Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
56 minutes ago, KensingtonHomo said:

Your response is to quote a nepo-baby, man-child, who owes his billions to government contracts, has run Twitter into the ground, and is so anti-gay and transphobic that his child has disowned him? 

Like I said, Trump supporter.

And that's the best you can do is name call to "support" an argument you refuse to give up. Members of the jury, I rest my case! 🙄

Posted

I think a lot of the distinction between aversion and preference  rests on decorum. I am a big supporter of expressing, exploring, and discussing opinions and preferences.  

However, when engaging in debates with adults about differences, in order to keep those discussions fruitful, thought provoking, and thought challenging, they need to be logical and appropriate.   If a discussion shifted to say clean shaven/facial hair, like most topics, expression of support for either is easy. Expressing dislike can always be a little dicier.  

It wouldn't be a worthwhile discussion if all I hear are things like bearded men, and the guys who like them, are unclean and akin to dirty homeless guys who are hiding their face from me, and are too lazy and poor to afford and use a razor. OR, clean shaven men, and the guys who like them, are really just shallow men who lead vapid lives without enough to do, and are really just deluding themselves into believing they're not pedophiles who secretly desire boys not old enough to grow facial hair.  

Ridiculing another's choice in a vicious manner is NOT a DISCUSSION or a DEBATE. If I wanted venemous thoughts thrown at me for my sex choices, instead of coming to CoM nightly, I could find myself an ultra conservative church to go to every night. Hell, they would even eliminate any debate for me on which man was most attractive! It'd all be a disgusting, dirty obomination.   

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...