wsc

Thank you so much! Now I have a strong urge for hot dogs and buns. I don't know why.

Not usually my "type" and don't know about his "handy" skills, but I find this lad almost irresistibly cute.

Attitude is completely unattractive.

On that scale, I'd probably have to raid my IRA.

I'd be degraded enough just being topped by Doogie Howser.

Is the watch on his d*ck there so he knows when to say, "Time's up!"?

Handsome face, muscular body, nice chest, great nipples, big arms, lovely pits, gorgeous smile.😛 Then ... he turns around.😬 Why, why, why?

Reading some of the posts in this thread made me check to be sure I hadn't wandered into Friday Funnies.

Did I over-share? Me bad!

This, along with the Tucker Dumpster, are the two best things to happen for journalism since the Pentagon Papers and the Spotlight expose of the Boston archdiocese. Tits on a boar are of more use than either of these fonts of foolishness. Good riddance!

Beware! In the wild, this is a trap laid for the notorious and very voracious purple-penis-eater. [Reportedly, sometimes also known as WSC.]

You have a very diverse palate for men. Haven't seen any of these gentlemen, but on looks alone, my money's on DTX_Jock. Bon Appetit!

Once, at a Command Performance in London, Dame Edna got into the box with the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall (Charles and Camilla). After some small talk, an usher came in and handed Dame Edna a note. She read the note, then stood and said, "I'm sorry, I've got to go. They've found me a better seat." First time I saw this, I spit out whatever I was drinking. I think she would have liked that.

So long, Possums! And thanks for the laughs!

Gives me an idea for a new dance group: The Radio City Music Hall Rickettes! (Or has that already been done?)

If a sailor on liberty in New York City commits a robbery, assault, or murder, he will be charged with a violation of the New York Criminal Code and stand trial in a New York courtroom where all his constitutional rights will be in effect and protected. If, on the other hand, the sailor mouths off to an officer on base or aboard ship, he will be charged under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the legal code applied to all US armed forces, and under which constitutional rights are generally not applicable. The UCMJ was approved by Congress pursuant to constitutional provisions empowering congress to make rules for regulating the "land and naval forces of the United States," and recognizing the need for a greater degree of discipline and cohesion in the services as opposed to the general society. In a middle case, if the sailor kills a shipmate on base or aboard ship, he will be charged under the UCMJ and prosecuted under its rules. Courts have consistently ruled that the UCMJ, although doing so differently, provides the accused with all the applicable protections of the constitution. There are mixed opinions as to the accuracy of that assertion. How a service member's constitutional rights are addressed depends on who is charging him and under what system he is charged, state or federal penal codes, or the UCMJ. Hence, military justice is to justice as military music is to music.

Some people are slow learners, insisting on doing it the hard way. (No pun intended.)

"The First Amendment applies differently to members of the military." To see this in action, consider the consequences to a soldier of offering a different view of a superior officer's order instead of obeying it. The First Amendment will not be his shield at the court-martial. As the sub captain in Crimson Tide (played by Gene Hackman) said. "We're here to protect democracy, not practice it." And from the old adage, Military justice is to justice as military music is to music. It marches to its own tune.

It's always sad when the ears turn out to the longest thing he has.

Fascinating account, and quite well written. Thank you.

I can't see his insignia, but assume he's the Sergeant-at-Arms.

I find all this talk of concrete "hard" to understand.

But I'm pretty sure he's good at counting.

I don't doubt it and that angle had occurred to me, as well, reminding me that although you can't sell it, you can make a gift of it. Which reminds me of my wonderment about prostitution laws. Why is it illegal to sell that which you can give away for free? We now return to our scheduled program, already in progress.

Oh, My! So many boxes to check.