Jump to content

Scott Adler's Cover Picture (07-06-06)


KentuckyBoy
This topic is 6523 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

>>But at the recently quoted fee of $350/hr? Don't think so.

>

>Hey Lanky. I'm really sorry you feel that way. Not going to

>

>re-hash the Escort Fees thread which we ALL know and love but

>was a bitter comment like that really necessary considering

>$350/hr is NOT my quoted rate.

 

Then someone else must have been receiving and sending your e-mails when you were in New York last month.

 

 

Lankypeters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I must have missed something here. What's the problem? His picture is cute. Someone thinks he may have porked up a little. It happens, god knows, but it's not what you want your escort to do. So we wait to see what he does about it... Evidently took off the extra ounces, and is back in good shape. Meanwhile eveyone, including the escort, gets in a real knicker-twister. So what?

 

Scott-- if you've gained a few, well, welcome to the human race. Now, if you want to remain in Escort God Status, lose them. Otherwise, be a good guy, make hay while the sun shines, charm us all, make us feel good, and retire rich.

 

Guys -- why the drama? Is he good in the sack? Does he make you Feel Good? I hope so. Give the man a break!

 

Let's all go back to having a good time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>>But at the recently quoted fee of $350/hr? Don't think so.

>>

>>Hey Lanky. I'm really sorry you feel that way. Not going

>to

>>

>>re-hash the Escort Fees thread which we ALL know and love

>but

>>was a bitter comment like that really necessary considering

>>$350/hr is NOT my quoted rate.

>

>Then someone else must have been receiving and sending your

>e-mails when you were in New York last month.

>

>

 

......did look like you in the pictures you sent though.......

 

>Lankypeters

 

 

Lankypeters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ncm2169

>It's a HUGE mark of

>shame that this site doesn't censor such total fucking

>garbage.

 

We do, and did.

 

Now, watch your fucking language. >

 

I don't think anti-Semitism is funny. I hope you don't either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ncm2169

< Send an alert if you read something that's "absolutely outrageous and disgusting".

 

Oops. I should know that. My bad. x(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I don't think anti-Semitism is funny. I hope you don't either."

 

I didn't find it funny either, yet you didn't think it was serious enough to send an alert. Once it was brought to my attention, immediate action was taken both on and off the m/c. We don't fuck around when it comes to personal and offensive attacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Then someone else must have been receiving and sending your

>e-mails when you were in New York last month.

 

Did I say that was not my rate? Like my reviews here state ... my rates START at $250/hr. Point is there was no need for a bitter remark since you didn't like the rate quoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Evidently took off the extra ounces, and is back in good

>shape. Meanwhile eveyone, including the escort, gets in a

>real knicker-twister. So what?

 

LOL the point was someone took a comment in PRIVATE correspondance and included it here completely out of context and made an accusation that my photos were somehow "falsified" by me hiding a flaw.

 

I have ALWAYS stood on a principle that I like people to say I look better in person than my pictures and wouldn't want anyone to assume otherwise, hence the knicker-twister ;)

 

>Scott-- if you've gained a few, well, welcome to the human

>race. Now, if you want to remain in Escort God Status, lose

>them. Otherwise, be a good guy, make hay while the sun

>shines, charm us all, make us feel good, and retire rich.

 

LOL. I gained some in my personal time and was rewarded with a collegiate degree and some great travel photos ;) The point I was making was it wasn't his business to post things out of context.

 

>Guys -- why the drama?

 

Eh ... nothing much else to do around here these days :) As long as it's all good clean fun and gives people something to look forward to when they log in, who cares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ncm2169

I apologized for not sending an alert. Sorry, but I seldom use that feature here. Is that good enough? And BIG THANKS for removing the offending remarks. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Drama queens.

 

"the point was someone took a comment in PRIVATE correspondance and included it here completely out of context and made an accusation that my photos were somehow "falsified" by me hiding a flaw"

 

Oh. come on! I'm can't be the only one around here who knows how to have a little fun.

 

Of course, I was pinching Scott's nipple with my post and SO WHAT if I was referring to harmless "private" dialogue to further twist my pinch. I'm NOT the only one around here who knows how to actuate a little drama. (Btw, it worked.)

 

"Accusation?" "Falsified?" Oh, puhhhhleeeeeze, don't make me laugh so hard. It hurts.

 

"The point I was making was it wasn't his business to post things out of context."

 

But it sure was fun.

