4 Invitations - one night

[ready182]

You check your e-mail, and you have four perspective clients for a specific night, all of which you have met before.

 

"John" is generally a pain in the ass, somewhat rude, not particularly attractive, and not always as clean as you would like -- but he always springs for an overnight; buys expensive entertainment (shows, concerts, etc), food, and drink for you; and is a really big tipper.

 

"Jack" is hot! Truth be known, you would almost consider paying Jack to spend time with him, because the encounters you have are so-o-o-o-o hot. Jack only books 1- or 2-hour appointments, and does not tip.

 

"Joe" is average looking, ultimitely polite, but a bit boring. Likes to talk alot, mostly about himself. Joe typically wants a 3- or 4-hour appointment, and you can be sure you will never leave his room. Joe always provides a modest tip in addition to the fee.

 

"Jim" is well over 60 years old. Jim is a bit on the kinky side -- but mostly he just likes to slober all over you, FOR HOURS! Jim always books a 6-hour meeting, but does not tip. Since Jim never "finishes", it's always a LONG 6 hours. The best thing about Jim is he books you at least once a week - pays alot of bills.

 

So, escorts, which client would you go see??????????????

[theDCeBOY]

Joe

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

A Trick Question

 

I could pull a "W" and say that since this is a trick question , I will not answer it (even though, like he at his press conference yesterday, I would sadly misunderstand the concept); however, in the spirit of absurb hypothetical questions everywhere, I offer the following:

 

>You check your e-mail, and you have four perspective clients

>for a specific night, all of which you have met before.

 

 

This is an extremely unlikely possibility, even for an extremely popular escort. For one thing, anyone in business for themselves would do a good job of organizing and planning their schedules, which includes organizing their "opportunities."

 

So, essentially your question boils down to which client or clients you would pick over the others. So, a couple of more generalized thoughts.

 

>"John" is generally a pain in the ass, somewhat rude, not

>particularly attractive, and not always as clean as you would

>like -- but he always springs for an overnight; buys expensive

>entertainment (shows, concerts, etc), food, and drink for you;

>and is a really big tipper.

 

Any escort who would base his decision on purely financial considerations (and I can full well understand why at times he might need to) will simply live to regret these choices and tend not to have much longevity in this profession.

 

That said, if I was just trying to pay off some debt, save for college, or something along those lines, it would be stupid for anyone to not attempt to maximize their earning potential. However, for me personally, no one who is rude would ever get an appointment in the first place and if they did, they would not get a second appointment - for one hour or one night. Life is too short and no amount of money is worth it.

 

>"Jack" is hot! Truth be known, you would almost consider

>paying Jack to spend time with him, because the encounters you

>have are so-o-o-o-o hot. Jack only books 1- or 2-hour

>appointments, and does not tip.

 

Tipping is not something I expect, require, nor encourage. It is always nice when it happens but does not factor in what appointments I might or might not take.

 

Some escorts will suggest that they look for something attractive or appealing in all of their clients; I believe this is true of all escorts who have longevity and repeat business. Any time I spend with a client is time out of my life and once again, life is too short to spend it other than in a manner I otherwise would select.

 

 

>"Joe" is average looking, ultimitely polite, but a bit boring.

> Likes to talk alot, mostly about himself. Joe typically

>wants a 3- or 4-hour appointment, and you can be sure you will

>never leave his room. Joe always provides a modest tip in

>addition to the fee.

 

 

>"Jim" is well over 60 years old. Jim is a bit on the kinky

>side -- but mostly he just likes to slober all over you, FOR

>HOURS! Jim always books a 6-hour meeting, but does not tip.

>Since Jim never "finishes", it's always a LONG 6 hours. The

>best thing about Jim is he books you at least once a week -

>pays alot of bills.

 

One of the things I attempt to do with many of my repeat clients is provide experiences which they will find both interesting and appealing; one way I hope to do this is by varying the tenor and other aspects of the session. A three or four hour session would never cover the same conversational ground and if companionship and conversation is the primary motivation of a client, this can best be shared any number of ways. As for "finishing;" I would hope and anticipate that my clients enjoy themselves and would be personally disappointed if they did not find release, assuming that is (and it usually is) an aspect of what they hope for.

 

Finally: I personally have a first come, first served policy and see, while at home, only one client a day. Therefore, while I would not meet "John" again due to his rudeness, of the remaining three clients, the one who made specific arrangements first would get the appointment, irrespective of tipping, length, etc.

[Guest Merlin]

RE: A Trick Question

 

I can only guess what I would do as an escort, but it seems to me that the last client, who hires you at least once a week for 6 hours, is the most valuable client from a financial point of view. His support would probably be the most difficult to replace, would it not? You would miss him if you lost him, and you might end up having to find 6 old guys to slobber over you for an hour each.

[+ Charlie]

"Jim" must be pretty well off if he can afford to hire you six hours a week (by my calculations that's about $60K a year [untaxed], which I could live on without any other clients). He's definitely a keeper, no matter how much he slobbers over you.

[Bilbo]

If I know all of these men well enough to have the notes you've provided me with from my own experience it is obvious that all of them are regulars. As such, there is no reason to think that I am going to lose any of them who are put off for a day or two. I value all of them, and they value me or they wouldn't be regulars. I would go with John who takes me to expensive entertainments, because he would seem to be the one who probably has more tied to the actual time of our appointment. He may have already bought tickets to something and therefore has a more practical reason why he has to have that evening rather than any other time. Therefore, he is also the one who would be most likely to hire someone else instead of waiting for me, someone else who might tempt him into changing allegiences.

