advises (and as mentioned by azdr above)… ASK ASK ASK!

[+ purplekow]

I like my reviews Fair and Balanced

[seeker630]

I agree, ASK, ASK,but...

 

azdr has said it all! Totally Agree !

 

one point of the reviews is to confirm what an escort says about himself.

 

There ae numerous reviews here of instances in which escorts did not deliver as advertised.

[seeker630]

the balance

 

I can understand wanting to see as much info in a review as possible. However, I also can relate to not wanting to feel like a writer of bad porn when I do a review.

Instead of saying "this guy can can suck a mean cock" I will sometimes simply refer to his gifted oral skills.

I am most interested in the overall impression an escort gives. Ease of scheduling. Easy to talk to. Does he kiss? Is there passion? Yes I will need to know if he bottoms and I would like an idea of his current condition but these things can be listed in the items above the experience paragraphs.

BUT to think that some might not be interested in my reviews if I don't put in all the salacious details...well, maybe my time has come and gone and it's time for others to do the writing.[/color][/size][/font]

 

between providing enough useful detail and pornographic description can be found, but we won't all draw the line in the same place.

 

One point - I have seen people put items in the section above the description that weren't corrroborated in the narrative and I think sometimes this is based on hearsay or the escort's ad. (e.g., an escort is tagged as versatile but he only topped the client.)

 

If it's important to me that an escort bottom, I want a review that clearly says he bottomed for the client.

[+ Gar1eth]

Honestly, the reviews that go into too much detail about the cum shots, fucking, ass licking and etc bore the shit out of me. I cringe at reviews that go into a mini - sex novel. I do not need "erotic stories" to keep me interested. I am much more interested in the vibe of the experience, and the general attitude and behavior. I know that we all have different things that float our boats, so do not crucify me for sharing mine...

 

Thanks guys

 

I think there is a happy medium between the " mini-sex novel" review and the " I will not divulge the events of our meeting but rather will keep it as a sacred bond between the escort and myself" review. On the other hand maybe the "medium is not so happy" considering all the responses to this topic.

 

Gman

[+ Gar1eth]

I like my reviews Fair and Balanced

 

Is this also how you like your men?

 

(Sorry I couldn't resist)

 

Gman

[+ purplekow]

No I like my men swarthy and slight imbalanced

[Guest DuchessIvanaKizznhugg]

No I like my men swarthy and slight imbalanced

 

You like them to have 3 testicles??

[NYTomcat]

You like them to have 3 testicles??

 

Oh and that third nipple is always a plus

[instudiocity]

I have always thought about writing a review of him but I started to have feelings for him. ... I always felt weird about describing the intimate details of our meetings. However, I always also felt that without these details the review would be rather worthless.

 

TBT - just those words would make a great review. I wanna meet this guy who's worthy of multiple repeat business from you and it sounds like if not a BFE and definitely not a BOYFRIEND, he is a friend who meets your needs - sexually as well as emotionally.

 

WRITE!

[cmennow]

Honestly, the reviews that go into too much detail about the cum shots, fucking, ass licking and etc bore the shit out of me. I cringe at reviews that go into a mini - sex novel. I do not need "erotic stories" to keep me interested. I am much more interested in the vibe of the experience, and the general attitude and behavior. I know that we all have different things that float our boats, so do not crucify me for sharing mine...

 

Thanks guys

 

I do hate the "I won't go into details" comment. Why bother with a review then. I agree that we each have something that floats our boats. I think whether you are describing a BFE or a graphic roll in the hay, as long as you find a way to give enough detail without giving too much, then your review will be appreciated. Some of the reviews leave you wondering whether or not this would be a good match for you. Then as someone else mentioned there is the chemistry thing so you may not get what a previous reviewer got during their session anyway. It's the luck of the draw. BFEs are not my thing. I am more the roll in the hay type of guy. I probably do not want to describe graphic details for the fear of being looked down upon by the readers for what happened during an act. That shouldn't bother me though until this site comes up with webcam reviews LOL.

[jgoo]

I look for reviews to confirm that the escort's stats are accurate, they were reliable and respectful, and that they delivered what they said they would. Beyond that, any more detail is fine but not necessary.

[Boomer]

I thought that todays review of Edinson went into just enough detail. Not too much, not too little. For me reviews that say, "we had a wonderful time. I won't go into details because what happened between us is personal" are useless. It's not a review. It's a diary entry.