Too Tight

[Aceface]

I feel like I’m getting more and more guys who are telling me they are too tight to bottom but they are listed as a bottom or verse. Is anyone else getting that more often? They also expect full pay even if we didn’t do what was previously agreed upon. I feel like it’s their new scheme. 

[misterhumphries]

27 minutes ago, Aceface said:

I feel like I’m getting more and more guys who are telling me they are too tight to bottom but they are listed as a bottom or verse. Is anyone else getting that more often? They also expect full pay even if we didn’t do what was previously agreed upon. I feel like it’s their new scheme. 

If penetration was discussed in advance and agreed upon, then you have every right to expect it. If the escort tries to pull a switch at the last minute, I would not engage in haggling. The encounter must be voluntary for both parties. I would not use the threat of withholding cash to coerce a man into performing an act -- for whatever reason -- he says he doesn't want to do. I wouldn't hesitate to tell him that his fee will be reduced.

[Aceface]

I’m just wondering if it’s happening to other guys too, kind of seems like a scam these days. 

[soloyo215]

3 hours ago, Aceface said:

I feel like I’m getting more and more guys who are telling me they are too tight to bottom but they are listed as a bottom or verse. Is anyone else getting that more often? They also expect full pay even if we didn’t do what was previously agreed upon. I feel like it’s their new scheme. 

It hasn't happened to me. Once the opposite happened. I decided not to do anything with the provider and still paid him (long story).

If it was agreed that they are going to bottom, it's not ok to expect full pay if they don't. "I'm too tight to bottom" has to be the lamest excuse to get away from bottoming. I admit I have used it in the past.

I know that now we have websites for bookings, legal ways of still doing what we want with escorts, and many protections by being able to trace people's information, but at the end of the day, scamming remains a part of this line of business, so there will be people trying to get as much and give as little as they can get away with.

I believe it's a way of scamming clients.

[Aceface]

2 hours ago, soloyo215 said:

It hasn't happened to me. Once the opposite happened. I decided not to do anything with the provider and still paid him (long story).

If it was agreed that they are going to bottom, it's not ok to expect full pay if they don't. "I'm too tight to bottom" has to be the lamest excuse to get away from bottoming. I admit I have used it in the past.

I know that now we have websites for bookings, legal ways of still doing what we want with escorts, and many protections by being able to trace people's information, but at the end of the day, scamming remains a part of this line of business, so there will be people trying to get as much and give as little as they can get away with.

I believe it's a way of scamming clients.

It for sure is a new scam. I’m now not paying upfront anymore. I pay after so they don’t pull that anymore. It happens more from the newer younger guys. 

[+ KensingtonHomo]

I can't say if anyone is scamming. But as someone who's 90% a bottom, some days it's not in the cards. Perhaps saying they're "too tight" is a way of not having to say their stomach is upset or they have hemorrhoids. Either way, they should inform you that they're not up for it and offer to reschedule or reduce the rate. 

That said, I've been disappointed more than one by a top who couldn't stay hard. Do people think that should also result in a reduced fee?

[Aceface]

5 hours ago, KensingtonHomo said:

I can't say if anyone is scamming. But as someone who's 90% a bottom, some days it's not in the cards. Perhaps saying they're "too tight" is a way of not having to say their stomach is upset or they have hemorrhoids. Either way, they should inform you that they're not up for it and offer to reschedule or reduce the rate. 

That said, I've been disappointed more than one by a top who couldn't stay hard. Do people think that should also result in a reduced fee?

If they are paying for it then yes, you should get a reduced rate. There is a pill for that though.