 

This is a fun game so long as we overlook the no-win aspect of there being some clients who might be slighted should they feel they recognize any of the postponed client profiles as caricatures of people like themselves. Which, IMHO, explains to me why most of the escorts who are willing to answer you being those who play to a somewhat smaller niche than others do. We are confident that those who want us want us and may have trouble finding anyone else like us. A twink would be a bit dumb to answer you this time. So might I suggest that you watch that angle when you think up threads like this in the future?

[axebahia]

RE: A Trick Question

 

I agree, Jim really skews the question. It is much more interesting if you take him out, although Bilbo may be right about the reticence of some escorts to respond to a question such as this. I guess that's why it is good for escorts like Ethan to have another handle like Oren.

[Prime Muscle]

Definitely book Jack but make it an early appointment. Then meet up with Joe for a few hours.

[ready182]

"So might I suggest that you watch that angle when you think up threads like this in the future?"

 

You might suggest anything you like ...

[Bilbo]

Thank you.

[btmstudnyc]

Lotsa Cash

 

Hot Sex

 

Lotsa Normal Sane and Secure

 

Lotsa Work

 

 

Depends on your value system.

 

I'm with Franco though....First CUM, First SERVED.

 

But with the email..you get to choose who you want to be first right?

 

You know what is frightening...that is the name of all my brothers.

 

Hmm....Id ask if they wanted to do an orgy.

If it dont fit, force it

btmstudnyc@aol.com

[+ Lucky]

"I'm with Franco though"

 

But you answer was a lot briefer than his!

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

Yes, But . . .

 

. . . I do not wear briefs.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Yes, But . . .

 

Just panties?

[AaronScottDC]

>"Jack" is hot! Truth be known, you would almost consider

>paying Jack to spend time with him, because the encounters you

>have are so-o-o-o-o hot. Jack only books 1- or 2-hour

>appointments, and does not tip.

>

>So, escorts, which client would you go see??????????????

 

 

Jack, definitely Jack! }( :9

 

 

Aaron Scott DC

http://www.erados.com/AaronScottDC

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/aaronscottdc.html

[theDCeBOY]

why jack? i can get hot sex with hot guys anytime. if i'm working, paying the rent & spoiling my puppy tend to guide me more than what's hot or not.

[AaronScottDC]

>why jack? i can get hot sex with hot

>guys anytime. if i'm working, paying the rent & spoiling my

>puppy tend to guide me more than what's hot or not.

 

 

Why not have fun while you work? Best of both worlds in my opinion. He asked the question, I answered it.

 

Aaron Scott DC

http://www.erados.com/AaronScottDC

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/aaronscottdc.html

[theDCeBOY]

>Why not have fun while you work? Best of both worlds in my

>opinion.

 

that's why i chose as i did: to minimise any unpleasantness while sticking to the purpose of the whole adventure and not permitting an overactive libido to trump business sense.

different strokes, i suppose.

[AaronScottDC]

>>Why not have fun while you work? Best of both worlds in my

>>opinion.

>

>that's why i chose as i did: to minimise

>any unpleasantness while sticking to the purpose of the whole

>adventure and not permitting an overactive libido to trump

>business sense.

>different strokes, i suppose.

 

 

Yeah, I'm sure "Joe" would be just fine, too. I guess it depends on who sent the email message first.

 

Aaron Scott DC

http://www.erados.com/AaronScottDC

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/aaronscottdc.html

[theDCeBOY]

>I guess it

>depends on who sent the email message first.

 

yeah... and some people are more than willing to be flexible & see someone on a different day. mention that you've had many requests all at once & a great many clients would offer to postpone.

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

That is for

 

>Just panties?

 

escorts in their twenties (and the men who hire them). . .

 

I wear nothing at all.

[giovoni]

Look at the time stamps on the emails. Whoever's email landed in my box first gets the appointment. The other three people get a nice email explaining that any other decision making process would introduce trying to play favorites in a way that I would be uncomfortable trying to figure out.

 

The advantages and disadvantages of each client are irrevevant in this case. When you escort you do it with the understanding that some clients will be easier to deal with then others. As long as you're honest with every client about what your policies are and how to avoid losing out on your time in the future by booking in advance I think clients would respect your decision.

 

The fact that one client supposedly hires you once a week but waited until the night of his once a week appointment to book is really not something that ever happens with regular clients though, when I have had weekly visitors they have always booked their next week appointment in advance. Especially if they want to hire for 6 hours at a time. If you did have a client that hired you that often I'm sure he would know that booking at the last second is a precarious way to get your time especially knowing as my clients do (did) that when two or more people ask for the same time the one who sent the email first gets the time.

 

Gio in Denver

[Guest ChicagoCorey]

Typically I'd avoid rude-but-overnight John like the plague; I can deal with rude for an hour but an all-nighter with it often makes me rude to the client as well.

 

In fact, all things being equal, I'd probably go for hot, hot Jack, especially since Jim seems to book you so often (logic being that his schedule is more flexible -- if you can't get with him today, you might get to see him tomorrow)

 

Unfortunately, all things are not equal, and in a situation where I need immediate cash, I'd probably end up choosing rude John.

 

--Corey, ever the pragmatist, especially after balancing his checkbook this morning after a long weekend and had a horrible surprise