Benjamin Nicholas comes clean

[luvtwink]

RE: Benjamin Nicholas comes clean - LOL

 

Guyz - BN has said if we didn't like what he wrote, we didn't have to read it....

 

And you know - if it weren't trashy gossip that was written all this would be moot too.

 

BN may want to re-name 15 minutes to the "Gay" Star.....

[AdamSmith]

RE: Benjamin Nicholas comes clean - LOL

 

>Guyz - BN has said if we didn't like what he wrote, we didn't

>have to read it....

 

The point is not that "we" read it. The point, as Rick says, is when prospective clients read it and hesitate to hire.

[VaHawk]

RE: Cleaning house.

 

Don't let them get to you RockHard. Keep posting, as you are a welcome voice, imo, and so far you seem to be able to see both sides, while acting like the gentleman that this site aspires to attract. Please keep in mind that the below quotes come from of the same people who have also railed against name-calling and call for civility and rave when someone they don't like, or who doesn't share their opinion, is banished. Just a sampling of their quotes from just this one thread, and further research will reveal many, many, many more such hypocritical wailings. In other words, its alright for them to do what they criticize others for doing.

 

From Lucky:

 

“Rockhard, are you becoming more of a BlowHard?”

“You may be a pretty prick, but a prick still!”

 

From Adam Smith:

 

“RockHard, you idiot. But I repeat myself.”

 

From Jackhammer:

 

” Hawk, you have your head stuck so far up BN's ass you can't think straight”

 

They, and not just them, sure practice the art of civil discussion, don't you agree?

[AdamSmith]

RE: Cleaning house.

 

>the same people who have also railed against

>name-calling and call for civility and rave when someone they

>don't like, or who doesn't share their opinion, is banished.

 

Please show me where I have done these things.

 

My problem with BN's discourse is not to do with the niceties of "civility" but putting groceries on the table.

[VaHawk]

RE: Hawk, pull your head out..

 

>Hawk, you have your head stuck so far up BN's ass you can't

>think straight. If this site links to BN's blog, then the

>offensive statement as much as appears here. Get it?

 

Wow, head up the ass? Is that some kinky new sex scene? Now, I'll admit that I've stuck my arm up a few asses ala fist fucking. But my head, nah, I don't think so! Sorry, but no I don't get how a link to another site equates with what is said on this site.

>

>Now, I don't think anyone can tell BN what to print in HIS OWN

>blog. But if he is going to print stuff, just to excite and

>cause controversy, then he has to accept the fallout (read

>responsibility) for his actions.

 

And he hasn't done so, just how again? Seems like he has been raked over the proverbial coals, by you and many others on this site, who for some reason, feel that they have the right to judge other people. As the Bible says "Judge not lest ye be judged".

 

>He can't keep commissioning his clients to come here and place the blame somewhere else (that's what Bush and his administration do). For those of you who are BN's apologists (oh wait, that's wrong, he hasn't >apologized) you guys need to get some sense of what is going

>on. These blind items could just as easily be about you next

>time. Then is it still ok, will it be your fault then (by

>your own reasoning)?

 

Hey BN if you read this, could you please send me the damn check already? Now you have gone and made me feel bad, as others are on your commission, according to JH, but so far you haven't sent me even so much as a 10cent coupon off my next purchase Trojans!

 

>See, it's like this; you and the others can trot out here

>every time he does something that shows his true (lack of )

>character, and still it doesn't make what he does all right.

 

 

Just like you and others trot out to assasinate his character, every time, someone cuts and pastes something from his blog and starts a negative thread about him. I still feel that no one would have associated his blog comment in anyway with R&D, if just that action had not been done.

>

>By your argument, it's ok for BN to peddle pigshit, just as

>long as we don't call it that and don't blame him for slinging

>it. Am I getting that right?

 

I never defended BN's comment, because for one thing, it didn't need defending. I was only making a statement that all assumptions that the couple was R&D was a result of cutting and pasting his comments from his blog on this site. Which, in turn, you didn't get right, but what the hell its probably too late for you to be setting precedents.

 

>Geesh

 

And a big DUH! back at you!

[+ Lucky]

RE: Come Cleaning the house.

 

"My problem with BN's discourse is not to do with the niceties of "civility" but putting groceries on the table."

 

Huh?

 

And Hawk, I will try to follow your example more in my future posts, okay?

