Is Daddysreviews.com Losing Its Touch, Its Flavor ?????

[Guest zipperzone]

>LOVE it. its ok and fine for idiots like you to hire escorts,

>and use us, but as soon as shit hits the fan you have to go

>and demean us. Jesus man, make up your mind.

>convenient tho huh, when your little dick is hard, you want

>us,

 

Actually, my dick is not "little" - I'd say it's about average.

 

>but when you are mad, we are "peddling our asses".

 

I'm not mad - just amused - but you probably can't tell the differance. And what's wrong with saying your peddling you ass around town - it's true isn't it? Or don't you own a bike?

 

>I hope no self respecting escort ever agrees to see you.

 

Don't know why they wouldn't - I'm not bad looking, I pay well, I take baths regularly and I can converse on many subjects.

[Guest zipperzone]

>Oh I get it. You are jealous. That explains ALOT.

>Hey, I would be depressed too, if I were you.

 

Yah right! I'm jealous of YOU - hysterical laughter

 

>I get it.

 

No you don't.

 

You are SO predictable - yank your chain and your off like a flush toilet.

[+ Axiom2001]

>>Is Daddysreviews.com Losing Its Touch, Its Flavor ?????

>

>Let me check; hang on a second.

>

>

>

>Nope, tastes the same to me. Although, for some reason, I no

>longer seem to get that bitter aftertaste.

>

>Btw, Axiom, if you want to get others to post more regularly,

>you might want to ease up on complaining every time someone

>veers off-topic. Encourage the free and natural flow of ideas

>and thoughts, you know? Just a suggestion... ;-)

 

 

 

The "natural flow of ideas and thoughts" can be written in a COMPLETELY NEW THREAD! Why hijack a guy's thread about an issue or topic" that's relatively irrelevant to the initial topic in general!!

And if an individual wants to present those quasi discussions between another, don't do it where it will interrupt the gist of one's thread!

 

I WILL NOT cease mentioning this, and my concern is far from my complaining! I get upset over IMPORTANT facets of life, not from what is presented at one's website or forum, "Mr. Smart Ass!"

[Louis]

Well it appears to me that we have seen a bit of "flavor" in the various strings to the origional post...:-)

I would really like to see everyone meet in the same room, with no one knowing who the other person's handle is....:-)

[+ deej]

Thanks, Dick.

 

What worries me is that there may actually be a system problem but it'll forever go undiscovered because nobody is willing to participate in helping to track it down. <sigh>

 

The software engineer in me sees a limited range of symptoms reported here, but enough to suspect it merits investigation. Unfortunately, it takes participants to do that. I can't be one of them because I don't experience these problems.

 

The last person that actually did participate ended up helping uncover a bug in Internet Explorer that was limited to a specific build/patch level of the browser that Daddy did not have and couldn't possibly have discovered solo. It was incredibly helpful and the problem was corrected.

 

If you have trouble contacting Daddy, feel free to private message me either on the board or through email. Since MY email seems to get through to him, I'll gladly forward anything from you.

[uwsman2]

It's like dealing with 4 year olds here. You guys need a "time out."

[KY_TOP]

>>I wish the board was more interesting. I also wish there

>were

>>more reviews. But, for some reason our lord leader (who

>shall

>>not be questioned, according to deeg) does not comply with

>our

>>wishes. So be it.

>

>If you want to see more reviews, write some. <shrug> That's

>the one thing Daddy can do absolutely nothing about.

 

But he has plenty of reviews. I've now have a review that was accepted 26 days ago and still has not been posted. My last review took over 2 months and 3 e-mails to Daddy to get it posted. I've got 3 more I could review but really WHY? Why put so much time into something to then have to beg for it to be posted?

 

Admit it or not deej...the review process has a problem here!!!!

[KY_TOP]

>Everyone who has followed my advice and written to Daddy about

>review problems has seen the problem resolved (for everyone).

>

 

In my last case, only after over 2 months and 3 e-mails repeatly asking about the review. Same answer, it is in que.

[KY_TOP]

>Never once in all that time have I ever experienced any issue

>neither in submitting a review or the timeliness of when it’s

>published. My two most recent reviews were submitted on July

>12 and published on July 24 without any issue. In fact, both

>reviews appeared on the same date as I requested to Daddy in

>the notes section of the submission form. No fuss, no muss.

>No problem.

 

I've written over 150 reviews. My last review was confirmed as received on August 5th. It has yet to be posted.

[+ deej]

>But he has plenty of reviews. I've now have a review that was

>accepted 26 days ago and still has not been posted. My last

>review took over 2 months and 3 e-mails to Daddy to get it

>posted. I've got 3 more I could review but really WHY? Why

>put so much time into something to then have to beg for it to

>be posted?

>

>Admit it or not deej...the review process has a problem

>here!!!!

 

Let's see, you posted a review and it got published. Doesn't seem like there's a problem.

 

You seem to be complaining that it took a while. There are many reasons for that, many of them explained in the site's FAQ.

