SirBillybob

How exhausting it must be to have to count heads and venue floor distribution by gender while ponying up CAD$36 to do so and cutting into party fun time, pouring over a smartphone spreadsheet app. It’s really taking one for the team. Polytechnique.

That annoyance or boredom by even a tribe’s single individual is optionally a response with respect to this thought-provoking post induces the heartbreaking realization that the type of coalition-building needed to support all diversity and to shield all disenfranchised from mean attacks still has some way to go.

This is like, of all 4 eateries within a radius of a few steps of my home near the Quartier des Spectacles, only one offers the poutine I like while another serves decent frites. But the outrageous gall of a commercial infrastructure that fails to consider all of my requirements and preferences across all related venues. Although I suppose it’s good to know there’s an option to attend a venue according to performance guys that you categorize as female in one context, femme in another.

I haven’t had occasion to interact extensively with all people components of the acronym string that distinguishes a broad subgroup from the limited conceptual binaries of male / female and heterosexual / nonheterosexual, etc, and I haven’t experienced much challenge regarding my own categorization as a gay cisgender male, but for some reason I do feel a fellowship with the totality of subcategories within the aforementioned extended acronym. I don’t fully grasp why as I haven’t felt pushed into such an attitude or identity consolidation, and I harbour no antipathy towards the shrinking proportion of folks, fellow humans, excluded from the acronym. I think that it would confuse and subvert this identification and its mysterious value if I were to hierarchically stratify my sense of affiliation according to the various representations within whatever the acronym represents, or get caught up in the intersectional complexity of gender identity and sexual orientation. This doesn’t suggest that I’m always capable of resisting the unfortunate human tendency of ‘othering’ with respect to some aspects of mankind. That said, it does appear that heterosexuality alone does not dictate exclusion from the broadening spectrum of whatever best fits what any individual knows they truly are, but that reality doesn’t nullify the fact that not all heterosexuals are considered equally entitled to a claim to said orientation. Homosexual folks, in contrast, are not deprived of their orientation legitimacy, albeit at greater risk for proclaiming it, as it satisfies the criteria of problematic ‘othering’, the central core of whatever the “mean girls” colloquialism signifies.

New. An older structure was torn down for it. Oddly, the design rendering associated with it is way off. Looks like San Antonio location. Whoever constructed the photo cluster must have entered it incorrectly … Untru by Hilton.

I know of him but never interacted. Agree his hiatus was extensive. He was working at Campus Thursday.

Separate profile issue not the age verification one … today a day of firsts … subscribing to an OF dude, had been steered there thru a ‘scort platform. Both entities turned out fake with blend of faux stunning and obviously less attractive representations. I usually clue in better. Learned lesson, only $15. Time wasted with the guy: about 75 minutes communicating; that’s more aggravating. Back to Brazil it is.😆

Ahah … maybe cuz I wasn’t logged in and age verification could not be accessed thru my profile.

Not that I objected, but first time I had to enter my date of birth to enter an Onlyfans profile from a Linktree list. I think American.

My Movie 43.mov

Sounds hot even if suggestive of the confounding product ‘Shrinkflation’ era. Not being a size queen, I’d trade off length and girth for uninflated rates.

To put it clangingly, turning over a new Leif. 🥰

This is so complex because while you reference PrEP there is also the consideration of TasP, U=U, type of sex, condom use, prevention mix’n’match, diagnostic latency, etc. There are now so many variables that come into play regarding the question of the degree to which known HIV poz status non-disclosure truly vitiates consent, interpretation and variability among jurisdictions can surely be expected as legal implications catch up with HIV prevention and management evolution. In many cases the risk of cracking open one’s skull due to slipping on a carelessly left banana peel on the multi-level brothel stairs is greater than acquiring infection from the CSW.

I think this is an important topic and you raise an interesting point about criminalization and culpability, as well as highlight the range of perspectives about it. However … Read their guidelines and implicit disclaimer. First of all, there is no imperative for a third party ad site to vet advertisers’ possible transmissible disease status. The clearly stated MO behind the dropdown menu is to convey that health-related communication is encouraged and is hoped to be deemed normative. To think that such messaging leaves an entity open to litigation is an idea that slides a bit up the scale of paradoxical absurdity. The antithesis of their approach is don’t talk don’t tell. If the field is empty or the ticked choice is to not answer or is unknown the fact that it's clearly optionally a completable menu facilitates an inquiry without the challenge of having to legitimize opening up a conversation. Such communication is not contractually obligatory on the part of the third party. They are setting up one aspect of health protection strategy. The pharmacy or ASO is not responsible or liable for the degree to which condom purchase or distribution leads to actual usage.

I think it’s almost a type of conceptual “clanging”, though not pathological. Like if the hotel artisanal toiletries included a rope soap that then could be considered employable on the king size headboard with one’s hire. I didn’t for one minute think that any posted comment was attributable to any fuddy-duddy who might be arbitrarily imagining the swinging 60s as their period of adult male peaking, but had assumed the Time Machine would not just be propelling my sorry old ass to the past while holding a device that might trigger a Cagney & Lacey SWAT team activation. 😏

I’m gutted if he isn’t available now.

Aaah, was it after all a lucre-pincher for which the term Achilles’ heel was coined?

So … examples of some of the most retired men as per the OP’s inquiry.

But Oh, I just want a remote control for my curtains to match my carpet.

Back to the billion dollar premise …

Nobody made light of any historical tragedy, however close to home, by virtue of a random selected date. My graveside experiences in 1985 Toronto were not particularly silent and my erotic experiences not condomless. The proposition put forward is surreal and defies the characteristic of being realistic. Fantasizing Waikiki Beach 1941 between Thanksgiving and Christmas for a hot servicemen gangbang, in the context of the deliberately silly premise would, similarly, not represent being tone deaf.

Or, “thank you” … YMMV

1985? I would want … insist … that all the prospective encounters convincingly treat me as if I’m all shiny and new, like a virgin fucked for the very first time.

Where there’s smoke there’s fire. If a subset of escorts on a chat site subtly or overtly self-describe as the best and most skilled and attractive options, consumers within the same arena will naturally tend to comment on such variables with respect to the broader constituency of escorts. It’s not necessarily shameless self-promotion because it’s just biz, but it does inherently lend itself to hyperbole at either end of the spectrum of subjective perception and critical appraisal of appeal, particularly within a monetary transactional context. Rarely do we read, “Ya know, that fella looks like he’d be an OK bet for exchanging cash to get my rocks off.”