SirBillybob

No, these encounters don’t occur in a geopolitical context of hyper medicalization and pharmacology. These dudes are not accessing and consuming PDE5i meds or combo IM prostaglandin / papaverine / phentolamine. But they belong to a minority of men with autonomously accessible erectile reliability fundamentally irrespective of interactional context. You will also see here periodic claims of escorts posting on the board that they possess such membership.

Like you, I would roll with less than optimal penile tumescence, particularly with a regular with whom enjoyment had historically occurred. I also avoid conflating the term performance with traditional bona fide erectile function because tumescence is only truly reflective of subjective sexual arousal on my side of the equation. I wouldn’t be capable of a performative erection, without all of the elements prompting true arousal, if my life depended on it. The only logical reason to use performative nomenclature with an escort is the reality that their erectile function is potentially out of sync with what promotes physical male sexual arousal in general, or specific to their arousal template. Few things are more anathema to their erectile potential than the requirement that they simulate true arousal yet sustain punitive consequences for failure to deliver. Binding physical erection to monetary compensation is just one more way of ensuring a disconnect between two functional contexts, one naturalistic, the other obligatory. It doesn’t bode well for sexual health. Grousing about inconsistent capacity to perform, without attempting to grasp the complexity of male sexual response, is nothing short of childish. Again, my view is framed within a regular repeat situation. If a new one off and no overt erection meeting the traditional threshold for various activities occurs, I won’t have actually initially dictated erectile requirements. It’s exploratory. Some guys are better at meeting my requirements for an exciting sexual encounter that doesn’t demand their penile arousal compared to others whose erectile capability is not obligatory but occurs notwithstanding, is invariant due to unique factors that guarantee consistent tumescence. But I want to avoid the problematic own goal of missing out on a good match in which erections are not uniformly on tap. I never suggest or insist on chemical intervention. Many of my regulars have consistent robust erections. Could be serendipity. I wouldn’t myself take personal credit for it, and they are not contractually bound to it. Emancipated from a demand they might actually finesse other valued components of erotic interaction.

Gaseous lying if denial of hearsay representing fact. Hot stuff in bed if pants on fire. Gaslighting if attempts to explain gaseous combustion as perceiver’s figmental mirage.

Haven’t seen it yet. Will likely load it on my device for some imminent lengthy international flights. Curtis is also so good in the episode ‘The Fishes’ in the series The Bear. S2Ep6. Won best guest actress comedy series Emmy. Not to be missed.

Hahahah … not.

418: a teapot permanently refusing to brew coffee, if the emphasis is worthless rip-off subscription scams.

The musical?

Apparently you need to telephone to access the actual address of the appointment, but it also seems, if I’ve got this right, that the incall rendezvous rooms are under one roof. Is that so? After you’ve been initiated / “broken in” the first time does this mean you’ll automatically know the location for subsequent bookings irrespective of the escort? Also, if they won’t share a face photo prior to booking is it possible that once they trust and value you as a client that you will at least have access to the catalogue of escorts and face pics even if it’s not digitally transferable to your own device so as to prevent you from sharing them elsewhere?

I never heard such. I only listened to an interview in which MD shared his father had danced at Campus. I know the mother’s name only but wouldn’t post either parent’s true name.

I think somebody somewhere in Kansas named Sam already has her claws in Viglundur.

Abandoned buildings old port. U r guay. 😉

I’ve seen his gyrating bare behind a few feet away from my backroom cubicle seating by peering over the buff shoulder of dancers more to my liking. A few months ago I went up to him using his birth name to propose private cubicle time and he stated a 50% upcharge per song. I responded I’d think about it. I might have gone through with ticking the box for the usual release outcome but recalled that in his first year I truncated it after the first $20 because the first few minutes were startlingly offputting. I’m sure he has modified his style, though. You can walk into a setting and get guys in Brazil just as attractive, or more so IMO with faces more handsome, for full sex for the price of 2-ish songs. Their images are not insertable here. I can see his overall appeal to many here, though, also seeing as he has infused some of his erotica with elements of comedy. However, I’ll never understand the cliché upreg in value add and cost predicated on filmed sex accessible in the public domain, for any escort. I would only categorize it as a particular advertising component and the trickle down into comfort with erotica production doesn’t correlate well with physical attractiveness. I don’t mean to conflate fashion modelling with erotica but he was brought up and there is a brief bathing costume runway walk clip of some three years ago. If he showed up at my door with a packet of DareTM crackers he’d be welcome to munch on them in my bed but I wouldn’t go out of my way otherwise. What I really want to know is whether I took dances from his father decades ago as he evidently (from horse’s mouth) worked at Campus in his day.

Will it be adequately settled before page 5?

