What Words Are Censored on RM?

[tanman4u]

I've been noticing some of the text in RM profiles seem to have been censored.

For example:

 ****, masculine, handsome face, I go from wild to anything in between 

Able to offer everything from special experience to ******** dominant.

I travel nowhere with no ******** SENT

Take a look at my private gallery and videos on ********

𝔸ℕ𝔻 𝕃𝕆𝕍𝔼 𝕊ℍ𝕆𝕎𝕀ℕ𝔾 𝕆𝔽𝔽 𝕄𝕐 𝟠,𝟝 𝕀ℕℂℍ***** 

******** in FF

Into ******** slaves

I thought maybe the F bomb was one of the banned words but I see it in other profiles.  One of the examples above is probably referring to another site like Only Fans but yet I see that freely mentioned in other profiles.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[pubic_assistance]

The words: sex, sexy sexual have been blanked out forever.

[BuffaloKyle]

When you go to update your profile text you get this popup message:

Any text that promotes escorts services or other services that may be interpreted as providing sexual acts in exchange for compensation is strictly forbidden, including information about rates or donations. It is not allowed to publish phone numbers, social media profiles, email addresses or external links, except personal websites.

I would still say though there are plenty of profiles that cross the line then technically. When you update your ad text it has to get approved first. I guess it just depends on who the moderator is doing it at the time for what gets through. 

[nate_sf]

I had the word “companion” struck from my profile. 
Sure, I could fuck you silly, but provide companionship? Perish the thought! 

[Boink]

On 4/6/2022 at 8:43 AM, BuffaloKyle said:

When you go to update your profile text you get this popup message:

Any text that promotes escorts services or other services that may be interpreted as providing sexual acts in exchange for compensation is strictly forbidden, including information about rates or donations. It is not allowed to publish phone numbers, social media profiles, email addresses or external links, except personal websites.

 

Hmmm....do you think this rule extends to text conversations on their chat/messenger function when trying to converse privately with a 'provider'?

[Kevin Slater]

24 minutes ago, Boink said:

Hmmm....do you think this rule extends to text conversations on their chat/messenger function when trying to converse privately with a 'provider'?

I'm not sure, but that we even have to ask is another reason why I'm eager to get these conversations off their platform and onto texting (or some other medium I control). 

Kevin Slater