Bottombunktwunk (currently in Philadelphia)......

[+ StLouisOct]

He sure looks good, and he’s been a prompt and responsive communicator with me, but his rates are $400/hr and $600 for two hours. That was disappointing.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

17 minutes ago, StLouisOct said:

That was disappointing.

Why is that?

[+ azdr0710]

1 hour ago, StLouisOct said:

He sure looks good, and he’s been a prompt and responsive communicator with me, but his rates are $400/hr and $600 for two hours. That was disappointing.

With glowing endorsements upthread from established forum members, I'd say the two-hour option is fair and reasonable (if his rate is what disappointed you). 

[+ StLouisOct]

11 hours ago, Benjamin_Nicholas said:

Why is that?

Because I’ve had an awful lot of 10 performances from escorts at my maximum budget of $300/hr $500/2 and $100 more per hour is a lot to pay (from my perspective). I’d save that for a special event and, at that rate, I would be really pissed if it wasn’t a 10 performance.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

13 minutes ago, StLouisOct said:

Because I’ve had an awful lot of 10 performances from escorts at my maximum budget of $300/hr $500/2 and $100 more per hour is a lot to pay (from my perspective). I’d save that for a special event and, at that rate, I would be really pissed if it wasn’t a 10 performance.

Well, as it seems you're not going to hire this guy, you need not worry.

But thankfully... Lots of fish in the sea

Edited March 27, 2022 by Benjamin_Nicholas

[guru68]

55 minutes ago, StLouisOct said:

Because I’ve had an awful lot of 10 performances from escorts at my maximum budget of $300/hr $500/2 and $100 more per hour is a lot to pay (from my perspective). I’d save that for a special event and, at that rate, I would be really pissed if it wasn’t a 10 performance.

Is there a point deduction if the dismount is bad? 😀

[sydneyboy]

There is a Rentmen review dated December 2021 that makes sad almost heartbreaking reading.

[BabyBoomer]

56 minutes ago, sydneyboy said:

There is a Rentmen review dated December 2021 that makes sad almost heartbreaking reading.

I find it strange that a review from 3 months ago suddenly appeared. 

~Boomer~

[hwic04]

Could someone give a synopsis of the December 2021 review? 

[+ KensingtonHomo]

4 hours ago, hwic04 said:

Could someone give a synopsis of the December 2021 review? 

He had a client in his 60s with Parkinson’s,  which he divulged, who had to cancel an appointment last minute but paid him. They made another appointment to which the client was late due to his disability. When he arrived the provider refused to see him and told him he was an “old cripple.” 
 

Honestly, fuck this kid. No one should hire him. 

[hwic04]

I am literally sorry I asked. That is horrible. Thank you for replying, KH, if for no other reason than the more the word gets out on this provider, the fewer people will hire him. 

 

[+ KensingtonHomo]

8 hours ago, hwic04 said:

I am literally sorry I asked. That is horrible. Thank you for replying, KH, if for no other reason than the more the word gets out on this provider, the fewer people will hire him. 

 

I hope so. It gives providers a bad rep. And I know so many who are amazing, kind guys who would have treated this client with the utmost respect. 

[BuzzLiteQueer]

On 4/19/2022 at 8:30 PM, KensingtonHomo said:

He had a client in his 60s with Parkinson’s,  which he divulged, who had to cancel an appointment last minute but paid him. They made another appointment to which the client was late due to his disability. When he arrived the provider refused to see him and told him he was an “old cripple.” 
 

Honestly, fuck this kid. No one should hire him. 

FWIW, that review is no longer there.

All of the remaining 14 reviews are very positive.  Some with brief positive comments, which I find more credible than the long run on paragraphs about the RM and the exeperience.

[guru68]

37 minutes ago, BuzzLiteQueer said:

FWIW, that review is no longer there.

All of the remaining 14 reviews are very positive.  Some with brief positive comments, which I find more credible than the long run on paragraphs about the RM and the exeperience.