One of the reasons I like Brazil as a septuagenarian is that an early evening somewhat vibrant gay nightlife is accessible as needed and on demand when in my northern city I’d just be another old guy stretching out a sedate ‘happy hour’ with age peers or younger alcohol dependents. I also love early morning starts there. But let’s not go overboard here with discussions about Brazil. 😉

Where, so far, is the meandering into radical feminism? I’d say that Debbie Downer more closely represents the commentary zeitgeist.

Interesting, but not many degrees of separation in terms of sexual fluidity from last season’s Leo Woodall character dating Tonya’s assistant Portia and seen screwing one of the killer gays. I see Lochlan as a very sophisticated brat without the moustache twirling, but a symptom of family dynamics.

Are we watching the same show? I detect no evidence whatsoever of Lochlan demonstrating an eroticized fixation on his older brother and I’ve seen all their interactions. In fact, the nuanced en suite bathroom scene where he looks away only when the door is shut can explain Lochlan’s subsequent manifestations of antipathy towards Saxon through passive attentiveness yet muted refusal to communicate beyond patient forbearance listening to the latter’s goals for him, and by manipulatively heightening his sister’s antipathy towards Saxon. As if, “I see you and what a curiosity you (all) are?” Saxon’s familial ally is his enabler mother; his tasteless comments crack her up. His father manipulatively uses ego candy to get him to capitulate to sacrifice his device. Saxon is easily wrapped around most others’ fingers as a harmless innocuous pussy. One has to be smarter than a sack of hammers to strategically assess sexual interest by “forgetting” to close the loo door followed by setting up wash-the-gay-away camp.

That’s the fun of it. It’s like being randomly assigned to a debate position. Perhaps we should buy into the notion that evading prediction is superior, but then subsequently having an opinion comes across as disingenuous. BTW, what does “armchair” mean and what criterion would eliminate it as a descriptor?

At first glance I thought you wrote 6”.

I think it’s clever so far and these seemingly facile resolutions represent the apparently innocuous calm, sometimes sea receding and exposing more than low tide, prior to a tsunami onslaught. After all, the greatest muting of tension, now that we have a few hours behind us, has occurred with a late-breaking character prior to the gunfire sequence to leave the door open to main character victim identity. Lochlan is gender and sexuality curious, including intersex, an observer. Other references to gender fluidity and stratification have occurred. He’s the most interesting character not because of the reductionist view of homosexual potential (he could eradicate Saxon’s bravado demeanour with a look and send him on a cliché mission while raising overly simplistic audience assumptions about MSM lust) but because he can subtly and manipulatively disarm both siblings while on the face of it having conflict imposed on him wrt choosing an alliance with one or the other. He can point-blank cross a line with impunity staring down his naked brother even following cues to cease and desist, then asking his sister about her virginity. Piper cannot meet the challenge of resenting both brothers equally although Lochlan broke a confidence while also acting as conduit for his brother's intrusiveness. He can do temple and pool, generate sexual topic anxiety either saying nothing or pushing the envelope, while exacerbating the tension between older sibs. This deflects from familial pressures to choose the Alma Mater of two female members vs two male members. He sits between the two gender ambiguous staff about whom he had asked his father a sex ed question, that cloak his mother in her dream … protection forecasting? The first Ep3 line is his “this is what it looks like before a tsunami”. On his device he comments on a tsunami victim paralytically frozen in place. Lochlan is pressured to have sex before he dies because it will assuage Saxon’s anxiety about his brother’s ambiguity. He never affirms the goal, rattling Saxon’s faux alpha confidence. Saxon's sense of self, of validation, hinges on a mini-me fantasy. Chelsea is a survivor and man eater, two brushes with mortality but she holds the cards interactionally, taming Rick, as Tonya held them financially while treated poorly, and her demise would be too repetitive. Where death offers the greatest resolution systemically, other than the more obvious usual suspects’ “just desserts”, is Lochlan croaking because it solves a pathological bind. It needn’t be intentional malicious targeting. It would be divisive because not everybody will view him having reached a shit-disturbing behavioural threshold, and his coping style is a function of cray-cray family dynamics. He superficially does what’s expected but there’s a price for consuming a protein drink in just the right way and without slouching, and it may be his family enduring his eradication while never having recognized he both provocatively heats up and balances the system. This might mean Tim will have wiggled out of his business crisis. The three women mirror disorganized alliance dynamics but cancel each other out as demise candidates and can go separate ways, whereas families are bound. Lochlan’s triangulation is more profound. The lily pad pond is his tranquillity tank.

At least we now know why Sandra Bernhard has been trapped for decades in a white lab coat.

I’m hooked merely reading the first two Preface paragraphs in a sample.

She could hardly bite his head off.

Didn’t at all see that ending coming because he had mostly along his lengthy writing trajectory steered away from that particular kind of backdrop.