Monarchy79

Is this your philosophy on how you operate in life?

Are there any sexual acts that you do perform with men? Are you 100% celibate? Are you a virgin? Are you permanently abstinent? there are variables you left out, that could allow me to comprehensively answer your question.

My point precisely. Unfortunately many people in these comments truly believe they are having sex with straight men, because the guys simply said they were straight.

I’m in full agreement with you. And part of what you said is the foundation of my point. As a bisexual man, you can fuck women you are not attracted to, because (IMO) you are biologically wired to fuck women. I believe that a gay man can fuck men he is not attracted to because he is biologically ally wired to fuck men. I don’t believe a 100% straight man can thoroughly fuck a man as he’s not biologically wired to do so.

I understand sexual fetishes quite clearly. However, stating that something is a fetish, doesn’t exonerate it from being wrong, inappropriate, or even illegal. Participating in snuff films is considered a fetish for many…. Does that indicate that it’s “acceptable”?

Sir, You’re bisexual. I was referring to gay men having the ability to give mercy fucks to woman. if a 100% gay man has a pussy put in his face, he’s not easily diving in.

I’ll send you a direct message.

Not necessarily. thees a difference between wanting to hire men for the satisfaction of sex, vs. hunting for a specific type of man that’s destitute and in serious need of the money (i.e. hiring a precessional escort, vs., cruising the streets for corner crack hoes). Augusts message came off as if he “gets off” from hiring straight men who are in need of the money (whether it’s from poverty, unemployment homelessness, or some addiction), in order to get a “high” from the things her can get them to do for the cash…. That’s what makes his comment cringey.

The way you described everything is quite cringey. Is your turn on the actual men? Or the satisfaction of exploiting someone who needs the money?

I’ll counter that by asking if you’ve ever had sex with a man you’re not attracted to? We all have (mercy fucks). However, ask yourself have you (or will you) give those same mercy fucks to women? The answer for most will be “no.” Being attracted to someone and being BIOLOGICALLY WIRED to be attracted to a specific gender are two different things (which many people in the comments can’t seem to comprehend.)

It also needs to be clarified that identifying as straight, and being straight are two different things. I’m sure there are plenty of escorts falsely defining themselves as “straight”, simply to appear to the fantasies of some potential clients.

There’s a difference between someone not being personally attracted to you, and someone not being biologically attracted to your entire gender. A gay escort may not be personally attracted to you, but they can still be biologically inclined to perform. A truly straight escort cannot do that.

That’s true for many of those who hire escorts. But at least those gay escorts can perform expected services. I’ll never understand hiring some straight guy to “muscle worship” or to suck on his limp dick, while he looks at the client in disgust.

Desiring a man who is confirmed to never fully be attracted to you is nonsensical. But I think the bigger issue is WHY so many gay men chase self-proclaimed straight guys. I’ll dive a bit deeper by making this observation: The straight men they desire are never effeminate straight men, soft straight men or cuckolds. This observation leads me to believe that the desire to have a straight man, is connected with an idea of “authentic masculinity”, which many gay men believe cannot be achieved by another gay man. What’s unfortunate about this is that a paradigm is created where straight men can play with the minds of desperate gay men, seeking the “real man”, of their fantasies, by giving them glimmers of hope of making them his “ultimate bitch.” I see the lust on many sites, especially onlyfans, where straight guys are playing fools out of their pockets for the sheer idea of a fantasy. To each his own, but why waste money on hope? I would never: Subscribe to any of their OnlyFans or hire for the services of any straight man, ever… I don’t want to play myself, nor do I want to give any straight man the satisfaction of believing that every gay man wants him. NO WAY….

The lust for straight guys isn’t a fetish, it’s a form of cognitive dissonance.

I guess everything is YMMV. I hire him every time he comes to town. He’s usually fresh out the shower and is always squeaky clean (although he doesn’t use deodorant, which I don’t mind), He does have good skills and the massages usually exceed time because he’s quite thorough (from head to every single toe. We always end up having good conversations about everything from sports (especially tennis), and even sports betting. I find him to be a cool guy overall. And always have a great time. This is truly an example of YMMV and preferences of the customer too. Personally, I like the scruffy “Boho” types.