It's certainly damning if true, but it also wouldn't be the first time someone has tried to trash a provider. Without some way to confirm, the man deserves the benefit of the doubt, IMHO.

[bottombunktwunk]

15 hours ago, guru68 said:

It's certainly damning if true, but it also wouldn't be the first time someone has tried to trash a provider. Without some way to confirm, the man deserves the benefit of the doubt, IMHO.

Figured I should say something about this encounter to clear the air. First of all, I do not discriminate against age, disability, race, weight, etc. As you can see from the rest of my reviews, this was an outlier. That being said, providers have every right to decline meeting if a client makes them feel uncomfortable or unsafe. It has been confirmed from other providers that this particular client has made them feel uncomfortable/unsafe.

So here's my side of the story...

*The client did not disclose his medical condition before meeting.

*First meeting: Client cancels ~30 minutes before appointment because "he did not feel well".  Client offers to compensate me for my lost time so long as I agreed to meet with him again. I accepted the conditions and rescheduled.

*Second meeting: Client is 30+ minutes late. (First thought is "he is flaking") Then I see Client being carried into the lobby by two men, twitching, unable to stand on his own, causing a scene. I assumed Client was on drugs and I made a game time decision to run out of the hotel without engaging with him. I did not feel safe. I texted Client saying I had to cancel because he was late and I needed to make it to my next appointment. Client then tells me about his medical condition and demands I meet with him because he had already compensated me for my time. I reimbursed Client and asked that he not contact me again. 

*Third meeting: Client created a new profile, a new phone number and arranges to meet without identifying himself. I see Client walking into the lobby and I walk out. Again I text the Client not to contact me.

*Fourth (attempted) meeting: Client created a new profile, a new number. Client identifies himself and I reiterate that I will not meet him. Client writes negative review.

*Fifth meeting: Client has another provider contact me and arranges to meet. Provider tells me it is a private client. Upon arriving, I realize who the Client is. I leave without engaging. Client deletes negative review to make amends. Provider tells me that Client has mental health issues in addition to Parkinson's and that no providers in the Seattle area are willing to meet with this client for similar reasons. 

 

[+ StLouisOct]

1 hour ago, bottombunktwunk said:

Figured I should say something about this encounter to clear the air. First of all, I do not discriminate against age, disability, race, weight, etc. As you can see from the rest of my reviews, this was an outlier. That being said, providers have every right to decline meeting if a client makes them feel uncomfortable or unsafe. It has been confirmed from other providers that this particular client has made them feel uncomfortable/unsafe.

So here's my side of the story...

*The client did not disclose his medical condition before meeting.

*First meeting: Client cancels ~30 minutes before appointment because "he did not feel well".  Client offers to compensate me for my lost time so long as I agreed to meet with him again. I accepted the conditions and rescheduled.

*Second meeting: Client is 30+ minutes late. (First thought is "he is flaking") Then I see Client being carried into the lobby by two men, twitching, unable to stand on his own, causing a scene. I assumed Client was on drugs and I made a game time decision to run out of the hotel without engaging with him. I did not feel safe. I texted Client saying I had to cancel because he was late and I needed to make it to my next appointment. Client then tells me about his medical condition and demands I meet with him because he had already compensated me for my time. I reimbursed Client and asked that he not contact me again. 

*Third meeting: Client created a new profile, a new phone number and arranges to meet without identifying himself. I see Client walking into the lobby and I walk out. Again I text the Client not to contact me.

*Fourth (attempted) meeting: Client created a new profile, a new number. Client identifies himself and I reiterate that I will not meet him. Client writes negative review.

*Fifth meeting: Client has another provider contact me and arranges to meet. Provider tells me it is a private client. Upon arriving, I realize who the Client is. I leave without engaging. Client deletes negative review to make amends. Provider tells me that Client has mental health issues in addition to Parkinson's and that no providers in the Seattle area are willing to meet with this client for similar reasons. 