 

And the point I was making is that Scott would be an AWFUL model if he DID NOT suck-in his stomach during a naked-torso shot. NO model, worth ANY credential, steps in front of a camera, sans shirt, and lets a photographer snap a picture without the model's abs clenched. I stand by my loving, complimentary "accusation." :-)

 

I think it's pretty well known around these parts that I think Scott is sexy and adorable. But I'm never blinded by my affections and a truly smart escort would NEVER underestimate my "insights."

 

ps I am truly disappointed that Scott felt the need to call me "Rockhead" when my only motive was to have fun. The derogatory term reminds me of another uncreative, self-absorbed, bad-business escort. I would hate to get Scott confused with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The double standard here just floors me, Scott. Always has.

 

Posters here routinely lambast an escort for using out-of-date pictures but when an escort uses a recent picture he gets lamabasted too.

 

We (the collective "we") howl about escorts who are not honest about their appearance, and then we howl about those who are honest.

 

Perhaps you should go back to the bunny-butt picture. (I liked that one!) This crowd just wants to howl and whine. (Or kvetch and wail.)

 

Let the people who have met you comment, and ignore the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cooper,

 

I agree 8mile's post was Anti-Semitism, however where I think everyone else faults is that HE WAS MAKING A POINT! The exact same comments were made about Foxx of New York about his blackness and yet THEY STILL REMAIN. I've sent alerts and I've sent emails but still the same comments however swapped black with Jewish have not been edited. NO ONE HAS STEPPED UP TO CLAIM "It's a HUGE mark of shame that this site doesn't censor such total fucking garbage."

 

And Fin Fang Foom's comments have been left for days to savor and even attract applause from the viewing crowd.

 

Seems quite one-sided in my book.

 

By the way not too shabby pic you have there SA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>I sent one from (Jay Ganymede) but in all seriousness an

>alert was not needed for this listing.

 

Yes, an alert was needed, and an alert is why this posting got action. (Thanks very much to the whopping TWO people who cared enough to send alerts!)

 

We are not omniscient, and we really do appreciate alerts. And I still can't find an alert from Jay/Ganymeade in my recent archive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Sucks that I actually have to tell the

>moderators that a posting is offensive to black people without

>them knowing automatically.

 

Sorry. There are no mind-readers here, or speed readers.

 

(Even if some posters want you to believe they're mind-readers, they're not.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Humorous. A post referring to black escorts are low class requires an alert to be considered offensive after seen by 2000 sets of eyes. The sad part about it is that it should take a mind or a speed reader to figure that out deej. "Sorry" What this thread has been up less than a day? The other has been up for 4 days and you want to explain to me that you're sorry you didn't remove offensive material because you're (the moderators as a whole, don't want to single you out deej, I appreciate your responses) not a speed reader?

 

WOW, I mean I realize I'm packing a 144, a few degrees from pretty decent schools and pretty fucking amazing in bed but I would think a person of lesser qualifications would come to the same conclusion. There is no difference in equating a Black escort to the lower class than equating a Jewish escort to the lower class.

 

IN ANY RATE. I alerted. I alerted here and I alerted in "private" FFF's POSTING CURRENTLY still remains unchanged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the alert, Jay. I'm sure the moderators will give it the full attention it deserves and make a dispassionate and objective decision as they always do. If an issue exists, trust me those guys are bitchy enough to get their points across to the admins.

 

(And I love them for it!)

 

I ask you to accord them the same respect. It's not much to ask, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't mean to be a geek about all of this, but let me get this straight; there needs to be a pow-wow in order to determine if the words written by FFF's should be removed or not? The same words displayed here in this thread, (Black replaced by Jewish) "Foxx is Black therefore he is a low class escort: Scott is Jewish therefore he is a low class escort." The latter took less than an hour to be removed from this site yet the premier sentence is still placed on this site and has been for the last four days.

 

Help me out here. Obliviously I'm lacking logic here somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>I really don't mean to be a geek about all of this, but let

>me get this straight; there needs to be a pow-wow in order to

>determine if the words written by FFF's should be removed or

>not?

 

I'm saying any decision will be dispassionate and considered. You may not agree with the decision, but that's not an issue for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>The latter took less than an hour to be removed from this site

>yet the premier sentence is still placed on this site and has

>been for the last four days.

>

>Help me out here. Obliviously I'm lacking logic here

>somewhere.

 

I see your point Jay and also wonder the logic. But what good would it do to delete or edit FFF's offensive post after it has been allowed to stand for 4 days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...