I’ve hired him before. he’s great. Tall, Ruggedly Handsome, nice personality, and give a good sensorial experience. I’d recommend.

Sometimes the post-blowjob sore throat could be from an STI. Most of the time, it’s just from sucking a dirty dick.

Do you call this “advice”? However, I feel it's highly unlikely I'd have a bad bout of MP even if I were to get infected. Having a milder reaction to the 2nd shot would be unusual, since the immune system is primed, but it's good to know it's not inevitable. I have a few friends (younger) who've had 2 shots, and they appear to have the mark of Cain... 😬

Are you sure about that? I read your previous posts. You had a lot of negative things to say about the scar that comes from the vaccine. You literally placed more emphasis on the scar from the vaccine and trivialized the impacts of the actual virus….

Ummm…. Did you not say this?: “…….It’s not worthwhile getting the MPX booster at this point.” You’re making a suggestion while having a long term stating of confirming that you were (or are) at some point, a licensed medical professional. You have a social responsibility (which your pledged an oath to) to be very careful with giving medical advice (even it if is on a casual discussion forum, and even if it’s a “gentle” suggestion……

Here you go: https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/science-and-technology/2022/10/in-central-africa-a-deadly-monkeypox-variant-is-surging/amp

LOL. I referenced Hitler. I didn’t compare Hitler to anyone. Nice try though…..

For you to be so “intellectually astute”, there may be some need for improvement in the area of general comprehension. 1.) I didn’t compare you to Adolf Hitler. I noted how your dogmatic, singular stance on science can be used and manipulated in various forms. Hitler was a proven example of that. 2.) I find your hipocrisy to be sophomoric at best. Calling my responses “silly”, and stating that I’m reacting “emotionally” are insults. So, take a view in the mirror before clenching your pearls because someone challenged your little carefully curated diatribe of “facts.” 3.) And no sir, you did more than make a personal recommendation. You made an understanding warranted, unsolicited recommendation, touting yourself as an “expert” because of statistical data your plastered in the comments. That’s reckless and dangerous to do. There are many people out here naive enough to fall for pompous posts from self-proclaimed intellectuals telling them what they should not do, not realizing or acknowledging other factors that contribute to such matters as disease transmission. What if someone on the forum takes your advice, doesn’t get the vaccine, then travels to a place where there’s a variant that’s on the rise and contracts it? There are too many unknowns for your to “matter of factly tell people not to get the vaccine, when the vaccine is one of the reasons why Monkeypox’s transmission rates are disappearing in the first place?

1.) Eugenics wasn’t considered “pseudoscience” during the time that it was implemented. There were people just like yourself, confirmed in their beliefs based on those “scientific facts” during that time. 2.) I don’t distrust science. I just don’t believe that science should be the ONLY factor to evaluate when making judgments, suggestions, or decisions. There’s deeper context to everything. 3.) You say that science is the best way to make rational decisions. My point to you is that human beings don’t make rational decisions, and the risks of any infection/health condition should consider that fact. It would have been “rational” for all gay men to go celibate in the 1980s, but they didn’t. It would be rational for heterosexual couples to use protection to avoid pregnancies, but many don’t. It would also have been rational for no “at risk” population to have sex during the peak of Monkeypox until they were vaccinated, but people still did. This is why making literal assertions based on statistics and facts doesn’t always work in real life, because the human factor will throw in anomalies every time. 4.) In terms of “preposterous personal attacks”, all I did was infer that you’re a little smug… lighten up.. you know you are…. and that’s okay…. 😎 I find you to actually be quite hilarious. Making your points using “facts” and “data” and assume that all should be “rational” and “logical” in all of their decisions, when we are on a site whose platform is centered on one of life’s most irrational and illogical entities: SEX.