 

We haven’t met, but I know you by your good reputation, so I’m glad you took the time to respond. 👍

[guru68]

1 hour ago, bottombunktwunk said:

 

Thank you for clarifying - I'm sorry you had that experience.

[+ azdr0710]

Welcome to the forum @bottombunktwunk

[jtwalker]

5 hours ago, bottombunktwunk said:

Figured I should say something about this encounter to clear the air. First of all, I do not discriminate against age, disability, race, weight, etc. As you can see from the rest of my reviews, this was an outlier. That being said, providers have every right to decline meeting if a client makes them feel uncomfortable or unsafe. It has been confirmed from other providers that this particular client has made them feel uncomfortable/unsafe.

So here's my side of the story...

*The client did not disclose his medical condition before meeting.

*First meeting: Client cancels ~30 minutes before appointment because "he did not feel well".  Client offers to compensate me for my lost time so long as I agreed to meet with him again. I accepted the conditions and rescheduled.

*Second meeting: Client is 30+ minutes late. (First thought is "he is flaking") Then I see Client being carried into the lobby by two men, twitching, unable to stand on his own, causing a scene. I assumed Client was on drugs and I made a game time decision to run out of the hotel without engaging with him. I did not feel safe. I texted Client saying I had to cancel because he was late and I needed to make it to my next appointment. Client then tells me about his medical condition and demands I meet with him because he had already compensated me for my time. I reimbursed Client and asked that he not contact me again. 

*Third meeting: Client created a new profile, a new phone number and arranges to meet without identifying himself. I see Client walking into the lobby and I walk out. Again I text the Client not to contact me.

*Fourth (attempted) meeting: Client created a new profile, a new number. Client identifies himself and I reiterate that I will not meet him. Client writes negative review.

*Fifth meeting: Client has another provider contact me and arranges to meet. Provider tells me it is a private client. Upon arriving, I realize who the Client is. I leave without engaging. Client deletes negative review to make amends. Provider tells me that Client has mental health issues in addition to Parkinson's and that no providers in the Seattle area are willing to meet with this client for similar reasons. 

 

It sounds like you handled it very well.

[+ KensingtonHomo]

On 5/17/2022 at 4:37 PM, bottombunktwunk said:

Figured I should say something about this encounter to clear the air. First of all, I do not discriminate against age, disability, race, weight, etc. As you can see from the rest of my reviews, this was an outlier. That being said, providers have every right to decline meeting if a client makes them feel uncomfortable or unsafe. It has been confirmed from other providers that this particular client has made them feel uncomfortable/unsafe.

So here's my side of the story...

*The client did not disclose his medical condition before meeting.

*First meeting: Client cancels ~30 minutes before appointment because "he did not feel well".  Client offers to compensate me for my lost time so long as I agreed to meet with him again. I accepted the conditions and rescheduled.

*Second meeting: Client is 30+ minutes late. (First thought is "he is flaking") Then I see Client being carried into the lobby by two men, twitching, unable to stand on his own, causing a scene. I assumed Client was on drugs and I made a game time decision to run out of the hotel without engaging with him. I did not feel safe. I texted Client saying I had to cancel because he was late and I needed to make it to my next appointment. Client then tells me about his medical condition and demands I meet with him because he had already compensated me for my time. I reimbursed Client and asked that he not contact me again. 

*Third meeting: Client created a new profile, a new phone number and arranges to meet without identifying himself. I see Client walking into the lobby and I walk out. Again I text the Client not to contact me.

*Fourth (attempted) meeting: Client created a new profile, a new number. Client identifies himself and I reiterate that I will not meet him. Client writes negative review.

*Fifth meeting: Client has another provider contact me and arranges to meet. Provider tells me it is a private client. Upon arriving, I realize who the Client is. I leave without engaging. Client deletes negative review to make amends. Provider tells me that Client has mental health issues in addition to Parkinson's and that no providers in the Seattle area are willing to meet with this client for similar reasons. 