 

A problem is when something doesn't work as designed. If you submit a review and it does NOT get published, that's a problem.

 

If it doesn't happen fast enough for you that's an issue with expectations, not a problem with the system. Even when Hooboy ran the site it often took 30 days or longer to get a review published. And people complained then too.

 

There have been issues with the system and gradually, as people have worked with Daddy to uncover them, they have been fixed. I'm not aware of any pending issues at this time.

[KY_TOP]

>If it doesn't happen fast enough for you that's an issue with

>expectations, not a problem with the system.

 

What is an acceptable time frame. 2 months, 1 month, 2 weeks?

 

>Even when Hooboy

>ran the site it often took 30 days or longer to get a review

>published. And people complained then too.

 

I never had a review to take 30 days with Hooboy, even when he was having one of his notorious laptop issues. Most were posted within 3-7 days. Never had one go over 2 weeks unless they had over 10 reviews and had to wait for the 30 day seperation.

 

>There have been issues with the system and gradually, as

>people have worked with Daddy to uncover them, they have been

>fixed. I'm not aware of any pending issues at this time.

 

hummmm

[Louis]

Well I can tell you that I had a few reviews that were not published by the origional HooBoy site. I did have one published by the present site. I just followed the instructions. I will eventually post another review, but that will be when I see another escort.

[+ ArVaGuy]

>>Never once in all that time have I ever experienced any

>issue

>>neither in submitting a review or the timeliness of when

>it’s

>>published. My two most recent reviews were submitted on

>July

>>12 and published on July 24 without any issue. In fact,

>both

>>reviews appeared on the same date as I requested to Daddy in

>>the notes section of the submission form. No fuss, no muss.

>

>>No problem.

>

>I've written over 150 reviews. My last review was confirmed as

>received on August 5th. It has yet to be posted.

>

>

 

And all I can say to rebut that is that my last set of reviews only took 12 days to post. They were submitted on July 12 and published on July 24. A reasonable time frame IMHO. I don't exactly get all geeked up to see my reviews get published either. And I don't think I am getting any special treatment either since my reviews are submitted under a different user name than my postings on this board.

 

Wait let me correct my statement. Only once have I had a review take weeks and weeks to be published. It took about six weeks to get published as I recall. That was over a MER during the early start up of the site when they appeared to have rushed it launch before working the bugs out.

 

What’s with all the impatience amongst some as to when a submission gets published? I really for the life of me don’t understand it. I will reiterate I have never had any single issue in trying to submit a review nor in an excessive length of time for it to post on this site under Hooboy or the current management.

 

I can accept that some technical glitches occur from time to time with any automated process. I work with enough databases to know they get hungry from time to time and decide to eat the data rather than store it. But 98% of the glitches that my own work experience has demonstrated tend to be caused by user error than the systems. And much of that is due to not following the instructions posted on our registration sites.

[Rick Munroe]

>The "natural flow of ideas and thoughts" can be written in a

>COMPLETELY NEW THREAD!

 

Too much work. :o

 

>Why hijack a guy's thread about an

>issue or topic" that's relatively irrelevant to the initial

>topic in general!!

 

Because it's fun.

 

>I WILL NOT cease mentioning this

 

OK, I guess every board needs its own Topic Nazi.

 

"No posts for you!"

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/e/e5/Sein_soup_nazi.jpg

[Rick Munroe]

>I would really like to see everyone meet in the same room,

>with no one knowing who the other person's handle is....:-)

 

That wouldn't be fair to me. Everyone would immediately guess who's the hairy guy in booty jeans.

[+ deej]

>>If it doesn't happen fast enough for you that's an issue

>with

>>expectations, not a problem with the system.

>

>What is an acceptable time frame. 2 months, 1 month, 2 weeks?

 

Acceptable to who? ;-) It's clear nothing short of immediate gratification is acceptable to you so I guess you're asking what's acceptable to Daddy. You'll have to ask him.

 

>I never had a review to take 30 days with Hooboy, even when he

>was having one of his notorious laptop issues. Most were

>posted within 3-7 days. Never had one go over 2 weeks unless

>they had over 10 reviews and had to wait for the 30 day

>seperation.

 

Lucky you! I sure did.

 

I had one published in something like 2 days once and was utterly stunned because that had never happened before. (The surprise factor is why I remember it.) I was one of the first reviewers to have that funky little "credible reviewer" icon on reviews, so you know I've published a few of 'em over the years. They always took a while.

[+ ArVaGuy]

Is This Thread Dead and has It Lost its Flavor?

 

Just asking the obvious.

 

 

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/beating-a-dead-horse.gif

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/PappyDeadhorse.jpg

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/AnotherDeadHorse.jpg

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/DeadhorseDil.jpg

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/DolceIceCream.jpg

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/BaconIceCream.jpg

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/BrooklynIceCreamFactory.jpg

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Fun%20Pics/Thissilcone.jpg

[+ ArVaGuy]

>>>If it doesn't happen fast enough for you that's an issue

>>with

>>>expectations, not a problem with the system.

