Gar1eth

In his newer pictures, he's obviously still muscular but not as defined as before. Don't get me wrong. I still think he looks great. But it looks as if he isn't working out as much. I'm sorry about his demons. Gman

You may be correct. However the best known escorts over the years have been known more for their consistencies. And where reports on their activities have differed, in most cases these have been due to -hmm how to put it-"expanded offerings" rather than restricting their activities with clients. Gman

Even in Hooboy's days, I think many of us were (and still are now since Daddy has taken over) suspicious when a provider has only, or mostly, 1st time reviewers. First time reviewers are not necessarily fake-obviously-but there are escorts who have had multiple reviews, all by first time reviewers. Sometimes having many 1st time reviewers could just be the luck of the draw. And the reviews are all real. But in other cases.... Jimjim seems to be a case of the former-i.e. he has mostly first time reviewers, but they've given a true description of him-although a bit inconsistent. I think one reviewer said he was versatile when all others say he is a top. And I think one reviewer may have indicated passionate kissing where others indicate dry. Also I think some talked about boyfriend experiences-whether they used those words or not. And while I've never had a boyfriend, if my boyfriend only gave me dry kisses, we wouldn't be boyfriends for very long. Gman

His ad is back. But he's changed the ad copy, and it's confusing now. He lists that he's 'verse' in the body of the ad. But on the list of things he's into, "anal" has been taken off. Gman

I'm glad you found that. I tried image searching using my mobile Chrome browser but didn't find anything (you have to take a screenshot. Upload the screenshot to a web server like Dropbox. Then use the link from Dropbox in Chrome). While my way works sometimes, it has faults. It has often failed me on people I am sure are scammers. Gman

I wonder if this ad is TGTBT. Why would this guy list himself as having a Defined Physique? If there's a large discrepancy in the ad like that, I'm always suspicious. Gman

Also unless it's a language problem, I'm always suspicious when descriptions don't match the pictures. In this case, he says he has a Defined physique. Most would call him muscular. Gman

Does he meet your exacting standards, @jjkrkwood? Gman

His ad says the best way to reach him is to text him. If your message was an email, maybe he doesn't intend to answer it. I don't agree with that. But maybe he doesn't answer emails. Gman

I might have been willing to splurge on him too. I still haven't fixed the catalytic converter in my car. So I have a bit of money. But just as well he's a strict top since I do need to get the car fixed. Also, for me at least, that one picture of him as a dom is off putting-I'm not into being submissive. Gman

CBS Channel 11 Dallas Weatherman Scott Padgett got him some guns!!! Gman

He's had other names in the past and has been using picture #1. since at least 2003 or 2004 (when I hired him for an overnight) but probably longer than that. He's had some good reviews from Daddys if I'm remembering correctly. We didn't hit it off that well. It's not that he scammed me. He just seemed disinterested. Gman

While not in the know, it does happen sometimes. But in the large majority of the cases, fake profiles, such as Rentmen ads, are non-police fakes-just people trying to run scams to get money. Gman

If curling can be a sport, anything can be a sport. Gman

I like cute buttocks-but can do without the hole? What's Ram? Gman

His Rentmen ad dates from about a year after I stopped hiring. While I'm not fond of those picture of his showing a gaping a-hole (or really pictures of anyone showing gaping holes), I really wish he had advertised a year or two earlier because there's a good chance I would have tried to hire him. Gman

I was watching a DVR'ed Shark Tank from last Sunday with my Mom tonight. There was a teenage entrepreneur with an idea for a pocket in a sock. There are other socks with pockets in them. But according to the young entrepreneur, her socks have larger pockets than the competition. Laurie and Daymond decided to bankroll her. Is it weird that my mind immediately started think about ecdysiasts? I was thinking these socks might be a perfect thing to hold their phones and money. https://wisepocketproducts.com/ Gman

Any kinks-I mean links? Gman

Gman

It was the best I could do. But if you can find a better one, I'm all for it. Gman

Don't forget his "greag (sic) sense of humor." Gman

And now a song tribute to those tight jeans!! Gman

Obviously I'm not a lawyer. But what I'm thinking is that the terms of service for the apps probably state 18 as minimum age. Discounting that violation-then it seems to me that talking to the person online depends more on state rules because using the apps could be considered a substitute for texting. And if legal age is, for example 16 in Washington state, then in general with some exceptions, it should be legal to discuss things. On the other hand, knowingly talking to a 16 year old for hooking up is not something I want to do. So I'd block them. Gman

Even Chris Hansen can be toast!! (Spoiler-old news in case anyone isn't aware) https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2354411/amp/Kristyn-Caddell-Former-mistress-To-Catch-A-Predator-star-Chris-Hansen-speaks-affair.html Gman Obviously that's happened to several of us. The one guy I seriously considered about meeting before he told me his true age was, luckily for me, legal in Washington state, but I think if the same scenario had happened in Texas, he would have been underage. Gman

In general if the session went well, I think just about the only time I'd complain is if the escort tried to charge for those extra minutes than for the original agreed upon fee/time. Gman