 

 

[+ Lucky]

RE: Come Cleaning the house.

 

"My problem with BN's discourse is not to do with the niceties of "civility" but putting groceries on the table."

 

Huh?

 

And Hawk, I will try to follow your example more in my future posts, okay?

 

 

[AdamSmith]

RE: Come Cleaning the house.

 

>"My problem with BN's discourse is not to do with the

>niceties of "civility" but putting groceries on the table."

>

>Huh?

 

All right, straight reply to yr crack:

 

VaHawk says don't call someone else names after you have railed against name-calling and called for civility. In fact I agree. But I say I have never thus railed or called, except to call Benji on his dirt dishing. Which is more important than mere uncivil talk here because BN's words may hurt the business of anyone who may be understood to be whom he was talking about.

 

OK?

[Rick Munroe]

>A true Hallmark moment. I am sure that the others who you

>probably forgot to mention will be touched just as much.

 

I wasn't intending for anyone to be touched or moved or even care. Sometimes I speak from the heart, sometimes I speak with my cock, but in the end it all works out. Like Ashlee Simpson, I'm just being me.

[Rick Munroe]

>Speaking as one of the ones Rick probably forgot to mention

 

I did that on purpose because you're a competitive bitch (just kidding). Sorry for my grievous error, Bilbo.

[Rick Munroe]

>Did you ever see the movie with Nicole Kidmann and Sean

>Penn--the Interpreter?

 

No, I only watch sitcoms. Can you relate this more to an episode of, perhaps, Growing Pains or Gimme a Break? Then maybe I'll see your point.

 

>I doubt VERY seriously that BN's blog

>comment caused you one bit of discomfort--if it did, your

>exploitation of it more than paid you back with tons of

>attention!

 

Oh, you're so right. I took those untrue rumors of sickness and disease and just ran with it. :o

[Rick Munroe]

>Wow. I had to read that a couple of times

 

Once was enough for me.

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Hawk, pull your head out..

 

>These blind items could just as easily be about you next

>time.

 

I know you're talking to Hawk here, but it reminded me of something I forgot to say. Of course, I was especially bothered by this particular rumor, but I've also been unhappy to hear about previous blind gossip items about other escorts. I really don't see the point or value in any of it, whether it directly affects me or not.

[Rick Munroe]

Thanks, Mikel. And btw, "I'm still waiting" to experience that ultimate D.R. fantasy. }(

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Come Cleaning the house.

 

Well put, Adam.

[jackhammer91406]

RE: Hawk, pull your head out..

 

Sorry, but no I

>don't get how a link to another site equates with what is said

>on this site.

 

It's called tacit approval. It can be construed as support for what is written , either as truth or as acceptable. In both cases, it does represent a kind of editorial opinion, even in absence of an actual written editorial opinion. But it's OK if you don't see it that way. I understand, it's about perception and also possibly predisposition as to the person and his character (or lack thereof)..

 

 

 

>>

Seems like he has been

>raked over the proverbial coals, by you and many others on

>this site,

 

I only chime in when he does something I think is offensive or gives some non apology denial of responsibility. Otherwise, I leave him alone. He (and you) can't have it both ways. If you publish things that some people find over the line, you should be prepared to face disagreement, especially when what you publish seems intent on harming others. Where in the Bible does it talk about that? Got any verses for us?

 

 

who for some reason, feel that they have the right

>to judge other people. As the Bible says "Judge not lest ye

>be judged".

 

I do not accept your premise nor do I claim any right to judge for anyone else, only myself. My opinion only. Are we to stop posting opinions now because you don't agree with them. Hasn't Woodlawn, Doug and even you often chided me about the exact same thing?

 

>

>Hey BN if you read this, could you please send me the damn

>check already?

 

Commissioning someone doesn't necessarily involve money payment, nor in fact any payment. A task can be asked of someone as a favor, or a show of support, or even a barometer of approval.

 

 

>Just like you and others trot out to assassinate his character,

>every time, someone cuts and pastes something from his blog

>and starts a negative thread about him. I still feel that no

>one would have associated his blog comment in anyway with R&D,

>if just that action had not been done.