>>

>>What is an acceptable time frame. 2 months, 1 month, 2

>weeks?

>

>Acceptable to who? ;-) It's clear nothing short of immediate

>gratification is acceptable to you so I guess you're asking

>what's acceptable to Daddy. You'll have to ask him.

>

>>I never had a review to take 30 days with Hooboy, even when

>he

>>was having one of his notorious laptop issues. Most were

>>posted within 3-7 days. Never had one go over 2 weeks unless

>>they had over 10 reviews and had to wait for the 30 day

>>seperation.

>

>Lucky you! I sure did.

>

>I had one published in something like 2 days once and was

>utterly stunned because that had never happened before. (The

>surprise factor is why I remember it.) I was one of the first

>reviewers to have that funky little "credible reviewer" icon

>on reviews, so you know I've published a few of 'em over the

>years. They always took a while.

 

 

 

Was there not a policy during Hooboy's time that there was 10 day separation between reviews for an escort? Also, guys with 10 or more reviews there was a 30 separation? I seem to remember that from wayback in the early days.

[KY_TOP]

>

>Acceptable to who? ;-) It's clear nothing short of immediate

>gratification is acceptable to you so I guess you're asking

>what's acceptable to Daddy. You'll have to ask him.

 

I never said I expected an immediate response, but yes in excess of a month I consider excessive. Why do you have to be such an *** about things. Then you wonder why people stop posting or submitting reviews.

 

I actually get no gratifaication from writing reviews anymore. I do think it is cool if someone meets a great escort because of something I have said or don't get scammed or misled by someone they, and I should have passed on hiring. I thought that was the prupose to begin with. I've had escorts Rentboy or MER ads be gone before a review about them gets posted.

 

And I have followed your constant advice about e-mailing Daddy. It really does not help in many cases.

[KY_TOP]

>Was there not a policy during Hooboy's time that there was 10

>day separation between reviews for an escort? Also, guys with

>10 or more reviews there was a 30 separation? I seem to

>remember that from wayback in the early days.

 

If you read my response I think your question has been answered.

[+ deej]

>Why do you have to be such an ***

 

That word is allowed. You don't need to hold off on the name-calling. I'm used to it. I don't think it's fair, but I'm used to it.

 

You stated: What is an acceptable time frame.

 

I asked: Acceptable to who?

 

It's a fair question! (And one you haven't answered.)

 

I can guarantee my Aunt Shirley would give a different answer than the cashier at the grocery store or the cab driver I had last week who didn't think ANYTHING was acceptable. Acceptable to who? Who sets the "acceptability level"?

 

>I actually get no gratifaication from writing

>reviews anymore.

 

Neither do I. That's a different discussion entirely.

 

>And I have followed your constant advice about

>e-mailing Daddy. It really does not help in many cases.

 

That's a fair observation. It's also completely useless because it gives absolutely nothing to take action on.

[Guest zipperzone]

>You stated: What is an acceptable time frame.

>

>I asked: Acceptable to who?

>

>It's a fair question! (And one you haven't answered.)

>

>I can guarantee my Aunt Shirley would give a different answer

>than the cashier at the grocery store or the cab driver I had

>last week who didn't think ANYTHING was acceptable. Acceptable

>to who? Who sets the "acceptability level"?

 

I would think that "acceptable" would mean a timeframe that any reasonable person would call acceptable (and please don't ask me to define reasonable)

 

What I don't understand is why would it take 30 days to get a review published when on most days there are only 3 or 4 new reviews. I could understand it if we were being bogged down with them, but we're not.

 

And as for your Aunt Shirley - would she really think ANY publishing of reviews was acceptable? :-)

[AdamSmith]

>That wouldn't be fair to me. Everyone would immediately guess

>who's the hairy guy in booty jeans.

 

You could come in a burkha!

 

(...Anyone dare to touch that one? )

[+ Lucky]

That's well said, and I appreciate your remarks. Many things have happened over the years to contribute to the way the message center devleops. We have lost some great posters, many just tired of it, many moved on for other reasosn, and many were turned away by the crass attitude that management, and by that I mean daddy and deej, have taken towards those who had complaints. They simply couldn't give a shit what you think and if you stop coming here, they don't care. It is simple as that.

I keep coming here in spite of that. I have met Daddy and I liked him. But he could give deej a good swat once in a while and he doesn't choose to. So he has to take the blame for that, or so I think. I keep coming here because there are some great guys who post some interesting stuff. They can put up with deej acting like some kind of puppet king and get a good laugh out of his pomposity.

 

I keecoming in the hopes that I will learn something or stir up a good discussion. Yes, it still happens once in awhile. But even I get tired of some of the really trite crap that certain posters consider worthwhile. And you know somethin? I'll bet they think the same thing of me! So it's a diverse crowd, I got used to it, and if you keep coming, you will too.