Available for videos

[Redbook]

I have noticed that some providers on RM indicate they are “available for videos.” What does that mean?  Is it like an OF collab thing? Or does it mean they let clients record the sessions? And is that usually an extra charge?  Thanks

[DMonDude]

Probably both if i had to guess. Probably also could mean available for hire by porn studios. But i would think the two examples you gave probably happen more often.

[56harrisond]

Old closed threads 

[Nightowl]

If he has an OF or JFF site, I doubt that the provider would let *you* record the session since the whole point of making the video is to make money for *him*.  He would most likely want to control what happens with the video.  I think he’s either looking for willing guys to film and make money off of on his own OF/JFF site or not-so-subtly putting himself out there for potential porn hiring offers.  

[big-n-tall]

It could mean a few things. …that they are available to film for studio porn/fan content or for private sessions or maybe they click it as a ploy to get more interest. It’s best to ask the provider directly because only that individual can give you the answer of what it means to them.

Edited 8 hours ago by big-n-tall

[NYXboy]

17 hours ago, Nightowl said:

If he has an OF or JFF site, I doubt that the provider would let *you* record the session since the whole point of making the video is to make money for *him*.  He would most likely want to control what happens with the video.  

Pure speculation on your part here. 

 

No video can be posted on these sites with out a consent form signed, and full identification submitted and verified by the sites. 

[BuffaloKyle]

17 hours ago, Nightowl said:

If he has an OF or JFF site, I doubt that the provider would let *you* record the session since the whole point of making the video is to make money for *him*.  He would most likely want to control what happens with the video.  I think he’s either looking for willing guys to film and make money off of on his own OF/JFF site or not-so-subtly putting himself out there for potential porn hiring offers.  

Even if someone has an OF if a client will pay extra to film the session they'll usually be up for it. Usually the client just wants it for his own personal collection, not to put it online.

[+ Jamie21]

3 hours ago, BuffaloKyle said:

Even if someone has an OF if a client will pay extra to film the session they'll usually be up for it. Usually the client just wants it for his own personal collection, not to put it online.

It’s not quite as simple as that though. I’m up for clients filming their session with me, but only if they sign a consent and release form (online) for me to publish it on OnlyFans. You can’t simply publish a film on Onlyfans without all the participants agreement provided on the Onlyfans platform. Most clients, when confronted with putting their real name and ID into OnlyFans decide they’d rather not do it! So no filming happens. I’m ok if they want a few pics or a short clip but that’s just for them to keep, it doesn’t get published. Filming the whole session for them to keep is not happening, it’s too intrusive and distracting. 

Yesterday I had a client want a couple of pics of me and him during the session so he could show his wife. Happy to oblige with that.