 

I'm glad you cleared the air. Sounds like quite the ordeal and very unfair of this person to put you in this position. 

[wsc]

On 5/17/2022 at 4:37 PM, bottombunktwunk said:

Figured I should say something about this encounter to clear the air. First of all, I do not discriminate against age, disability, race, weight, etc. As you can see from the rest of my reviews, this was an outlier. That being said, providers have every right to decline meeting if a client makes them feel uncomfortable or unsafe. It has been confirmed from other providers that this particular client has made them feel uncomfortable/unsafe.

So here's my side of the story...

*The client did not disclose his medical condition before meeting.

*First meeting: Client cancels ~30 minutes before appointment because "he did not feel well".  Client offers to compensate me for my lost time so long as I agreed to meet with him again. I accepted the conditions and rescheduled.

*Second meeting: Client is 30+ minutes late. (First thought is "he is flaking") Then I see Client being carried into the lobby by two men, twitching, unable to stand on his own, causing a scene. I assumed Client was on drugs and I made a game time decision to run out of the hotel without engaging with him. I did not feel safe. I texted Client saying I had to cancel because he was late and I needed to make it to my next appointment. Client then tells me about his medical condition and demands I meet with him because he had already compensated me for my time. I reimbursed Client and asked that he not contact me again. 

*Third meeting: Client created a new profile, a new phone number and arranges to meet without identifying himself. I see Client walking into the lobby and I walk out. Again I text the Client not to contact me.

*Fourth (attempted) meeting: Client created a new profile, a new number. Client identifies himself and I reiterate that I will not meet him. Client writes negative review.

*Fifth meeting: Client has another provider contact me and arranges to meet. Provider tells me it is a private client. Upon arriving, I realize who the Client is. I leave without engaging. Client deletes negative review to make amends. Provider tells me that Client has mental health issues in addition to Parkinson's and that no providers in the Seattle area are willing to meet with this client for similar reasons. 

 

Not only are you very good looking (😋) -and in a delightful clean-cut way- I also love that you can string multiple words together to form complete and lucid sentences, a talent many others of your profession appear to not be so blessed with. If your travels ever bring you back East, please consider a stop in the Washington DC area. I would look forward to making your acquaintance. 

Gentlemen, the line starts here.😉

[Lazarus]

3 hours ago, wsc said:

Not only are you very good looking (😋) -and in a delightful clean-cut way- I also love that you can string multiple words together to form complete and lucid sentences, a talent many others of your profession appear to not be so blessed with. If your travels ever bring you back East, please consider a stop in the Washington DC area. I would look forward to making your acquaintance. 

Gentlemen, the line starts here.😉

As a twice impeached former President once  said “I love the poorly educated”. 

[BuzzLiteQueer]

I have a question for those who have actually met him.  He has posted a new photo (#11) that is a full face view with no obscuring as was done in his other face photos.  Is this photo accurate?  I ask because he does not look like the other photos, albeit obscured and with a different hair color.  Makes me wonder if any of the other photos are accurate or if #11 is accurate.  I'm extremely interested in meeting him so I'd appreciate your comments and thoughts.  DM if you prefer.

[BuzzLiteQueer]

As of today, Saturday May 28, his ad is gone!  😱

Any thoughts as to why?  🤷‍♂️

Definitely not a good sign

[Tandy Newton]

On 5/24/2022 at 3:24 PM, BuzzLiteQueer said:

I have a question for those who have actually met him.  He has posted a new photo (#11) that is a full face view with no obscuring as was done in his other face photos.  Is this photo accurate?  I ask because he does not look like the other photos, albeit obscured and with a different hair color.  Makes me wonder if any of the other photos are accurate or if #11 is accurate.  I'm extremely interested in meeting him so I'd appreciate your comments and thoughts.  DM if you prefer.

Yep, its him.