 

There you go again. The issue is not how the information got here, it's that he wrote it in the first place. You seem intent on blaming the guy who cut and pasted his remarks. Gee, they were BEN'S REMARKS. He shouldn't have to answer for that, no matter how the information got here? That's my point. And when it comes to assassination of character, what was the point of the blind item about the other escorts? It wasn't to place a shadow on someones career and PASS JUDGEMENT on how they may conduct their business? Never mind that he didn't name names. By leaving it open to speculation, he broadens the field to include any couple who escorts.

 

Which,

>in turn, you didn't get right,

 

I NEVER speculated in public what my guesses were. That's is not relevant, (see above).

 

 

but what the hell its probably

>too late for you to be setting precedents.

 

We shall see whether either of us learns anything from all of this.

>

>>Geesh

>

>And a big DUH! back at you!

 

Now THAT was funny, you made me laugh. :7

[VaHawk]

Of course it was, as you got what you wanted, huh? All that sympathy, histrionics, and self-promotion with your off-the-wall "defense" of yourself, when NOTHING, except your own protestations about BN's blog entry pointed the arrow at you and yours as the "couple" mentioned. And to further flame the fires, you started this tired old thread! Well as they say, desperate times call for desperate measures! :7

[+ deej]

You're really off base, Hawk. By a long shot.

 

The scary thing is that you don't realize what a tool you've become. You used to have opinions that were your own.

[VaHawk]

Thanks, deej, but I'm not anyone's tool. I'm well aware, as is anyone, who has been on this site for a while, of the less than amiable interactions between the parties involved. And I will stick by my opinions, which believe it or not, are still my very own!

[+ glutes]

Tool, or sycophant?

[jimbeaux]

I don't much care who wins the war of the words, but what I do find interesting is how a relatively decent looking escort who probably could have had a few more successful years of raking in the moola unwittingly participates in his own demise. I say unwittingly because it seems pretty clear that Mr. Nichols, in his "look at me, I'm so witty and cute" rants can't help but open his mouth cementing his asshole reputation.

 

Rest in peace, BN. That's more than you've wished for others.

[Bilbo]

"Grievous" is a pretty strong word, but, then, if you're into speaking with your cock (and other body parts?), perhaps I should wait for you to make up in person, 'cause here's the acceptance air kiss. (It wouldn't be air if you weren't three states away.) :*

[RockHard]

RE: For the deaf, dumb and blind...

 

Unfortunately, Lucky has problems with reading comprehension and AdamSmith...well, simply has problems (putting food on the table, perhaps). I never dictated to anyone "to take a hike" and I've fully acknowledged on numerous occasions that I believe everyone has a right to his/her opinion. The degree of illiteracy in this country is not "funny" to me.

 

How's this for a diatribe: Controlling site content and links on a website and controlling out-of-control men on an internet forum are two different things. If you are like AdamSmith and can't seem to tell the difference between web design, content, and service, then too bad for you. To better understand these business entities and their purpose, maybe it helps to own a business with more than one department other than the Asshole Department.

 

I also said in several posts that Daddy has the right to edit me and ban my username. Since I believe that name-calling is the lowest form of communication and a clear sign that someone has nothing more intelligent to say, I don't believe I've given Daddy any cause for concern. However, I'm fully capable of using acrimonious words to fight back the incendiary ignoramuses who insist on foaming at the mouth with fecal matter and spitting that crap at others, as long as Daddy is willing to tolerate it. (I honor and encourage Daddy to exercise his right to edit me and everyone who chooses to participate in the Message Center forum.)

 

ps I do love that you can use cuss words here. I just don't think you should be permitted to call someone an idiot, asshole, motherfucker, etc. This is not the road to civility. It's the opposite. (It may even be another name for the escortspeak toilet.)

[Bilbo]

RE: Hawk, pull your head out..

 

I think I did see a picture of a guy with a shaved head poking it up or at someone's ass one time. But don't ask me for any details. I came upon the picture rather by accident - You can't always tell what's happening in a thumbnail and I get curious, you know? - and I sure didn't look at it very long. }( And, no, it didn't look like you. Or I suppose it didn't. I've never gotten to see the top of your head.

Hugs, Bilbo the Lionkitty, feeling frisky this morning!

[Txpaytoplay]

RE: For the deaf, dumb and blind...

 

However,I'm fully capable of using acrimonious words to fight back

the incendiary ignoramuses who insist on foaming at the mouth

with fecal matter and spitting that crap at others,

 

So, How do you really feel Rock?

}(