Becket Posted May 8 Posted May 8 The boys were wearing outlandish stuff at the Met Gala thing. Lordy their lives have just blown up. marylander1940, MikeBiDude, Rod Hagen and 1 other 2 2
BSR Posted Friday at 01:09 PM Posted Friday at 01:09 PM 5 hours ago, Becket said: The boys were wearing outlandish stuff at the Met Gala thing. Lordy their lives have just blown up. I actually liked Storrie’s outfit. Or maybe I just liked how it highlighted his hunky arms and shoulders. Yeah, that’s probably it. marylander1940, samhexum, Becket and 1 other 1 2 1
d.anders Posted Friday at 01:31 PM Posted Friday at 01:31 PM 22 minutes ago, BSR said: I actually liked Storrie’s outfit. It's a little too feminine for me. marylander1940, samhexum, dutchal and 1 other 3 1
FLFunSized Posted Friday at 02:18 PM Posted Friday at 02:18 PM 46 minutes ago, d.anders said: It's a little too feminine for me. It’s WAY too feminine for me, completely ruins it samhexum 1
samhexum Posted Friday at 04:05 PM Posted Friday at 04:05 PM 2 hours ago, dutchal said: Hudson looks like he's auditioning for the lead in the next ping pong movie after he helps Bugs Bunny kill the bull. marylander1940 1
BSR Posted Friday at 04:46 PM Posted Friday at 04:46 PM 3 hours ago, d.anders said: It's a little too feminine for me. If you took away the cape, which besides being too feminine is just silly, stripped off the makeup (especially the lipstick), and removed one of the earrings (two matching earrings makes any man, any outfit look way too feminine), I think the outfit would work. Yes, the top looks like the cut of a woman’s dress, but with those bulging biceps and delts, I think he could pull it off. Hudson’s outfit is beyond saving. MikeBiDude, samhexum and Becket 1 2
samhexum Posted Friday at 07:39 PM Posted Friday at 07:39 PM Just read an article about foods with more protein than an egg and this is how they titled one entry: I'm Coming To The Cottage (Cheese) Becket 1
d.anders Posted Friday at 08:43 PM Posted Friday at 08:43 PM 3 hours ago, BSR said: Hudson’s outfit is beyond saving. I totally agree with this. Whoever did his hair and makeup was on crack. prof, marylander1940, BSR and 1 other 2 2
+ Gar1eth Posted Sunday at 01:19 AM Posted Sunday at 01:19 AM Sigh-where are the bisexual/gay hockey jocks I fell in love with? I'm not a fan of androgyny. samhexum 1
+ FrankR Posted Sunday at 03:29 AM Posted Sunday at 03:29 AM The Met gala is a charity for the costume institute. If you are not dressed outrageously, you don’t understand the assignment. And if you don’t like it, I offer the same advice that I give to those that complain about “gay” public displays of affection: look away and get over it. + jeezopete, samhexum, mike carey and 2 others 1 1 3
d.anders Posted Sunday at 04:55 PM Posted Sunday at 04:55 PM 13 hours ago, FrankR said: The Met gala is a charity for the costume institute. I can think of many other charities that are far more deserving of this level of attention and money. As far as I'm concerned, the Met gala has turned into Halloween for billionaires. I haven't given them much attention in a very long time. samhexum 1
+ FrankR Posted Sunday at 10:05 PM Posted Sunday at 10:05 PM 5 hours ago, d.anders said: I can think of many other charities that are far more deserving of this level of attention and money. As far as I'm concerned, the Met gala has turned into Halloween for billionaires. I haven't given them much attention in a very long time. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. As for the facts: I could be wrong…but as far as I know, neither Hudson Williams nor Connor Storrie is a billionaire.
MikeBiDude Posted Sunday at 11:34 PM Posted Sunday at 11:34 PM 20 hours ago, FrankR said: The Met gala is a charity for the costume institute. If you are not dressed outrageously, you don’t understand the assignment. And if you don’t like it, I offer the same advice that I give to those that complain about “gay” public displays of affection: look away and get over it. Well gosh help me, but I think they look great considering the occasion. Out there yes, but stunning for this event. + jeezopete, + FrankR and samhexum 1 1 1
samhexum Posted Monday at 01:54 AM Posted Monday at 01:54 AM 22 hours ago, FrankR said: The Met gala is a charity for the costume institute. If you are not dressed outrageously, you don’t understand the assignment. And if you don’t like it, I offer the same advice that I give to those that complain about “gay” public displays of affection: look away and get over it. 8 hours ago, d.anders said: I can think of many other charities that are far more deserving of this level of attention and money. As far as I'm concerned, the Met gala has turned into Halloween for billionaires. I haven't given them much attention in a very long time. 2 hours ago, MikeBiDude said: Well gosh help me, but I think they look great considering the occasion. Out there yes, but stunning for this event. I just wanna know what Connor has in his clutch; it looks like a lot more than his keys and lipstick.
d.anders Posted Monday at 11:59 AM Posted Monday at 11:59 AM 13 hours ago, FrankR said: I could be wrong…but as far as I know, neither Hudson Williams nor Connor Storrie is a billionaire. Hudson Williams and Connor Storrie are pawns. The Met gala is a media event, and Hudson and Connor are the two newest flavors of the month. As far as I know, none of the invited stars have to pay for their seat at a table.
+ Gar1eth Posted Monday at 04:51 PM Posted Monday at 04:51 PM The sheikh is dead. Long live the new sheikh. MikeBiDude 1
samhexum Posted Monday at 06:53 PM Posted Monday at 06:53 PM 1 hour ago, Gar1eth said: The sheikh is dead. Long live the new sheikh. more like the chic is dead long live the new chic although an overstuffed clutch is gauche + Gar1eth 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now