Jump to content

Escorts exposed for being Anti-black Racists


curiousbynature12
This topic is 1440 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

I agree with many here that preemptively rejecting clients in your ad copy based on race is a revolting practice. I'm usually very hesitant to criticise fellow providers but racial discrimination crosses a line.

 

That said, I also agree with many others here that launching an open season on call-outs is not the way to go about it. It's just too susceptible to abuse. My suggestion is to save it for threads about the providers in question, whenever those threads may arise. That way, one person's accusation can be seen in the context of all others' experiences with the escort. Plus, it might be a good reminder of the work to be done on equality in sex work months from now, when our immediate attention has moved on from these protests and the surrounding discourse.

 

How can someone be under a witch trial for willingly making their views known online? As a professional in my field, I knew since my early 20s that anything I post online could comeback to affect my career and carried my online presence in that fashion. Anyone who exists in this internet age is aware of it as well.

 

As stated many times in this thread, this thread is not to judge one way or another on whether someone is racist. This is to list those who are those being exposed as racist with context this moment.

 

There are so many being exposed for their comments on social media in light of recent events that it doesn't make sense to make individual threads.

 

If you want to chime in on whether that was your experience or not feel free, but discussions about racism and racial preferences among providers is not the purpose of this thread and only serve to derail the topic.

 

There are many not on social media who are unaware of this information, so the transparency helps these clients as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

How can someone be under a witch trial for willingly making their views known online? As a professional in my field, I knew since my early 20s that anything I post online could comeback to affect my career and carried my online presence in that fashion. Anyone who exists in this internet age is aware of it as well.

 

As stated many times in this thread, this thread is not to judge one way or another on whether someone is racist. This is to list those who are those being exposed as racist with context this moment.

 

There are so many being exposed for their comments on social media in light of recent events that it doesn't make sense to make individual threads.

 

If you want to chime in on whether that was your experience or not feel free, but discussions about racism and racial preferences among providers is not the purpose of this thread and only serve to derail the topic.

 

There are many not on social media who are unaware of this information, so the transparency helps these clients as well.

 

Can you explain how exposing someone as racist is not judging whether s/he is racist? The difference seems important to you, as you insistent on it, but that difference is not clear.

 

The reason for individual threads is that each person accused should be evaluated/judged on his own, in fuller context, rather than lumping together different conduct and different statements made by different people under the umbrella label of racist. Failure to donate to a cause, or to denounce police, is different than denying the existence of racism in the conduct of policing. And that's just one example of mixing together different things and calling both racist. What's so wrong with evaluating each person on his/her own on a case by case basis with reference to the specific conduct/statements and context?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with many here that preemptively rejecting clients in your ad copy based on race is a revolting practice. I'm usually very hesitant to criticise fellow providers but racial discrimination crosses a line.

 

That said, I also agree with many others here that launching an open season on call-outs is not the way to go about it. It's just too susceptible to abuse. My suggestion is to save it for threads about the providers in question, whenever those threads may arise.

 

I certainly want to know if the seemingly nice, gay friendly dentist in town has racist posts. I would refuse to go to him & inform my friends. Anywhere I can find such information would be helpful. We should post EVERYWHERE the links/screenshots of escorts who post racist content/advertising. So, I applaud you, DanteV, in your support criticism of racist escorts. We need to escalate the chemotherapy that is medically indicated for society (outing racists is like treatment for a disease). Lets not protect (at all) these racists. All over this forum is exactly the place to out them, not just specific threads of said escorts.

 

Hasn't society been protecting racists and racist attitudes for too long?

 

Black Lives Matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again preference is not racism anymore then me not being into women makes me a mysogonist.

 

Comparing sexual orientation to racial “preferences”, is like comparing apples and oranges.

 

Your sexual orientation (not being into women), is not a preference. It’s a metaphysical result of your biological makeup. (Hence, the whole stance of Homosexuality not being a choice)

 

However, “preferences”, are the result of a microcosm of ideas, beliefs, thoughts, judgments, assumptions, learned from:

 

1.) Environment (your upbringing, etc.)

2.) Influence (religion, school, etc. )

3.) Propaganda (entertainment, media, etc.)

These sources of “learning”, shapes ones preferences and beliefs.

 

Basically, there’s a “why”, to one’s preferences, whether the individual would like to believe that or not.

 

Theres no coincidence that both racial preferences and racism, are both learned behaviors, from the same sources.

 

And truly, they are no different....

I personally like to call racial “preferences”:

 

Racism “lite”, or “Diet” racism.

 

For example, many guys will say that the fact they aren’t into black guys, just out of simple “preference”, but in the back of their minds, the same reasons and beliefs that shape their preferences for dating/sex, are the same reasons racists use to justify:

1.) segregation

2.) employment discrimination

3.) redlining

4.) racial profiling.

 

And usually it all comes out In the wash.

Billy Santoro is a clear example of this.

I’m sure that before his racist tweets were exposed, he was one of those “just a preference”, guys too, as a quick search of his porn will show absolutely no black guy in any scene. No surprise that his “preferences”, transcended to his ideologies on race, overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For context, this is the tweet that got Jake Orion in trouble. Here is also his apology.

 

Dillon Anderson got called out for not using his platform to talk about George Floyd and the protests. He's also shared his preferences on Tumblr in the past, which may also get him in trouble.

 

Jake Orion should have been in “trouble”, far before that. He should have been cancelled for pandering to his “fan”, base and scamming them out of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is 1440 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...